Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-130 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Repealed by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 101,s 28, eff. 7/1/2022.
Acts 1995, ch. 532, § 1; 1996, ch. 1054, §§ 87, 116-118.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1998–1999 · leading case: Doe v. Sundquist, 2 S.W.3d 919 (Tenn. 1999).
Doe v. Sundquist, 2 S.W.3d 919 (Tenn. 1999). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-130 (1996). It does not create new rights or allow access to any records that previously were not to be released.”
Doe v. Sundquist (Tenn. 1999). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-130 (1996). It does not create new rights or 5 Similarly, given this statutory history, we also disagree with the Court of Appeals’ conclusion that the plaintiffs could reasonably rely on an alleged assurance of confidentiality from either a state agency…”
Doe v. Sundquist (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). “§ 36-1-130(a)(6)(A)(I). A violator of the contact veto provision is subject to civil and criminal liability.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-130(a)(6)(A)(I) — 1 case
Doe v. Sundquist (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). “§ 36-1-130(a)(6)(A)(I). A violator of the contact veto provision is subject to civil and criminal liability.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.