Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-108 (2026)

Entities authorized to place children for adoption - Advisory and agency capacity authorized - Injunction to stop illegal payments

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 996,s 5, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 361, s 6, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 361, s 4, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 361, s 3, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 875, s 36, eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 758, s 1, eff. 1/1/2019.

Acts 1951, ch. 202, § 36 (Williams, § 9572.50); impl. am. Acts 1975, ch. 219, § 1; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 36-135; Acts 1986, ch. 767, § 9; T.C.A., § 36-1-134; Acts 1995, ch. 532, § 1; 1996, ch. 1054, §§ 18, 127; 2000, ch. 981, § 54; 2009 , ch. 411, § 4; 2009 , ch. 519, §§ 1, 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1984–2026 · leading case: In Re Baby, 447 S.W.3d 807 (Tenn. 2014).
In Re Baby, 447 S.W.3d 807 (Tenn. 2014). · cites it 22× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-108 (b)(1)–(2). Section 36-1-109 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: (a) It is unlawful for any person, corporation, agency, or other entity other than the [Department of Children’s Services] or a licensed child-placing agency or licensed clinical…”
In Re Frr, III, 193 S.W.3d 528 (Tenn. 2006). · cites it 4× “In so doing, the Court of Appeals addressed the applicability of Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-1-108, the parental relocation statute, an issue that was not raised in the juvenile court.”
In re K.A.Y, 80 S.W.3d 19 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “In August 2000, the Stuarts filed a second amended Motion to Intervene in which the Stuarts challenged the constitutionality of several adoption statutes, including Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 36-1-108, 36-1-115, 36-1-116 and 36-1-117.”
In re C.K.G., 173 S.W.3d 714 (Tenn. 2005). “§§ 36-1-108 to -109 (2001). However, the genetic test of Belsito also has significantly broad implications.”
Johnson v. Hall, 678 S.W.2d 65 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “The statute clearly contemplates natural or biological parents, adoptive parents, and guardians.”
In Re Ckg, 173 S.W.3d 714 (Tenn. 2005). · cites it 2× “See Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 36-1-108 to -109 (2001).”
In Re Baby (Tenn. 2014). · cites it 15× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-108 (b)(1)–(2). Section 36-1-109 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: (a) It is unlawful for any person, corporation, agency, or other entity other than the [Department of Children’s Services] or a licensed child-placing agency or licensed clinical…”
Amanda Carol Croslin & Phyllis Croslin Baker v. Danny Keith Croslin, wife Betty Jean Croslin & Stanley Gardner Haskins (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 12× “The trial court found that there was no compliance with T.C.A. § 36-1-108 (a)(1991) because a guardian ad litem was not appointed for Amanda.”
Christopher Conrad Fichtel v. Jill Crowell Fichtel (Zirwas) (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 4× “The trial court essentially rejected this testimony, noting that its mandate under section 36-1-108 was not to determine whether it was in the children’s best interest to maintain a close relationship with Mother, but whether it is in their best interest to relocate.”
In Re: Becka L. A. K. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 4× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-108 (a). The letter stated that Mother wished to be closer to her extended family and that the move would allow her to take advantage of some job opportunities in that area.”
Cheryl Ellen Mouton v. Michael J. Mouton (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-108 (d)(1). Reasonable purpose In this case, then, we must determine whether the trial court erred in finding that Father met his burden of proof to establish that Mother‟s proposed relocation was not for a reasonable purpose.”
James Simmons v. Rachel Montgomery Daniels (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-108 (a). In compliance with the statute, on September 18, 2023, Mother mailed a letter to Father notifying him that she planned to move to the “Jackson/Henderson area,” which is more than 50 miles from Father’s residence in Lake County.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-108(a) — 3 cases
In Re Baby, 447 S.W.3d 807 (Tenn. 2014). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-108 (b)(1)–(2). Section 36-1-109 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: (a) It is unlawful for any person, corporation, agency, or other entity other than the [Department of Children’s Services] or a licensed child-placing agency or licensed clinical…”
In Re Baby (Tenn. 2014). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-108 (b)(1)–(2). Section 36-1-109 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: (a) It is unlawful for any person, corporation, agency, or other entity other than the [Department of Children’s Services] or a licensed child-placing agency or licensed clinical…”
Amanda Carol Croslin & Phyllis Croslin Baker v. Danny Keith Croslin, wife Betty Jean Croslin & Stanley Gardner Haskins (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). “The trial court found that there was no compliance with T.C.A. § 36-1-108 (a)(1991) because a guardian ad litem was not appointed for Amanda.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-108(a)(2) — 2 cases
In Re Baby, 447 S.W.3d 807 (Tenn. 2014). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-108 (b)(1)–(2). Section 36-1-109 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: (a) It is unlawful for any person, corporation, agency, or other entity other than the [Department of Children’s Services] or a licensed child-placing agency or licensed clinical…”
In Re Baby (Tenn. 2014). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-108 (b)(1)–(2). Section 36-1-109 provides, in pertinent part, as follows: (a) It is unlawful for any person, corporation, agency, or other entity other than the [Department of Children’s Services] or a licensed child-placing agency or licensed clinical…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-108(c) — 1 case
Christopher Conrad Fichtel v. Jill Crowell Fichtel (Zirwas) (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). “The trial court essentially rejected this testimony, noting that its mandate under section 36-1-108 was not to determine whether it was in the children’s best interest to maintain a close relationship with Mother, but whether it is in their best interest to relocate.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-108(e) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.