Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (2024)

Child support order - Jurisdiction - Amount of support - Enforcement - Modification - Insurance - Scientific parentage tests

✓ Justia copy: laws through about 2024 (2025 and 2026 sessions missing)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 40, s 1, eff. 3/14/2023.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 227, Secs.s 2, s 3 eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 227, s 1, eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 64, s 21, eff. 3/29/2021.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 345, s 31, eff. 5/10/2019.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1049, s 1, eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1049, s 2, eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 742, s 1, eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 419, s 2, eff. 7/1/2017.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 145, s 1, eff. 4/17/2017.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 200, s 2, eff. 7/1/2015.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 200, s 1, eff. 7/1/2015.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 236, s 22, eff. 4/19/2013.

Code 1858, § 2468 (deriv. Acts 1835-1836, ch. 26, §§ 10, 19); Shan., § 4221; mod. Code 1932, § 8446; Acts 1949, ch. 53, § 1; mod. C. Supp. 1950, § 8446; Acts 1970, ch. 425, § 1; 1979, ch. 187, § 1; 1979, ch. 339, § 1; 1980, ch. 691, § 1; 1983, ch. 352, § 1; 1983, ch. 414, § 1; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 36-820; Acts 1984, ch. 818, §§ 1-3; 1985, ch. 477, §§ 5-7, 17; 1986, ch. 890, § 17; 1987, ch. 39, § 1; 1988, ch. 671, § 1; 1989, ch. 206, § 1; 1989, ch. 489, § 4; 1991, ch. 447, § 1; 1992, ch. 824, § 1; 1993, ch. 243, §§ 1, 2; 1993, ch. 286, § 1; 1994, ch. 926, § 1; 1994, ch. 987, §§ 1-5; 1994, ch. 988, §§ 8, 9; 1995, ch. 504, § 2; 1996, ch. 892, § 16; 1997 , ch. 551, §§ 7, 19, 22, 25, 41, 51 - 53, 66; 1998, ch. 1098, §§ 13 - 15, 72; 1999, ch. 303, § 1; 2000, ch. 922, §§ 5 - 9; 2001, ch. 447, §§ 3, 14, 20; 2002, ch. 651, §§ 1 - 3; 2003 , ch. 305, § 1; 2003 , ch. 361, § 2; 2003 , ch. 373, § 1; 2004, ch. 549, §§ 1, 2; 2004, ch. 714, § 1; 2004, ch. 906, § 1; 2005, ch. 287, § 1; 2007 , ch. 91, § 1; 2007 , ch. 187, §§ 4 - 6; 2007 , ch. 502, §§ 1, 3; 2008 , ch. 868, § 3; 2011 , ch. 119, § 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1,512 cases (69 in the last 5 years), 1984–2026 · leading case: Bogan v. Bogan, 60 S.W.3d 721 (Tenn. 2001).
Bogan v. Bogan, 60 S.W.3d 721 (Tenn. 2001). · cites it 28× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (a)(1) (Supp. 2000).”
Berryhill v. Rhodes, 21 S.W.3d 188 (Tenn. 2000). · cites it 56× “Berryhill contends that both the Court of Appeals and the juvenile court erred in finding that the parent of a child to whom child support is owed may enter into a private agreement [4] to accept child support less than that required to be paid under the Child Support Guidelines…”
Robertson v. Robertson, 76 S.W.3d 337 (Tenn. 2002). · cites it 26× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (d)(l)(G). Unfortunately, due to the overwhelming amount of accumulated marital debt, the parties will not be able to enjoy the standard of living established during the marriage.”
State ex rel. McAllister v. Goode, 968 S.W.2d 834 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 32× “Equitable defenses that would have the effect of retroactively modifying a child support obligation are no longer available in cases such as this one because of the Tennessee Supreme Court’s construction of Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (a)(5). Rutledge v.”
Isbell v. Isbell, 816 S.W.2d 735 (Tenn. 1991). · cites it 43× “That statutory provision is a part of T.C.A. § 36-5-101, which governs liability for "support of spouse and children" at the time of marital dissolution or separation.”
Bryan v. Leach, 85 S.W.3d 136 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 27× “The parties used the term “rehabilitative alimony;” however, that term must be interpreted by reference to its meaning in 1992 when the agreement was made. C. Rehabilitative Alimony Since the parties’ 1992 divorce, Tennessee alimony law, which is primarily governed by statute,…”
Perry v. Perry, 114 S.W.3d 465 (Tenn. 2003). · cites it 18× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (d)(2) (1996 & Supp.”
Anderton v. Anderton, 988 S.W.2d 675 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 20× “" Based on this rather ambivalent finding, and after reciting that it had considered all the factors in Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d) (Supp.1997), the trial court declined to alter Mr.”
Crabtree v. Crabtree, 16 S.W.3d 356 (Tenn. 2000). · cites it 17× “An award of rehabilitative alimony pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 must be predicated upon a finding that the recipient can be economically rehabilitated.”
Watters v. Watters, 22 S.W.3d 817 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 22× “"For the purposes of defining a significant variance between the guideline amount and the current support order pursuant to T.C.A. § 36-5-101, a significant variance shall be at least 15% if the current support is one hundred dollars ($100.”
Earls v. Earls, 42 S.W.3d 877 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 25× “Earls’ current physical condition, the duration of the marriage, the division of the marital assets and debts, and the other applicable factors contained in Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (d) (Supp.1999).”
