Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-108 (2026)
Forced marriage prohibited - Civil action
✓ current as of May 2026
- (a) Marriage, at any age, that is entered into without valid, freely-given consent from both parties is contrary to the public policy of this state and shall be void and unenforceable in this state.
- (b) A person who is forced, whether by violence, threats, or coercion, to marry another shall have a cause of action against any party who forced the person to marry. A claim under this section shall not be based on parental or familial guidance motivated by the person's best interest, which is expressed in a reasonable manner.
- (c) Damages for a claim under this section shall include:
- (1) Liquidated damages of two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000);
- (2) Reasonable attorneys' fees; and
- (3) Court costs.
- (d) Upon a finding of forced marriage, the court shall order the marriage in question void.
- (e) Notwithstanding § 28-3-104, an action under this section must be commenced within ten (10) years after the cause of action accrues by solemnization of marriage.
Acts 2018, ch. 1049, § 8.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2012–2018 · leading case: In Re Blake A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018).
In Re Blake A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). “7 does not contest this holding; rather, she contends that the court should have applied section 36-3-108(d). The determination of the best interest of a child is a factual question, and this Court will presume a trial court’s factual findings in this regard to be correct,…”
In Re: Haven T. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). “Mother argues that the trial court incorrectly applied, or simply failed to apply, Tenn. Code Ann. §36-3-108 ,2 which controls relocation of a child.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-3-108(d) — 1 case
In Re Blake A. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). “7 does not contest this holding; rather, she contends that the court should have applied section 36-3-108(d). The determination of the best interest of a child is a factual question, and this Court will presume a trial court’s factual findings in this regard to be correct,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.