Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 31-4-101 (2026)

Right to elective share

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1977, ch. 25, § 4; T.C.A., § 31-601; Acts 1985, ch. 140, §28; 1997 , ch. 426, § 17; 2001, ch. 400, §3; 2004, ch. 866, §2; 2007 , ch. 13, §§ 1- 3.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 35 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1984–2021 · leading case: In re: Est. of Harold Jenkins, 8 S.W.3d 277 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).
In re: Est. of Harold Jenkins, 8 S.W.3d 277 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 42× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 31-4-101 (Supp.1993). When construing this statute, we must attempt to ascertain and give effect to the intent of its drafters, looking primarily to the natural and ordinary meaning of the words used.”
In Re Est. of Jones, 183 S.W.3d 372 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 10× “The trial court treated the sisters’ claims as “secured debts” and ordered that these claims, being $17,500 in total, be deducted as a part of the net estate calculation under Tenn.Code Ann. § 31-4-101(b) (Supp.2004).”
In Re Est. of Soard, 173 S.W.3d 22 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 17× “The parties differ as to the correct interpretation of Tenn. Code Ann. § 31-4-101 (2001), the statute setting forth the criteria pursuant to which a surviving spouse’s elective share is computed.”
Williams v. Comm'r, 103 T.C. 451 (Tax Ct. 1994). · cites it 15× “1993), the elective share must be reduced by a pro rata share of D's secured debts in determining the maximum allowable marital deduction under sec.”
Phipps v. Watts, 781 S.W.2d 863 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 10× “The right of a dissenting spouse to take an elective share of the estate is found in Tenn.Code Ann. § 31-4-101 (1988): (a) A decedent’s surviving spouse has the right to elect to take an elective share.”
Clayton v. Morris, 104 S.W.3d 855 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 6× “Calculation of the net estate is pursuant to T.C.A. § 31-4-101(b), which provides: The value of the net estate includes all of the decedent’s real and personal property subject to disposition under the provisions of the decedent’s will or the laws of intestate succession,…”
Daugherty v. Daugherty, 784 S.W.2d 650 (Tenn. 1990). · cites it 2× “T.C.A. § 31-4-101. The trial court found that the husband, as the surviving spouse, was an heir-at-law of the deceased and entitled to an elective share of one-third of one-half of the undivided interest in the parcels of real estate held by the parties as tenants-in-common…”
Est. of Williams v. Huddleston, 938 S.W.2d 415 (Tenn. 1997). · cites it 12× “1996), the widow filed a petition exercising her right to elect against the decedent’s will and take an elective share as authorized by Tenn.Code Ann. § 31-4-101 (Supp.1996). The probate court calculated the elective share by first subtracting from the sum of the total estate…”
In Re the Est. of Davis, 184 S.W.3d 231 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “Davis is not a “surviving spouse” within the meaning of section 31-4-101, Tennessee Code Annotated.”
Williams v. Williams, 868 S.W.2d 616 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 4× “Since we have found that the ante-nuptial agreement was ineffective, we further find that Alice Williams was a surviving spouse under T.C.A. § 31-4-101. The respondent argues, however, that even if the petitioner is a surviving spouse within the meaning of this statute, the in…”
Cantrell v. Est. of Cantrell, 19 S.W.3d 842 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “§ 30-2-102 (year’s support); and Tenn.Code Ann. § 31-4-101, et seq. (elective share).”
Uhrig v. Pulliam, 713 S.W.2d 649 (Tenn. 1986). · cites it 4× “As previously stated, both courts below held that the provisions of the agreement were sufficient to waive any claim by plaintiff for an elective share as a surviving widow pursuant to T.C.A. § 31-4-101. The Court of Appeals pointed out that in T.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 31-4-101(a) — 5 cases
In re: Est. of Harold Jenkins, 8 S.W.3d 277 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 31-4-101 (Supp.1993). When construing this statute, we must attempt to ascertain and give effect to the intent of its drafters, looking primarily to the natural and ordinary meaning of the words used.”
In Re Est. of Soard, 173 S.W.3d 22 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “The parties differ as to the correct interpretation of Tenn. Code Ann. § 31-4-101 (2001), the statute setting forth the criteria pursuant to which a surviving spouse’s elective share is computed.”
Est. of Williams v. Huddleston, 938 S.W.2d 415 (Tenn. 1997). “1996), the widow filed a petition exercising her right to elect against the decedent’s will and take an elective share as authorized by Tenn.Code Ann. § 31-4-101 (Supp.1996). The probate court calculated the elective share by first subtracting from the sum of the total estate…”
In Re: Est. of Mary A. Grass (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008).
In Re: Est. of Frank Soard (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 31-4-101(a)(1) — 2 cases
Will A. Cantrell v. Allen Cantrell (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 31-4-101(a)(2) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 31-4-101(b) — 14 cases
In Re Est. of Jones, 183 S.W.3d 372 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “The trial court treated the sisters’ claims as “secured debts” and ordered that these claims, being $17,500 in total, be deducted as a part of the net estate calculation under Tenn.Code Ann. § 31-4-101(b) (Supp.2004).”
In re: Est. of Harold Jenkins, 8 S.W.3d 277 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 31-4-101 (Supp.1993). When construing this statute, we must attempt to ascertain and give effect to the intent of its drafters, looking primarily to the natural and ordinary meaning of the words used.”
Phipps v. Watts, 781 S.W.2d 863 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1989). “The right of a dissenting spouse to take an elective share of the estate is found in Tenn.Code Ann. § 31-4-101 (1988): (a) A decedent’s surviving spouse has the right to elect to take an elective share.”
In Re Est. of Soard, 173 S.W.3d 22 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “The parties differ as to the correct interpretation of Tenn. Code Ann. § 31-4-101 (2001), the statute setting forth the criteria pursuant to which a surviving spouse’s elective share is computed.”
Clayton v. Morris, 104 S.W.3d 855 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). “Calculation of the net estate is pursuant to T.C.A. § 31-4-101(b), which provides: The value of the net estate includes all of the decedent’s real and personal property subject to disposition under the provisions of the decedent’s will or the laws of intestate succession,…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 31-4-101(c) — 10 cases
Clayton v. Morris, 104 S.W.3d 855 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). “Calculation of the net estate is pursuant to T.C.A. § 31-4-101(b), which provides: The value of the net estate includes all of the decedent’s real and personal property subject to disposition under the provisions of the decedent’s will or the laws of intestate succession,…”
In Re Est. of Soard, 173 S.W.3d 22 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “The parties differ as to the correct interpretation of Tenn. Code Ann. § 31-4-101 (2001), the statute setting forth the criteria pursuant to which a surviving spouse’s elective share is computed.”
In Re: Est. of Edward Alan Ladd (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020).
In Re: Est. of Mary A. Grass (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.