Broadbent v. Broadbent, 211 S.W.3d 216 (Tenn. 2006). · cites it 10× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (d)(l)(G), (H) (2001).”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(5): 1 case
Marika Petra Vickers v. Nicholas Scinta, No. 01A01-9507-CH-00281 (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 9, 1995).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(5)(d)(2): 1 case
Wilma Jean Lampley v. Gordon Ray Lampley, No. 01A01-9708-CH-00423, 1998 WL 44938 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 6, 1998).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(A)(5): 1 case
Elizabeth Sowell Needham v. Chad Dearman, No. M2004-02031-COA-R3-JV (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 5, 2006).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(C): 1 case
Ann Marie Gillespie v. Andrew Mark Gillespie, No. E2006-00734-R3-CV, 2006 WL 3732195 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 19, 2006).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(E): 2 cases
Marilyn MacLeod Reed v. John William Reed, No. M2003-02428-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 30, 2004).
Charles Fredrick Glanzman v. Joyce Bryant Glanzman, No. W2003-03067-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 2, 2004).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(E)(2): 1 case
Crabtree v. Crabtree, No. 01A01-9710-CV-00576 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 10, 1998).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(I): 1 case
Diana Sue Long v. Michael George Long, No. 01A01-9701-CV-00003 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 9, 1997).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a): 12 cases
Nash v. Mulle, 846 S.W.2d 803 (Tenn. 1993).
Hoyle v. Wilson, 746 S.W.2d 665 (Tenn. 1988).
Jones v. Jones, 784 S.W.2d 349 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1989).
Kesser v. Kesser, 201 S.W.3d 636 (Tenn. 2006).
Dwight v. Dwight, 936 S.W.2d 945 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a)(1): 83 cases
State ex rel. McAllister v. Goode, 968 S.W.2d 834 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). “Equitable defenses that would have the effect of retroactively modifying a child support obligation are no longer available in cases such as this one because of the Tennessee Supreme Court’s construction of Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (a)(5). Rutledge v.”
Bogan v. Bogan, 60 S.W.3d 721 (Tenn. 2001). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (a)(1) (Supp. 2000).”
Watters v. Watters, 22 S.W.3d 817 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). “"For the purposes of defining a significant variance between the guideline amount and the current support order pursuant to T.C.A. § 36-5-101, a significant variance shall be at least 15% if the current support is one hundred dollars ($100.”
Archer v. Archer, 907 S.W.2d 412 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995).
Wade v. Wade, 115 S.W.3d 917 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a)(1)(1991): 2 cases
Helen Bond Scofield v. Stephen David Scofield, No. 02A01-9512-CH-00276 (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 1996).
Judy Margaret Jackson Virostek v. James R. Virostek, No. 02A01-9601-CH-00019, 1997 WL 224872 (Tenn. Ct. App. May 6, 1997).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a)(1)(1994): 1 case
Helen Bond Scofield v. Stephen David Scofield, No. 02A01-9512-CH-00276 (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 1996).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a)(1)(5): 1 case
State v. Florence Harrell, No. E2001-01710-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 17, 2002).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a)(1)(A): 4 cases
Rebecca Lee Bradshaw Owings v. William Albert Owings, No. W2005-01233-COA-R3-CV, 2006 WL 3410702 (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 27, 2006).
William Rosenberg Richards v. Joy Wood Richards, No. M2003-02449-COA-R3-CV, 2005 WL 396373 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 17, 2005).
Louis Hudson Roberts v. Mary Elizabeth Todd, No. M2003-02594-COA-R3-CV, 2004 WL 2964717 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2004).
Lawson v. Lawson, No. 03A01-9709-CH-00406 (Tenn. Ct. App. May 20, 1998).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a)(1)(L): 2 cases
Lawson v. Lawson, No. 03A01-9709-CH-00406 (Tenn. Ct. App. May 20, 1998).
Jennitia Jane Blanton Isbell v. Larry Euniel Isbell, No. 02A01-9708-CH-00188 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 2, 1999).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a)(2): 6 cases
Nash v. Mulle, 846 S.W.2d 803 (Tenn. 1993).
Kuykendall v. Wheeler, 890 S.W.2d 785 (Tenn. 1994).
Franklin v. Franklin, 746 S.W.2d 715 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1987).
Bradford Furniture Co. v. Storey (In re Storey), 172 B.R. 872 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1994).
Heather Anne Gulish Gladwell v. Tony Neil Gladwell, Jr., No. W2014-01095-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. July 20, 2015).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a)(2)(A): 11 cases
Huntley v. Huntley, 61 S.W.3d 329 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001).
Bryan v. Leach, 85 S.W.3d 136 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “The parties used the term “rehabilitative alimony;” however, that term must be interpreted by reference to its meaning in 1992 when the agreement was made. C. Rehabilitative Alimony Since the parties’ 1992 divorce, Tennessee alimony law, which is primarily governed by statute,…”
Kesser v. Kesser, 201 S.W.3d 636 (Tenn. 2006).
Earls v. Earls, 42 S.W.3d 877 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “Earls’ current physical condition, the duration of the marriage, the division of the marital assets and debts, and the other applicable factors contained in Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (d) (Supp.1999).”
Melinda Diane Anderson (Byrd) v. Donald Matthew Anderson, Sr., No. M2004-00078-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 23, 2005).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a)(2)(B): 11 cases
Bryan v. Leach, 85 S.W.3d 136 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “The parties used the term “rehabilitative alimony;” however, that term must be interpreted by reference to its meaning in 1992 when the agreement was made. C. Rehabilitative Alimony Since the parties’ 1992 divorce, Tennessee alimony law, which is primarily governed by statute,…”
Lori Lee Grissom (Brown) v. Jeffrey Donald Grissom, 15 S.W.3d 474 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).
Chong Y. Struck v. Gary L. Struck - Concurring, 958 S.W.2d 352 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).
