Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-2-309 (2026)

Tests to determine parentage

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1997, ch. 477, § 1; 1998, ch. 1098, § 10.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2007–2021 · leading case: In re T.C.D., 261 S.W.3d 734 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007).
In re T.C.D., 261 S.W.3d 734 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “§§ 36-2-309 (2005) and 24-7-112 (2000), Father requested that the trial court enter an order requiring paternity testing.”
In Re Tcd, 261 S.W.3d 734 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 36-2-309 (2005) and 24-7-112 (2000), Father requested that the trial court enter an order requiring paternity testing.”
In Re Michael J. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-2-309 (a) (2017). In any contested paternity action, 3 the court is authorized to order the parties and the child “to submit to genetic tests to determine the child’s parentage.”
In Re Madilene G. R. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “” Similarly, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-2-309 (b) states, in part, that “[n]othing in this subsection (b) shall preclude the issuance of a judgment against the mother or actual biological father of the child or children in favor of the person subsequently found not to be the father of…”
Dillon Brooks v. Heather Avery Andrews (2021). “31, 2018) (citing Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-2-309 (a)). - 14 - UCCJEA, and therefore, Tennessee had jurisdiction to make an initial custody determination.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.