Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106 (2026)

Complaint for divorce or legal separation - Temporary injunctions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2014 Tenn. Acts, ch. 617, s 1, eff. 7/1/2014.

Code 1858, § 2452 (deriv. Acts 1835-1836, ch. 26, §§ 3, 18); Shan., § 4205; mod. Code 1932, § 8430; Acts 1957, ch. 46, § 1; 1957, ch. 74, § 1; 1971, ch. 50, § 1; 1971, ch. 437, § 1; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 36-805; Acts 1987, ch. 36, § 1; 1994, ch. 975, §§1-3; 1997 , ch. 544, § 1; 1997 , ch. 551, § 31; 1998, ch. 1059, §§ 8 - 10; 2001, ch. 280, § 1; 2002, ch. 565, §1; 2007 , ch. 187, §§ 1- 3; 2009 , ch. 280, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 72 cases (16 in the last 5 years), 1996–2026 · leading case: Rose Coleman v. Bryan Olson, 551 S.W.3d 686 (Tenn. 2018).
Rose Coleman v. Bryan Olson, 551 S.W.3d 686 (Tenn. 2018). · cites it 25× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106 (d)(2) (2010).”
Kisha Dean Trezevant v. Stanley H. Trezevant, III, 568 S.W.3d 595 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 10× “939 Rasco and 891 Rasco (Counts 1, 2, and 3) The trial court’s first three findings of contempt against Husband relate to his purchase of real estate in violation of the mandatory injunctions imposed by Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-4-106(d)44 and what the court found to…”
Davis v. Davis, 223 S.W.3d 233 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 6× “The petition alleged that Wife had violated the automatic statutory injunction, issued pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated § 36-4-106, enjoining both parties from transferring, *236 assigning, dissipating, disposing of, or borrowing against marital property without the consent…”
Blackburn v. Blackburn, 270 S.W.3d 42 (Tenn. 2008). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-4-106 (2005). In this case, in her complaint, Wife alleged that she should be granted a divorce on the grounds of irreconcilable differences between the parties, id.”
Larsen-Ball v. Ball, 301 S.W.3d 228 (Tenn. 2010). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106 (d)(1) (Supp.2009).”
Rice v. Rice, 983 S.W.2d 680 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “Husband moved for a bill of particulars, relying on T.C.A. § 36-4-106(a) 2 and Rule 12.06, Tenn.”
Nave v. Nave, 173 S.W.3d 766 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “When § 36-4-107 is read in conjunction with § 36-4-106 (Supp.2004), it is clear that the “petition” referred to in the former statute relates only to a petition for divorce.”
Elizabeth Anne Sykes v. Chad Steven Sykes (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 28× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106 (d)(5). Had the form order attached to Wife’s complaint accurately included this statutory language, it would have been proper for the trial court to find Husband in contempt of it.”
Susan Isbell v. William G. Hatchett (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 34× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106 (2014). 3 Isbell Motion to Enforce the Agreement in Shelby County Chancery Court On or around September 12, 2012, Ms.”
Susan Isbell v. William G. Hatchett- Corrected Opinion (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 34× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106 (2014). 3 Isbell Motion to Enforce the Agreement in Shelby County Chancery Court On or around September 12, 2012, Ms.”
Pamela Diane Stark v. Joe Edward Stark (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 13× “At the hearing, Husband asserted that the mandatory injunction provided by Tennessee Code Annotated Section 36-4-106 should extend to social media websites.”
Louise Ann Mawn v. Gregg Thomas Tarquinio (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 12× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106 (d). The injunction further prohibits “both parties from hiding, destroying or spoiling, in whole or in part, any evidence electronically stored or on computer hard drives or other memory storage devices.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106(a) — 1 case
Rice v. Rice, 983 S.W.2d 680 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). “Husband moved for a bill of particulars, relying on T.C.A. § 36-4-106(a) 2 and Rule 12.06, Tenn.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106(b) — 3 cases
In Re Kailyn B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022).
In Re: Natalie R.C. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106(b)(1) — 2 cases
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106(b)(2) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106(c) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106(d) — 20 cases
Kisha Dean Trezevant v. Stanley H. Trezevant, III, 568 S.W.3d 595 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). “939 Rasco and 891 Rasco (Counts 1, 2, and 3) The trial court’s first three findings of contempt against Husband relate to his purchase of real estate in violation of the mandatory injunctions imposed by Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-4-106(d)44 and what the court found to…”
Rose Coleman v. Bryan Olson, 551 S.W.3d 686 (Tenn. 2018). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106 (d)(2) (2010).”
Louise Ann Mawn v. Gregg Thomas Tarquinio (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106 (d). The injunction further prohibits “both parties from hiding, destroying or spoiling, in whole or in part, any evidence electronically stored or on computer hard drives or other memory storage devices.”
Elizabeth Anne Sykes v. Chad Steven Sykes (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106 (d)(5). Had the form order attached to Wife’s complaint accurately included this statutory language, it would have been proper for the trial court to find Husband in contempt of it.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106(d)(1) — 3 cases
Pamela Diane Stark v. Joe Edward Stark (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022). “At the hearing, Husband asserted that the mandatory injunction provided by Tennessee Code Annotated Section 36-4-106 should extend to social media websites.”
Victoria C. Jensen v. Tyler C. Jensen (Tenn. Ct. App. 2024).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106(d)(1)(A) — 4 cases
Davis v. Davis, 223 S.W.3d 233 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “The petition alleged that Wife had violated the automatic statutory injunction, issued pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated § 36-4-106, enjoining both parties from transferring, *236 assigning, dissipating, disposing of, or borrowing against marital property without the consent…”
Fatma Adel Sekik v. Nehad Abdelnabi (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020).
Fatma Adel Sekik v. Nehad Abdelnabi (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106(d)(1)(A)(i) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106(d)(2) — 1 case
Rose Coleman v. Bryan Olson, 551 S.W.3d 686 (Tenn. 2018). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106 (d)(2) (2010).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106(d)(3) — 2 cases
Pamela Diane Stark v. Joe Edward Stark (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022). “At the hearing, Husband asserted that the mandatory injunction provided by Tennessee Code Annotated Section 36-4-106 should extend to social media websites.”
Shem Malmquist v. Danielle Malmquist (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106(d)(5) — 2 cases
Elizabeth Anne Sykes v. Chad Steven Sykes (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106 (d)(5). Had the form order attached to Wife’s complaint accurately included this statutory language, it would have been proper for the trial court to find Husband in contempt of it.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-4-106(d)(l)(A) — 1 case
Davis v. Davis, 223 S.W.3d 233 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “The petition alleged that Wife had violated the automatic statutory injunction, issued pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated § 36-4-106, enjoining both parties from transferring, *236 assigning, dissipating, disposing of, or borrowing against marital property without the consent…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.