Lori Lee Grissom (Brown) v, Jeffrey Donald Grissom, No. 03A01-9607-CV-00219 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 4, 2001).
Shonda Kay Finchum v. Danny Wayne Finchum, No. M2012-00975-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 13, 2013).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a)(3): 22 cases
Isbell v. Isbell, 816 S.W.2d 735 (Tenn. 1991). “That statutory provision is a part of T.C.A. § 36-5-101, which governs liability for "support of spouse and children" at the time of marital dissolution or separation.”
Towner v. Towner, 858 S.W.2d 888 (Tenn. 1993).
Wright v. Quillen, 83 S.W.3d 768 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002).
Bryan v. Leach, 85 S.W.3d 136 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “The parties used the term “rehabilitative alimony;” however, that term must be interpreted by reference to its meaning in 1992 when the agreement was made. C. Rehabilitative Alimony Since the parties’ 1992 divorce, Tennessee alimony law, which is primarily governed by statute,…”
Lori Lee Grissom (Brown) v. Jeffrey Donald Grissom, 15 S.W.3d 474 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a)(3)(2001): 1 case
Wright v. Quillen, 83 S.W.3d 768 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a)(3)(A): 7 cases
Brewer v. Brewer, 869 S.W.2d 928 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1993).
Jacqueline S. Whiteside v. Jerry Whiteside, No. 03A01-9707-CV-00272 (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 7, 1998).
Deborah Lynn Mathews v. Douglas Clay Mathews, No. M2018-01886-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 11, 2019).
Christopher Eugene Rickman v. Tracy Anna Rickman, No. W2008-01276-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. May 13, 2009).
Charles Larry Honeycutt v. Ann Marie Migliaccio, No. W2003-00233-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 16, 2003).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a)(4): 1 case
State ex rel. Tewanna Stewart v. Gary Lockett, No. M2001-00809-COA-R3-JV, 2002 Tenn. App. LEXIS 66 (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 30, 2002).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a)(4)(A): 1 case
State ex rel. Stacy Anderson v. Stephen Taylor, No. M2001-02193-COA-R3-CV, 2003 WL 21480087 (Tenn. Ct. App. June 27, 2003).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a)(4)(A)(ii): 2 cases
State/Mae Clark v. Charles Clark, No. W2001-01896-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 20, 2002).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a)(4)(E): 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Roderick Lamont Parson, No. W2004-02588-COA-R3-JV (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 30, 2005).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a)(5): 45 cases
State ex rel. McAllister v. Goode, 968 S.W.2d 834 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). “Equitable defenses that would have the effect of retroactively modifying a child support obligation are no longer available in cases such as this one because of the Tennessee Supreme Court’s construction of Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (a)(5). Rutledge v.”
Rutledge v. Barrett, 802 S.W.2d 604 (Tenn. 1991).
Brooks v. Brooks, 992 S.W.2d 403 (Tenn. 1999).
Kirkpatrick v. O'NEAL, 197 S.W.3d 674 (Tenn. 2006).
Hoyle v. Wilson, 746 S.W.2d 665 (Tenn. 1988).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a)(5)(1996): 1 case
State. v. Shaver, No. 01A01-9610-CV-00474, 1997 WL 401827 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 18, 1997).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a)(5)(2001): 1 case
Buettner v. Buettner, 183 S.W.3d 354 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a)(7): 1 case
Lester G. Murphy, Sr. v. State of Tennessee Child Support Servs., No. M2014-02182-COA-R3-JV (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 7, 2015).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a)(8): 2 cases
Lisa E. Burris v. James Morton Burris, 512 S.W.3d 239 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
State of Tennessee v. Elijah Williams, No. W2020-00036-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Dec. 7, 2020).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a)(I): 1 case
JoAnne Pollock v. Donnie F. Pollock, No. 01A01-9706-CH-00271 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 6, 1998).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(a)(l): 32 cases
Huntley v. Huntley, 61 S.W.3d 329 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001).
State ex rel. McAllister v. Goode, 968 S.W.2d 834 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). “Equitable defenses that would have the effect of retroactively modifying a child support obligation are no longer available in cases such as this one because of the Tennessee Supreme Court’s construction of Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (a)(5). Rutledge v.”
McCarty v. McCarty, 863 S.W.2d 716 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992).
Demers v. Demers, 149 S.W.3d 61 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
Willis v. Willis, 62 S.W.3d 735 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(b): 5 cases
Johnson v. Turner, 125 F.3d 324 (6th Cir. 1997).
Bryan v. Leach, 85 S.W.3d 136 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “The parties used the term “rehabilitative alimony;” however, that term must be interpreted by reference to its meaning in 1992 when the agreement was made. C. Rehabilitative Alimony Since the parties’ 1992 divorce, Tennessee alimony law, which is primarily governed by statute,…”
In re Justin A. H., No. M2013-00292-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. July 7, 2014).
Melody Knowles v. Jack Knowles, No. M2001-01282-COA-R3-CV, 2002 WL 598551 (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 19, 2002).
Johnson v. Turner, 855 F. Supp. 228 (W.D. Tenn. 1994).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(b)(1): 1 case
State of Tennessee ex rel. Willie Beard v. Stacey Hannah, No. W2005-02350-COA-R3-JV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 7, 2006).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(b)(2): 1 case
State of Tennessee ex rel. Willie Beard v. Stacey Hannah, No. W2005-02350-COA-R3-JV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 7, 2006).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(c): 2 cases
Alexis Luttrell Tutor v. Joseph Keith Tutor, No. W2019-00544-COA-R3-CV, 2020 WL 1158075 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 10, 2020).
