Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-6-501 (2026)
"Substantial likelihood of serious harm" defined
✓ current as of May 2026
IF AND ONLY IF
- (1)
- (A) a person has threatened or attempted suicide or to inflict serious bodily harm on the person, OR
- (B) the person has threatened or attempted homicide or other violent behavior, OR
- (C) the person has placed others in reasonable fear of violent behavior and serious physical harm to them, OR
- (D) the person is unable to avoid severe impairment or injury from specific risks, AND
- (2) there is a substantial likelihood that the harm will occur unless the person is placed under involuntary treatment,
THEN
- (3) the person poses a "substantial likelihood of serious harm" for purposes of this title.
Acts 2000, ch. 947, § 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2003–2025 · leading case: United States v. Christopher Perkins, 67 F.4th 583 (4th Cir. 2023).
United States v. Christopher Perkins, 67 F.4th 583 (4th Cir. 2023). “Codified Laws §§ 27A-1-1, 27A-1-2 (West 2022); Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 33-6-501 , 33-6- 502 (West 2022); Tex.”
Barbara T. Collins v. HCA Health Servs. Of Tennessee, Inc., 517 S.W.3d 84 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “Under Tennessee Code Annotated Section 33-6-401, a prospective detainee may *93 be detained by statutorily authorized persons: IF AND ONLY IF (1) [the prospective detainee] has a mental illness or serious emotional disturbance, AND (2) [the prospective detainee] poses an…”
Henderson v. City of Memphis (W.D. Tenn. 2021). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-6-501 . Tennessee’s statutory scheme governing warrantless mental health detentions “appears to be at least as stringent as federal law.”
State of Tennessee v. Johntavius Griggs (2025). “” See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 33-6-501 ; 55-5-402 (Supp.”
State of Tennessee v. Kenneth Ryan Mallady (Tenn. Crim. App. 2012). “§ 33-6-501(1). In addition, there must also be a “substantial likelihood that the harm will occur unless the person is placed under involuntary treatment.”
State of Tennessee v. David Cloar (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-6-501 . While not pertinent to our review, discharge to mandatory outpatient treatment was discussed at length in the trial court.”
Jessica Abeyta v. HCA Health Servs. of TN, Inc. d/b/a Parthenon Pavillion (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). “” In addition, Tennessee Code Annotated Section 33-6-403 describes the circumstances under which a patient may be involuntarily committed to treatment: IF AND ONLY IF (1) a person has a mental illness or serious emotional disturbance, AND (2) the person poses an immediate…”
State of Tennessee v. Sandra Lynn Baumgartner (Tenn. Crim. App. 2003). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-6-501 . We review a trial court’s determination that mandatory outpatient treatment is necessary de novo upon the trial court’s record with a presumption of correctness unless the evidence preponderates otherwise.”
In Re William B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021). “Section 33-6-401 provides as follows: IF AND ONLY IF (1) a person has a mental illness or serious emotional disturbance, AND (2) the person poses an immediate substantial likelihood of serious harm under § 33-6-501 because of the mental illness or serious emotional disturbance,…”
Ceola Johnson, individually & on behalf of Willie Johnson, Jr. v. UHS of Lakeside, LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015). “4 Section 33-6-403 provides: IF AND ONLY IF (1) a person has a mental illness or serious emotional disturbance, AND (2) the person poses an immediate substantial likelihood of serious harm, under § 33-6-501, because of the mental illness or serious emotional disturbance, AND (3)…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-6-501(1) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Kenneth Ryan Mallady (Tenn. Crim. App. 2012). “§ 33-6-501(1). In addition, there must also be a “substantial likelihood that the harm will occur unless the person is placed under involuntary treatment.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-6-501(2) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Kenneth Ryan Mallady (Tenn. Crim. App. 2012). “§ 33-6-501(1). In addition, there must also be a “substantial likelihood that the harm will occur unless the person is placed under involuntary treatment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.