Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 30-2-101 (2026)

Right of surviving spouse and minor children to specific property

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1967, ch. 146, § 1; 1969, ch. 135, §§ 1, 2; T.C.A., §§ 30-801, 30-802; Acts 1985, ch. 140, § 9; 1997, ch. 426, § 3; 1999, ch. 491, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases, 1986–2019 · leading case: In Re Est. of Jones, 183 S.W.3d 372 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
In Re Est. of Jones, 183 S.W.3d 372 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “, Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 30-2-101(d) & 30-2-102(g) (2001).”
Cantrell v. Est. of Cantrell, 19 S.W.3d 842 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 30-2-101 (exempt property); TenmCode Ann.”
Phipps v. Watts, 781 S.W.2d 863 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 3× “§ 31-4-101 are the exemptions referred to in the probate code, Tenn.Code Ann. § 30-2-101 (1988). That section provides that certain items of personal property of an estate shall become the absolute property of a “surviving spouse, or, if none, the unmarried minor children of an…”
In re: Est. of Harold Jenkins, 8 S.W.3d 277 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “We disagreed, finding that these exemptions include only the items of personal property listed in section 30-2-101. See id. We recognized, however, that there are some circumstances under which life insurance proceeds should not be included in the decedent’s net estate, stating…”
In Re Est. of Soard, 173 S.W.3d 22 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “] § 30-2-101, Sarah Soard is entitled to $37,848.”
Clayton v. Morris, 104 S.W.3d 855 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “Consequently, surviving spouse is entitled to no further compensation under T.C.A. § 30-2-101. Whether surviving spouse’s elective share must be offset by property passing outside the Estate.”
Uhrig v. Pulliam, 713 S.W.2d 649 (Tenn. 1986). · cites it 2× “These are rights to exempt property, T.C.A. § 30-2-101, to a year’s support, T.”
In Re: Est. of Mary A. Grass (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 16× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 30-2-101 (a)(1). However, property held by a husband and a wife is presumed to be held by the entirety, and the laws of descent and distribution do not apply to property held as tenants by the entirety.”
In Re Est. of Margaret Owens Bush Baker (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 6× “(See Tenn. Code Ann. § 30-2-101 and Tenn. Code Ann.”
In Re Est. of Billy Joe Kerby (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “”); see also Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 30-2-101 (d); -102(g); and 204(b) (referring to the time limits set by Section 31-4-102(a)(1)).”
In Re: Est. of Frank Soard (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 3× “We specifically hold that the language of subsection (c) was not intended to include, and does not include, the statutory entitlements set forth in Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 30-2-101 (2001), 30-2-102 (2001), and 30-2-209 (2001).”
Roger Clayton Morris v. Lola Jane Morris (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “Consequently, surviving spouse is entitled to no further compensation under T.C.A. § 30-2-101. Whether surviving spouse’s elective share must be offset by property passing outside the Estate.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 30-2-101(a) — 1 case
In Re: Est. of Mary A. Grass (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 30-2-101 (a)(1). However, property held by a husband and a wife is presumed to be held by the entirety, and the laws of descent and distribution do not apply to property held as tenants by the entirety.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 30-2-101(a)(1) — 2 cases
In Re: Est. of Mary A. Grass (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 30-2-101 (a)(1). However, property held by a husband and a wife is presumed to be held by the entirety, and the laws of descent and distribution do not apply to property held as tenants by the entirety.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 30-2-101(d) — 2 cases
In Re Est. of Jones, 183 S.W.3d 372 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “, Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 30-2-101(d) & 30-2-102(g) (2001).”
In Re: Est. of Mary A. Grass (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 30-2-101 (a)(1). However, property held by a husband and a wife is presumed to be held by the entirety, and the laws of descent and distribution do not apply to property held as tenants by the entirety.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.