James William Rose v. Patrick M. Malone, No. M2023-01239-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 14, 2026).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(c)(2)(A): 4 cases
Smith v. Smith, 255 S.W.3d 77 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007).
Jordan Ashton Danelz v. John Gayden, No. W2012-01667-COA-R3-JV (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 25, 2013).
State of Tennessee ex rel. Mary Lott v. Ernest Lott, III, No. W2007-02443-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 6, 2008).
Tracye Jenae Simpson (Brogden) v. Ralph Edward Simpson - Concurring & Dissenting, No. E2005-01725-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 26, 2006).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(c)(2)(A)(ii): 1 case
State of Tennessee ex rel. Mary Lott v. Ernest Lott, III, No. W2007-02443-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 6, 2008).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d): 154 cases
Bogan v. Bogan, 60 S.W.3d 721 (Tenn. 2001). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (a)(1) (Supp. 2000).”
Isbell v. Isbell, 816 S.W.2d 735 (Tenn. 1991). “That statutory provision is a part of T.C.A. § 36-5-101, which governs liability for "support of spouse and children" at the time of marital dissolution or separation.”
Storey v. Storey, 835 S.W.2d 593 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992).
Herrera v. Herrera, 944 S.W.2d 379 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996).
Cranford v. Cranford, 772 S.W.2d 48 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1989).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(1): 158 cases
Earls v. Earls, 42 S.W.3d 877 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “Earls’ current physical condition, the duration of the marriage, the division of the marital assets and debts, and the other applicable factors contained in Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (d) (Supp.1999).”
Kincaid v. Kincaid, 912 S.W.2d 140 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995).
Anderton v. Anderton, 988 S.W.2d 675 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). “" Based on this rather ambivalent finding, and after reciting that it had considered all the factors in Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d) (Supp.1997), the trial court declined to alter Mr.”
Kinard v. Kinard, 986 S.W.2d 220 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).
Perry v. Perry, 114 S.W.3d 465 (Tenn. 2003). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (d)(2) (1996 & Supp.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(1)(1996): 1 case
Diana Sue Long v. Michael George Long, 968 S.W.2d 292 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(1)(A): 33 cases
Robertson v. Robertson, 76 S.W.3d 337 (Tenn. 2002). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (d)(l)(G). Unfortunately, due to the overwhelming amount of accumulated marital debt, the parties will not be able to enjoy the standard of living established during the marriage.”
Word v. Word, 937 S.W.2d 931 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996).
Mitts v. Mitts, 39 S.W.3d 142 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).
Crabtree v. Crabtree, 16 S.W.3d 356 (Tenn. 2000). “An award of rehabilitative alimony pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 must be predicated upon a finding that the recipient can be economically rehabilitated.”
Rita Jones v. Clinton Jones, No. E2001-03112-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 27, 2002).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(1)(B): 9 cases
Robertson v. Robertson, 76 S.W.3d 337 (Tenn. 2002). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (d)(l)(G). Unfortunately, due to the overwhelming amount of accumulated marital debt, the parties will not be able to enjoy the standard of living established during the marriage.”
Long v. Long, 957 S.W.2d 825 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).
Tait v. Tait, 207 S.W.3d 270 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
Suzan Darvarmanesh v. Mahyar Gharacholou, No. M2004-00262-COA-R3-CV, 2005 WL 1684050 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 19, 2005).
Duke Bowers Clement v. Janet Leigh Traylor Clement, No. W2003-02388-COA-R3-CV, 2004 WL 3396472 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 30, 2004).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(1)(C): 7 cases
Ann Marie Gillespie v. Andrew Mark Gillespie, No. E2006-00734-R3-CV, 2006 WL 3732195 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 19, 2006).
Bruce R. Goodman v. Judy Lynn McMurray Goodman, No. M2004-02781-COA-R3-CV, 2006 WL 47359 (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 9, 2006).
Rita Jones v. Clinton Jones, No. E2001-03112-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 27, 2002).
Barbara Beem v. Robert Alan Beem, No. 02A01-9511-CV-00252, 1996 WL 636491 (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 5, 1996).
Michael Jerry Cox v. Pamela Kay Cox, No. W2005-00552-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 22, 2005).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(1)(D): 7 cases
Robertson v. Robertson, 76 S.W.3d 337 (Tenn. 2002). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (d)(l)(G). Unfortunately, due to the overwhelming amount of accumulated marital debt, the parties will not be able to enjoy the standard of living established during the marriage.”
Ann Marie Gillespie v. Andrew Mark Gillespie, No. E2006-00734-R3-CV, 2006 WL 3732195 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 19, 2006).
Deborah B. Hall Byrd v. Danny K. Byrd, No. W2004-00796-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2004).
Rita Jones v. Clinton Jones, No. E2001-03112-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 27, 2002).
Michael Edward Ort v. Lora Jeanette Ort, No. W2005-00833-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 5, 2006).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(1)(E): 17 cases
Robertson v. Robertson, 76 S.W.3d 337 (Tenn. 2002). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (d)(l)(G). Unfortunately, due to the overwhelming amount of accumulated marital debt, the parties will not be able to enjoy the standard of living established during the marriage.”
Michael William Kwasnik v. Susan Marie Gillman Kwasnik, No. E2004-00781-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. July 8, 2005).
Earl E. Rivers v. Kathleen J. Rivers, No. W2004-02149-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 8, 2005).
Carol Ann Vick Watson v. Frank Lee Watson, Jr., No. W2004-01014-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 16, 2005).
