Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-7-301 (2026)

Evaluation of accused believed incompetent to stand trial - Judicial hospitalization proceedings - Recovery report

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 100,Secs.s1, s2 eff. 4/10/2013.

Acts 1974, ch. 464, § 1; 1975, ch. 248, § 26; 1977, ch. 386, § 1; 1982, ch. 862, § 12; T.C.A., § 33-708; Acts 1985, ch. 437, § 26; 1987, ch. 143, § 4; 1998, ch. 978, §§ 1, 2; 2000, ch. 947, § 1; 2002, ch. 730, § 51; 2005, ch. 260, § 1; 2009, ch. 419, § 1; 2009, ch. 531, §§ 44, 46, 47; 2010, ch. 734, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 65 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case: State v. Reid, 213 S.W.3d 792 (Tenn. 2006).
State v. Reid, 213 S.W.3d 792 (Tenn. 2006). · cites it 8× “Tennessee Code Annotated Section 33-7-301 sets forth the procedure a court must undertake in appointing a competency expert.”
State v. Ferrell, 277 S.W.3d 372 (Tenn. 2009). · cites it 4× “On March 31, 2004, the trial court ordered the Defendant hospitalized “under Tenn.Code Ann. § 33-7-301 because of alleged mental illness which renders [him] incompetent to stand trial .”
State v. Rhoden, 739 S.W.2d 6 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1987). · cites it 4× “2d 62 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1981). This is especially true when the accused has been examined by a competent psychiatrist or psychologist, and the examiner finds the accused was sane when he committed the act and competent to stand trial.”
State v. Harrison, 270 S.W.3d 21 (Tenn. 2008). · cites it 4× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 33-7-301(a)(1) (2007). In addition to this evaluation, both the State and the defendant may obtain their own experts to address these questions.”
Reid v. State, 197 S.W.3d 694 (Tenn. 2006). · cites it 4× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 33-7-301(a)(4) (Supp. 2005).”
State v. Kiser, 284 S.W.3d 227 (Tenn. 2009). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 33-7-301(a)(l) (2001) (emphases added); cf.”
Van Tran v. State, 6 S.W.3d 257 (Tenn. 1999). · cites it 4× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 33-7-301(c) (Supp.1999) (requires a report at six-month intervals where a defendant has been found incompetent to stand trial); cf.”
State v. Bailey, 213 S.W.3d 907 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2006). · cites it 8× “Tennessee Code Annotated section 33-7-301 sets out the procedures for competency determinations for criminal defendants.”
Paul Dennis Reid, Jr. v. State of Tennessee, 396 S.W.3d 478 (Tenn. 2013). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-7-301 (a)(2) (2007 & Supp.”
Berndt v. State, 733 S.W.2d 119 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1987). · cites it 4× “T.C.A. § 33-7-301(a). This duty exists even in the absence of a motion seeking such a hearing.”
State v. Taylor, 771 S.W.2d 387 (Tenn. 1989). · cites it 2× “See T.C.A. § 33-7-301. Finally, in November 1983, after defendant had been reindicted, the trial court again ordered defendant’s transfer to MTMHI for a mental competency evaluation.”
State v. Lane, 689 S.W.2d 202 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1985). · cites it 3× “T.C.A. § 33-7-301 authorizes a psychiatric examination “(w)hen a person charged with a criminal offense is believed to be incompetent to stand trial, or there is a question as to his mental capacity at the time of the commission of the crime.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-7-301(a) — 18 cases
State v. Rhoden, 739 S.W.2d 6 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1987). “2d 62 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1981). This is especially true when the accused has been examined by a competent psychiatrist or psychologist, and the examiner finds the accused was sane when he committed the act and competent to stand trial.”
Berndt v. State, 733 S.W.2d 119 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1987). “T.C.A. § 33-7-301(a). This duty exists even in the absence of a motion seeking such a hearing.”
State v. Blackstock, 19 S.W.3d 200 (Tenn. 2000).
Moten v. State, 935 S.W.2d 416 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-7-301(a)(1) — 8 cases
State v. Harrison, 270 S.W.3d 21 (Tenn. 2008). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 33-7-301(a)(1) (2007). In addition to this evaluation, both the State and the defendant may obtain their own experts to address these questions.”
State of Tennessee v. Josue Segura (Tenn. Crim. App. 2012).
State of Tennessee v. Ricky Dean Harvey (Tenn. Crim. App. 2012).
State of Tennessee v. Antonio T. Smith (Tenn. Crim. App. 2011).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-7-301(a)(4) — 1 case
Reid v. State, 197 S.W.3d 694 (Tenn. 2006). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 33-7-301(a)(4) (Supp. 2005).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-7-301(a)(l) — 2 cases
State v. Kiser, 284 S.W.3d 227 (Tenn. 2009). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 33-7-301(a)(l) (2001) (emphases added); cf.”
State v. Harrison, 270 S.W.3d 21 (Tenn. 2008). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 33-7-301(a)(1) (2007). In addition to this evaluation, both the State and the defendant may obtain their own experts to address these questions.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-7-301(b) — 4 cases
State v. Bailey, 213 S.W.3d 907 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2006). “Tennessee Code Annotated section 33-7-301 sets out the procedures for competency determinations for criminal defendants.”
State of Tennessee v. Jamie L. Bailey (Tenn. Crim. App. 2006).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-7-301(b)(1)(A) — 2 cases
Richard C. Taylor v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2013).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-7-301(b)(4) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Chad Kilgore (Tenn. Crim. App. 2004).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-7-301(b)(l) — 1 case
State v. Bailey, 213 S.W.3d 907 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2006). “Tennessee Code Annotated section 33-7-301 sets out the procedures for competency determinations for criminal defendants.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 33-7-301(c) — 5 cases
Van Tran v. State, 6 S.W.3d 257 (Tenn. 1999). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 33-7-301(c) (Supp.1999) (requires a report at six-month intervals where a defendant has been found incompetent to stand trial); cf.”
State v. Bailey, 213 S.W.3d 907 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2006). “Tennessee Code Annotated section 33-7-301 sets out the procedures for competency determinations for criminal defendants.”
State of Tennessee v. Jeffery D. Lemay (Tenn. Crim. App. 2011).
State of Tennessee v. Chad Kilgore (Tenn. Crim. App. 2004).
State of Tennessee v. Jamie L. Bailey (Tenn. Crim. App. 2006).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.