Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 30-2-305 (2026)
Debts chargeable against all assets
✓ current as of May 2026
Every debtor's property, except such as may be specially exempt by law, is assets for the satisfaction of all the debtor's just debts.
Code 1858, § 2252 (deriv. 5 Geo. II, ch. 7, § 4); Shan., § 3985; Code 1932, § 8197; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 30-508.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1994–2003 · leading case: Williams v. Comm'r, 103 T.C. 451 (Tax Ct. 1994).
Williams v. Comm'r, 103 T.C. 451 (Tax Ct. 1994). “30-2-305 (1984) (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the debt payment statute), 8 which contains the following *81 language: 30-2-305.”
Est. of Williams v. Huddleston, 938 S.W.2d 415 (Tenn. 1997). “Those issues include the construction and interpretation of Tenn.Code Ann. § 30-2-305 (1984) (“[ejvery debtor’s property, except such as may be specifically exempt by law, is assets for the satisfaction of all his just debts”); Tenn.”
Ann Wing v. Est. of James Wing (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 30-2-305 . Therefore, the whole revivor issue is much ado about nothing.”
William J. Vincent v. Reid Troutman (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). “Plaintiff relies on Tenn. Code Ann. § 30-2-305 , which states: “Every debtor’s property, except such as may be specially exempt by law, is assets for the satisfaction of all the debtor’s just debts.”
Bowman v. Midstate Fin. Co. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). “1945); see also Tenn. Code Ann. § 30-2-305 . It is, therefore, understandable why early English statutes provided that all transfers of property made with the intent to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors were fraudulent and void.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.