Harry W. Lofton v. Nelda Joan Lofton, No. W2007-01733-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 30, 2008).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(1)(E)(i): 1 case
Byrd v. Byrd, 184 S.W.3d 686 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(1)(G): 10 cases
Eldridge v. Eldridge, 137 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002).
Anderton v. Anderton, 988 S.W.2d 675 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). “" Based on this rather ambivalent finding, and after reciting that it had considered all the factors in Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d) (Supp.1997), the trial court declined to alter Mr.”
Smith v. Smith, 93 S.W.3d 871 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002).
David Anthony Norman v. Melissa Dawn Norman, No. M2004-00738-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 31, 2005).
David Anthony Norman v. Melissa Dawn Norman, No. M2001-02796-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. July 11, 2002).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(1)(H): 6 cases
Robertson v. Robertson, 76 S.W.3d 337 (Tenn. 2002). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (d)(l)(G). Unfortunately, due to the overwhelming amount of accumulated marital debt, the parties will not be able to enjoy the standard of living established during the marriage.”
Crabtree v. Crabtree, 16 S.W.3d 356 (Tenn. 2000). “An award of rehabilitative alimony pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 must be predicated upon a finding that the recipient can be economically rehabilitated.”
Cunningham v. Cunningham, No. W1999-02054-COA-R3-CV, 2000 WL 33191364 (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 20, 2000).
Sherry Hopkins v. James Hopkins, No. E2001-02849-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 26, 2002).
Barbara Gaskins v. Roger Gaskins, No. E2000-02915-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 27, 2001).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(1)(I): 4 cases
Gary Wayne Robertson v. Lori Vanhooser Robertson, No. E2000-01698-COA-RM-CV, 2000 WL 1211314 (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 25, 2000).
Gary Wayne Robertson v. Lori Vanhooser Robertson - Concurring, No. 03A01-9711-CV-00511, 1998 WL 783339 (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 9, 1998).
Sherry Hopkins v. James Hopkins, No. E2001-02849-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 26, 2002).
Barbara Gaskins v. Roger Gaskins, No. E2000-02915-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 27, 2001).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(1)(J): 3 cases
Rita Jones v. Clinton Jones, No. E2001-03112-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 27, 2002).
Helen Hall v. James Hall, No. W2002-00786-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 16, 2002).
Sherry Hopkins v. James Hopkins, No. E2001-02849-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 26, 2002).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(1)(K): 9 cases
Kinard v. Kinard, 986 S.W.2d 220 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).
Anderton v. Anderton, 988 S.W.2d 675 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). “" Based on this rather ambivalent finding, and after reciting that it had considered all the factors in Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d) (Supp.1997), the trial court declined to alter Mr.”
Earls v. Earls, 42 S.W.3d 877 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “Earls’ current physical condition, the duration of the marriage, the division of the marital assets and debts, and the other applicable factors contained in Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (d) (Supp.1999).”
Jeanne L. Schuett v. Egon Horst Schuett, Jr., No. W2005-02482-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 4, 2006).
Rita Jones v. Clinton Jones, No. E2001-03112-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 27, 2002).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(1)(L): 1 case
Helen Hall v. James Hall, No. W2002-00786-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 16, 2002).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(10): 1 case
Hawkins v. Hawkins, 883 S.W.2d 622 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(2): 11 cases
Perry v. Perry, 114 S.W.3d 465 (Tenn. 2003). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (d)(2) (1996 & Supp.”
Fulbright v. Fulbright, 64 S.W.3d 359 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001).
Evans v. Young, 280 S.W.3d 815 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008).
William Perry v. Ricki Perry, No. W2001-01350-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 23, 2002).
Thomas White v. Kathy White, No. M2000-02674-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. July 12, 2001).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(2002): 1 case
Powell v. Powell, 124 S.W.3d 100 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(7): 2 cases
Bull v. Bull, 729 S.W.2d 673 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1987).
State of Tennessee v. Roderick Lamont Parson, No. W2004-02588-COA-R3-JV (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 30, 2005).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(8): 2 cases
Jones v. Jones, 784 S.W.2d 349 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1989).
Seal v. Seal, 802 S.W.2d 617 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1990).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(9): 3 cases
Hawkins v. Hawkins, 883 S.W.2d 622 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994).
Cranford v. Cranford, 772 S.W.2d 48 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1989).
Beeler v. Beeler, 715 S.W.2d 625 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(I): 1 case
JoAnne Pollock v. Donnie F. Pollock, No. 01A01-9706-CH-00271 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 6, 1998).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(l): 13 cases
Robertson v. Robertson, 76 S.W.3d 337 (Tenn. 2002). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (d)(l)(G). Unfortunately, due to the overwhelming amount of accumulated marital debt, the parties will not be able to enjoy the standard of living established during the marriage.”
Lindsey v. Lindsey, 976 S.W.2d 175 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).
Perry v. Perry, 114 S.W.3d 465 (Tenn. 2003). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (d)(2) (1996 & Supp.”
Kincaid v. Kincaid, 912 S.W.2d 140 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995).
Umstot v. Umstot, 968 S.W.2d 819 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(l)(1996): 1 case
Goodman v. Goodman, 8 S.W.3d 289 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(l)(2000): 1 case
Sullivan v. Sullivan, 107 S.W.3d 507 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(l)(2001): 1 case
Bowie v. Bowie, 101 S.W.3d 420 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(l)(A): 3 cases
Robertson v. Robertson, 76 S.W.3d 337 (Tenn. 2002). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (d)(l)(G). Unfortunately, due to the overwhelming amount of accumulated marital debt, the parties will not be able to enjoy the standard of living established during the marriage.”
Broadbent v. Broadbent, 211 S.W.3d 216 (Tenn. 2006). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (d)(l)(G), (H) (2001).”
