Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-142 (2026)

Voluntary delivery of infant - Notifications - Revocation of voluntary delivery - Termination of parental rights

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 293, s 2, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1008, s 2, eff. 5/9/2022.

Amended by 2020 Tenn. Acts, ch. 684, s 1, eff. 6/15/2020.

Acts 2001, ch. 388, § 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2004–2014 · leading case: In Re Cts, 156 S.W.3d 18 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
In Re Cts, 156 S.W.3d 18 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “of the child; or (v) The child, as a newborn infant aged seventy-two (72) hours or less, was voluntarily left at a facility by such infant's *25 mother pursuant to § 68-11-255; and, for a period of thirty (30) days after the date of voluntary delivery, the mother failed to visit…”
State of Tennessee, Dep't of Child.'s Servs. v. Daniel R. Howard in the Matter of W.A.H. & A.N.H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “are of the child; or (v) The child, as a newborn infant aged seventy-two (72) hours or less, was voluntarily left at a facility by such infant's mother pursuant to § 68-11-255; and, for a period of thirty (30) days after the date of voluntary delivery, the mother failed to visit…”
In The Matter Of: C.M.C., C.L.C., & D.A.M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “re of the child; or (v) The child, as a newborn infant aged seventy-two (72) hours or less, was voluntarily left at a facility by such infant's mother pursuant to § 68-11- 255; and, for a period of thirty (30) days after the date of voluntary delivery, the mother failed to visit…”
In Re: S.B.D.W., a minor child born, January 14, 1999 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “f the child; or -3- (v) The child, as a newborn infant aged seventy-two (72) hours or less, was voluntarily left at a facility by such infant's mother pursuant to § 68-11- 255; and, for a period of thirty (30) days after the date of voluntary delivery, the mother failed to visit…”
In Re Kaliyah S. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). “eceding such parent’s or guardian’s incarceration, or the parent or guardian has engaged in conduct prior to incarceration that exhibits a wanton disregard for the welfare of the child; or (v) The child, as a newborn infant aged seventy-two (72) hours or less, was voluntarily…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-142(e) — 5 cases
In Re Cts, 156 S.W.3d 18 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “of the child; or (v) The child, as a newborn infant aged seventy-two (72) hours or less, was voluntarily left at a facility by such infant's *25 mother pursuant to § 68-11-255; and, for a period of thirty (30) days after the date of voluntary delivery, the mother failed to visit…”
State of Tennessee, Dep't of Child.'s Servs. v. Daniel R. Howard in the Matter of W.A.H. & A.N.H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “are of the child; or (v) The child, as a newborn infant aged seventy-two (72) hours or less, was voluntarily left at a facility by such infant's mother pursuant to § 68-11-255; and, for a period of thirty (30) days after the date of voluntary delivery, the mother failed to visit…”
In The Matter Of: C.M.C., C.L.C., & D.A.M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “re of the child; or (v) The child, as a newborn infant aged seventy-two (72) hours or less, was voluntarily left at a facility by such infant's mother pursuant to § 68-11- 255; and, for a period of thirty (30) days after the date of voluntary delivery, the mother failed to visit…”
In Re: S.B.D.W., a minor child born, January 14, 1999 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “f the child; or -3- (v) The child, as a newborn infant aged seventy-two (72) hours or less, was voluntarily left at a facility by such infant's mother pursuant to § 68-11- 255; and, for a period of thirty (30) days after the date of voluntary delivery, the mother failed to visit…”
In Re Kaliyah S. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). “eceding such parent’s or guardian’s incarceration, or the parent or guardian has engaged in conduct prior to incarceration that exhibits a wanton disregard for the welfare of the child; or (v) The child, as a newborn infant aged seventy-two (72) hours or less, was voluntarily…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.