Crabtree v. Crabtree, 16 S.W.3d 356 (Tenn. 2000). “An award of rehabilitative alimony pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 must be predicated upon a finding that the recipient can be economically rehabilitated.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(l)(B): 1 case
Crabtree v. Crabtree, 16 S.W.3d 356 (Tenn. 2000). “An award of rehabilitative alimony pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 must be predicated upon a finding that the recipient can be economically rehabilitated.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(l)(C): 2 cases
Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994).
Tait v. Tait, 207 S.W.3d 270 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(l)(D): 1 case
Crabtree v. Crabtree, 16 S.W.3d 356 (Tenn. 2000). “An award of rehabilitative alimony pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 must be predicated upon a finding that the recipient can be economically rehabilitated.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(l)(E)(i): 1 case
Byrd v. Byrd, 184 S.W.3d 686 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(l)(F): 2 cases
Crabtree v. Crabtree, 16 S.W.3d 356 (Tenn. 2000). “An award of rehabilitative alimony pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 must be predicated upon a finding that the recipient can be economically rehabilitated.”
Smith v. Smith, 984 S.W.2d 606 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(l)(G): 1 case
Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(l)(H): 2 cases
Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994).
Givler v. Givler, 964 S.W.2d 902 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(l)(I): 1 case
Robertson v. Robertson, 76 S.W.3d 337 (Tenn. 2002). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (d)(l)(G). Unfortunately, due to the overwhelming amount of accumulated marital debt, the parties will not be able to enjoy the standard of living established during the marriage.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(l)(J): 1 case
Robertson v. Robertson, 76 S.W.3d 337 (Tenn. 2002). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (d)(l)(G). Unfortunately, due to the overwhelming amount of accumulated marital debt, the parties will not be able to enjoy the standard of living established during the marriage.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d)(l)(K): 5 cases
Broadbent v. Broadbent, 211 S.W.3d 216 (Tenn. 2006). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (d)(l)(G), (H) (2001).”
Kinard v. Kinard, 986 S.W.2d 220 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).
Brown v. Brown, 913 S.W.2d 163 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994).
Anderton v. Anderton, 988 S.W.2d 675 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). “" Based on this rather ambivalent finding, and after reciting that it had considered all the factors in Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-5-101(d) (Supp.1997), the trial court declined to alter Mr.”
Young v. Young, 971 S.W.2d 386 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(e): 44 cases
Hopkins v. Hopkins, 152 S.W.3d 447 (Tenn. 2004).
Richardson v. Spanos, 189 S.W.3d 720 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
State v. Wilson, 132 S.W.3d 340 (Tenn. 2004).
Archer v. Archer, 907 S.W.2d 412 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995).
State ex rel. Vaughn v. Kaatrude, 21 S.W.3d 244 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(e)(1): 51 cases
Herrera v. Herrera, 944 S.W.2d 379 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996).
Berryhill v. Rhodes, 21 S.W.3d 188 (Tenn. 2000). “Berryhill contends that both the Court of Appeals and the juvenile court erred in finding that the parent of a child to whom child support is owed may enter into a private agreement [4] to accept child support less than that required to be paid under the Child Support Guidelines…”
Spruce v. Spruce, 2 S.W.3d 192 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).
Jahn v. Jahn, 932 S.W.2d 939 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996).
Barnett v. Barnett, 27 S.W.3d 904 (Tenn. 2000).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(e)(1)(A): 34 cases
Richardson v. Spanos, 189 S.W.3d 720 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
Desiree M. Beyer v. Erik A. Beyer, 428 S.W.3d 59 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013).
Corder v. Corder, 231 S.W.3d 346 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
State v. Wilson, 132 S.W.3d 340 (Tenn. 2004).
Hill v. Hill, 152 S.W.3d 543 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(e)(1)(B): 14 cases
Smith v. Smith, 165 S.W.3d 279 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
Kesser v. Kesser, 201 S.W.3d 636 (Tenn. 2006).
Nora Elizabeth Kilby Moore v. Ronnie Dale Moore, 254 S.W.3d 357 (Tenn. 2007).
Desiree M. Beyer v. Erik A. Beyer, 428 S.W.3d 59 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013).
Brendi Kaplan v. John A. Bugalla, No. M2003-01012-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. May 10, 2002).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(e)(1)(B)(2001): 1 case
Tierany Redmond v. Cletidus Marquell Hunt, No. W2004-00127-COA-R3-JV (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 10, 2004).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(e)(1)(C): 1 case
Jorge Antonio Mata Campos v. Amanda Rosa Ruiz Zeledon, No. M2023-01119-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 24, 2024).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(e)(2): 12 cases
Taylor v. Fezell, 158 S.W.3d 352 (Tenn. 2005).
Herrera v. Herrera, 944 S.W.2d 379 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996).
Jahn v. Jahn, 932 S.W.2d 939 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996).
Wade v. Wade, 115 S.W.3d 917 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002).
Gray v. Gray, 78 S.W.3d 881 (Tenn. 2002).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(e)(4): 3 cases
Kesser v. Kesser, 201 S.W.3d 636 (Tenn. 2006).
Tronco v. Crosley, 827 S.W.2d 802 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991).
Tiffany Reed v. Christopher Kidd, No. M2003-00650-COA-R3-JV (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 1, 2004).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(e)(4)(A): 2 cases
Mary Warren Kesser v. Peter Hale Kesser, No. W2003-02392-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 27, 2005).
State of Tennessee v. Nicholas A . Franks, No. W2009-02368-COA-R3-JV, 2010 WL 1730024 (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 30, 2010).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(e)(5): 1 case
Campanali v. Campanali, 695 S.W.2d 193 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1985).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(e)(7): 1 case
Hoyle v. Wilson, 746 S.W.2d 665 (Tenn. 1988).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(e)(l): 13 cases
Jones v. Jones, 930 S.W.2d 541 (Tenn. 1996).
Dwight v. Dwight, 936 S.W.2d 945 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996).
Huntley v. Huntley, 61 S.W.3d 329 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001).
Berryhill v. Rhodes, 21 S.W.3d 188 (Tenn. 2000). “Berryhill contends that both the Court of Appeals and the juvenile court erred in finding that the parent of a child to whom child support is owed may enter into a private agreement [4] to accept child support less than that required to be paid under the Child Support Guidelines…”
Nash v. Mulle, 846 S.W.2d 803 (Tenn. 1993).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(e)(l)(A): 6 cases
Patrick Edward Reeder v. Jo Beth (Curtis) Reeder, 375 S.W.3d 268 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).
Wiser v. Wiser, 339 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010).
Desiree M. Beyer v. Erik A. Beyer, 428 S.W.3d 59 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013).
Corder v. Corder, 231 S.W.3d 346 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
Gray v. Gray, 78 S.W.3d 881 (Tenn. 2002).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(e)(l)(B): 3 cases
Desiree M. Beyer v. Erik A. Beyer, 428 S.W.3d 59 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013).
Guzman v. Alvares, 205 S.W.3d 375 (Tenn. 2006).
Wiser v. Wiser, 339 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(f): 2 cases
In re Est. of James Edgar Miller, No. E2012-00648-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 22, 2013).
Shelley (Douglas) Stevenson v. Michael Kingston Stevenson, No. 01A01-9506-CV-00230 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 18, 2001).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(f)(1): 44 cases
Tina Marie Hodge v. Chadwick Craig, 382 S.W.3d 325 (Tenn. 2012).
State ex rel. Whitley v. Lewis, 244 S.W.3d 824 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007).
Lichtenwalter v. Lichtenwalter, 229 S.W.3d 690 (Tenn. 2007).
Patrick Edward Reeder v. Jo Beth (Curtis) Reeder, 375 S.W.3d 268 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012).
Anthony v. Jackson v. Ginger Jackson - Concurring/Dissenting, No. M2010-00575-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 30, 2011).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(f)(1)(A): 1 case
Andrea (Messer) Schwager v. Timothy Scott Messer, No. W2018-01820-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 27, 2019).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(f)(2): 2 cases
State of Tennessee ex rel. Rachel Beth Haynes v. Allan Vincent Daugherty, No. M2018-01394-COA-R10-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 10, 2019).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(f)(3): 1 case
In re Est. of James Edgar Miller, No. E2012-00648-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 22, 2013).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(f)(l): 3 cases
Tina Marie Hodge v. Chadwick Craig, 382 S.W.3d 325 (Tenn. 2012).
Morton v. Morton, 182 S.W.3d 821 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
Lichtenwalter v. Lichtenwalter, 229 S.W.3d 690 (Tenn. 2007).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(g): 19 cases
Kaplan v. Bugalla, 188 S.W.3d 632 (Tenn. 2006).
Wine v. Wine, 245 S.W.3d 389 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007).
Nora Elizabeth Kilby Moore v. Ronnie Dale Moore, 254 S.W.3d 357 (Tenn. 2007).
Melissa L. Blackshear (Thompson) v. Stephen D. Blackshear, No. E2012-02499-COA-R3-CV, 2014 WL 1092209 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 19, 2014).
Kellye & Reid v. Mitchell Sherman Reid, No. M2017-00119-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 15, 2018).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(g)(1): 12 cases
Kaplan v. Bugalla, 188 S.W.3d 632 (Tenn. 2006).
Corder v. Corder, 231 S.W.3d 346 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
Cory Randolph Cox v. Rebecca Lynne Thumm Cox, No. M2024-00827-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. May 28, 2025).
Kellye & Reid v. Mitchell Sherman Reid, No. M2017-00119-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 15, 2018).
Todd Scot v. Erin Dawn Scot, No. M2018-00562-COA-R3-CV, 2019 WL 2323826 (Tenn. Ct. App. May 31, 2019).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(g)(3): 1 case
Rebekah Shay Trembley v. Guy Dale Dunn, II, No. E2013-00820-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 28, 2014).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(g)(l): 1 case
Corder v. Corder, 231 S.W.3d 346 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(h): 11 cases
Berryhill v. Rhodes, 21 S.W.3d 188 (Tenn. 2000). “Berryhill contends that both the Court of Appeals and the juvenile court erred in finding that the parent of a child to whom child support is owed may enter into a private agreement [4] to accept child support less than that required to be paid under the Child Support Guidelines…”
Dwight v. Dwight, 936 S.W.2d 945 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996).
State ex rel. McAllister v. Goode, 968 S.W.2d 834 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). “Equitable defenses that would have the effect of retroactively modifying a child support obligation are no longer available in cases such as this one because of the Tennessee Supreme Court’s construction of Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101 (a)(5). Rutledge v.”
Mary Warren Kesser v. Peter Hale Kesser, No. W2003-02392-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 27, 2005).
Linda C. Gorrell v. Tyree B. Harris, IV, No. M2003-00629-COA-R3-JV (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 15, 2004).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(i): 6 cases
Barnhill v. Barnhill, 826 S.W.2d 443 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991).
Nash v. Mulle, 846 S.W.2d 803 (Tenn. 1993).
Diana Sue Long v. Michael George Long, 968 S.W.2d 292 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).
Joseph Alan Peters v. Sharon Olene (Coats) Peters, No. W2007-02594-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 19, 2009).
Dawn Larsen Niceley v. James Jacob Niceley, IV, No. M2001-02182-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 21, 2002).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(j): 4 cases
State v. Donnie O'Keith Lewis, No. W2015-01882-COA-R3-JV (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 21, 2016).
Shannon Wayne Brown v. Lisa Denise Brown (Church), No. E2011-00421-COA-R3-CV, 2012 WL 1267872 (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 13, 2012).
Donna Michele Locastro Corbin v. Richard Todd Corbin, No. W2008-00437-COA-R3-CV, 2009 WL 454134 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2009).
State of Tennessee ex rel. v. Jerry Keith Flatt, No. W2007-01376-COA-R3-CV, 2008 WL 794521 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 27, 2008).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(k): 13 cases
Kuykendall v. Wheeler, 890 S.W.2d 785 (Tenn. 1994).
Bryan v. Leach, 85 S.W.3d 136 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “The parties used the term “rehabilitative alimony;” however, that term must be interpreted by reference to its meaning in 1992 when the agreement was made. C. Rehabilitative Alimony Since the parties’ 1992 divorce, Tennessee alimony law, which is primarily governed by statute,…”
Tallent v. Cates, 45 S.W.3d 556 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000).
Angela Louine Niemeyer v. Glenn Paul Niemeyer, No. E2022-01690-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 17, 2024).
Karla M. Reichert v. David K. Reichert, No. M2025-00408-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 19, 2026).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(k)(1): 3 cases
Daniel C. Woodard v. Joan N. Woodard, No. E2017-00200-COA-R3-CV, 2018 WL 3339754 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 9, 2018).
Shannon Robert Gregory v. Kelly Ann Gregory, No. M2015-01781-COA-R3-CV, 2016 WL 3662182 (Tenn. Ct. App. June 30, 2016).
Nedra R. Hastings v. Larry Maurice Hastings, Jr., No. W2022-00433-COA-R3-JV (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 9, 2023).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(k)(2): 6 cases
Karla M. Reichert v. David K. Reichert, No. M2025-00408-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 19, 2026).
Edith Nell Allen Shaw v. Jerry Emerson Shaw, No. W2010-02369-COA-R3-CV, 2011 WL 4379052 (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 21, 2011).
Rochelle Yvonne Lillard v. Robert Walter Lillard, No. M2019-02305-COA-R3-CV, 2021 WL 861769 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 8, 2021).
Angela Louine Niemeyer v. Glenn Paul Niemeyer, No. E2022-01690-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 17, 2024).
Beverly Lynn Durham (Hess) Cook v. James Preston Hess, III, No. M2012-01554-COA-R3-CV, 2013 WL 1788553 (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 24, 2013).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(k)(3): 1 case
Rochelle Yvonne Lillard v. Robert Walter Lillard, No. M2019-02305-COA-R3-CV, 2021 WL 861769 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 8, 2021).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(l)(2): 1 case
State of Tennessee ex rel. Janet Morrow v. Jerry N. Morrow, Jr., No. M2008-01968-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 23, 2009).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(l)(5): 1 case
Kirkpatrick v. O'NEAL, 197 S.W.3d 674 (Tenn. 2006).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(o): 1 case
Sandra Silverstein v. William Rice, No. W1999-01336-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 25, 2000).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(p): 4 cases
In re Conservatorship of Michael Thomas Jones & Timothy Alan Jones Beverly Anne Jones v. Kevin Thomas Jones, No. M2004-00173-COA-R3-CV, 2004 WL 2973752 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 22, 2004).
Edith Nell Allen Shaw v. Jerry Emerson Shaw, No. W2010-02369-COA-R3-CV, 2011 WL 4379052 (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 21, 2011).
Clayton O. Lovlace, Jr. v. Susan Verlain Irvine Lovlace, No. M2003-01274-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 28, 2004).
Karla M. Reichert v. David K. Reichert, No. M2025-00408-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 19, 2026).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(p)(1): 3 cases
Clayton O. Lovlace, Jr. v. Susan Verlain Irvine Lovlace, No. M2003-01274-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 28, 2004).
State of Tennessee ex rel. Barbara E. Catalano v. William R. Woodcock, No. E2015-01877-COA-R9-CV, 2016 WL 3677342 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 5, 2016).
Nedra R. Hastings v. Larry Maurice Hastings, Jr., No. W2022-00433-COA-R3-JV (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 9, 2023).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(p)(2): 6 cases
In re Conservatorship of Michael Thomas Jones & Timothy Alan Jones Beverly Anne Jones v. Kevin Thomas Jones, No. M2004-00173-COA-R3-CV, 2004 WL 2973752 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 22, 2004).
Clayton O. Lovlace, Jr. v. Susan Verlain Irvine Lovlace, No. M2003-01274-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 28, 2004).
State of Tennessee ex rel. Barbara E. Catalano v. William R. Woodcock, No. E2015-01877-COA-R9-CV, 2016 WL 3677342 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 5, 2016).
Karla M. Reichert v. David K. Reichert, No. M2025-00408-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 19, 2026).
Edith Nell Allen Shaw v. Jerry Emerson Shaw, No. W2010-02369-COA-R3-CV, 2011 WL 4379052 (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 21, 2011).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(p)(3): 1 case
Clayton O. Lovlace, Jr. v. Susan Verlain Irvine Lovlace, No. M2003-01274-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 28, 2004).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-5-101(q)(1): 1 case
State of Tennessee ex rel. Willie Beard v. Stacey Hannah, No. W2005-02350-COA-R3-JV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 7, 2006).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.