Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-153 (2026)

Court files and records - Inspection limited - Exceptions for certain violent offenders - Confidentiality - Expunction

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 973,s 6, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 973,s 7, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 973,s 5, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2020 Tenn. Acts, ch. 806, Secs.s 3, s 4, s 5 eff. 10/1/2020.

Amended by 2020 Tenn. Acts, ch. 806, s 2, eff. 10/1/2020.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 177, s 1, eff. 4/23/2019.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1018, s 1, eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 199, Secs.s 1, s 2, s 3, s 4, s 5, s 6 eff. 7/1/2017.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 197, Secs.s 1, s 2 eff. 7/1/2017.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 196, s 1, eff. 7/1/2017.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1017, Secs.s 1, s 2, s 3, s 4 eff. 4/28/2016.

Acts 1970, ch. 600, § 51; T.C.A., § 37-251; Acts 1994, ch. 998, § 1; 1999, ch. 366, § 1; 2003 , ch. 238, § 2; 2005, ch. 265, § 4; 2005, ch. 412, § 1; 2007 , ch. 552, § 1; 2011 , ch. 483, § 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2026 · leading case: Gdongalay P. Berry v. State of Tennessee, 366 S.W.3d 160 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2011).
Gdongalay P. Berry v. State of Tennessee, 366 S.W.3d 160 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2011). · cites it 6× “Adjudications Code section 37-1-153 provides that “petitions and orders of the court in a delinquency proceeding” are open to the public if the offender is 14 years or older and the act alleged “would constitute first degree murder, second degree murder, rape, aggravated rape,…”
State v. Harris, 30 S.W.3d 345 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). · cites it 10× “The trial court found that under Tennessee Code Annotated section 37-1-153, the tape recording was a confidential record and its inspection could only be authorized by the juvenile court.”
Adam Ellithorpe v. Janet Weismark, 479 S.W.3d 818 (Tenn. 2015). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-153 (d)(1) (2010) ("Except as otherwise perl mitted in this section, it is an offense for a person to intentionally disclose or disseminate to the public the files and records of the juvenile court, including the child’s name and address.”
In Re Kansas B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 29× “On December 23, 2024, DOH filed a motion in the circuit court requesting that the “Court’s Orders, Recording, and Evidence” in the DCS case be released pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-153 (a)(5). Generally, the records in juvenile proceedings are confidential, but this…”
Connie Reguli v. Sharon Guffee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 19× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-153 (a). When read on its own, subsection (a) admittedly appears to entitle Plaintiffs to inspect the requested recordings of court proceedings, but subsection (a) must be read in conjunction with subsection (c).”
In Re: Carolina M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 15× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-153 (d)(1), (2) (2014).”
State v. Alvin Harris (Tenn. Crim. App. 2010). · cites it 15× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-153 (b) (1996). Appellant argues that under this statute, the petition and order were not confidential because Embrey was sixteen years old at the time of the delinquent act and he pled guilty to a delinquent act that would have been a ggravate d robbe ry…”
In Re P.G. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 8× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-153 (a)(1– 3). Relevant to this case, section 37-1-153(a)(5) also provides that the records are open to inspection “with permission of the court” to “any other person or agency or institution having a legitimate interest in the proceeding or in the…”
State of Tennessee v. Joseph Anthony Saitta, Jr. (Tenn. Crim. App. 2014). · cites it 8× “” The appellant argued that Cantrell’s disclosure about his juvenile adjudication violated Tennessee Code Annotated section 37-1-153 and DCS policy and procedure; that Cantrell disclosed the information “with the intent to influence the [Our Kids] findings in favor of criminal…”
Joseph Anthony Saitta, Jr. v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “The petitioner argued the DCS worker obtained the information regarding the juvenile conviction in violation of Tennessee Code Annotated section 37-1-153. Id. The Court of Criminal Appeals noted the petitioner failed to call the DCS worker at the suppression hearing, so it could…”
Christopher A. Davis v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “at 177-78 (citing Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 37-1-153 and -154). The Court concluded that none of Cartwright’s juvenile court records would have 25 been open to the general public.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-153(a) — 4 cases
State v. Harris, 30 S.W.3d 345 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). “The trial court found that under Tennessee Code Annotated section 37-1-153, the tape recording was a confidential record and its inspection could only be authorized by the juvenile court.”
Connie Reguli v. Sharon Guffee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-153 (a). When read on its own, subsection (a) admittedly appears to entitle Plaintiffs to inspect the requested recordings of court proceedings, but subsection (a) must be read in conjunction with subsection (c).”
State v. Alvin Harris (Tenn. Crim. App. 2010). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-153 (b) (1996). Appellant argues that under this statute, the petition and order were not confidential because Embrey was sixteen years old at the time of the delinquent act and he pled guilty to a delinquent act that would have been a ggravate d robbe ry…”
In Re: Carolina M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-153 (d)(1), (2) (2014).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-153(a)(2) — 1 case
Connie Reguli v. Sharon Guffee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-153 (a). When read on its own, subsection (a) admittedly appears to entitle Plaintiffs to inspect the requested recordings of court proceedings, but subsection (a) must be read in conjunction with subsection (c).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-153(a)(5) — 4 cases
State v. Harris, 30 S.W.3d 345 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). “The trial court found that under Tennessee Code Annotated section 37-1-153, the tape recording was a confidential record and its inspection could only be authorized by the juvenile court.”
In Re Kansas B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026). “On December 23, 2024, DOH filed a motion in the circuit court requesting that the “Court’s Orders, Recording, and Evidence” in the DCS case be released pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-153 (a)(5). Generally, the records in juvenile proceedings are confidential, but this…”
In Re P.G. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-153 (a)(1– 3). Relevant to this case, section 37-1-153(a)(5) also provides that the records are open to inspection “with permission of the court” to “any other person or agency or institution having a legitimate interest in the proceeding or in the…”
State v. Alvin Harris (Tenn. Crim. App. 2010). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-153 (b) (1996). Appellant argues that under this statute, the petition and order were not confidential because Embrey was sixteen years old at the time of the delinquent act and he pled guilty to a delinquent act that would have been a ggravate d robbe ry…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-153(b) — 2 cases
Gdongalay P. Berry v. State of Tennessee, 366 S.W.3d 160 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2011). “Adjudications Code section 37-1-153 provides that “petitions and orders of the court in a delinquency proceeding” are open to the public if the offender is 14 years or older and the act alleged “would constitute first degree murder, second degree murder, rape, aggravated rape,…”
State v. Alvin Harris (Tenn. Crim. App. 2010). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-153 (b) (1996). Appellant argues that under this statute, the petition and order were not confidential because Embrey was sixteen years old at the time of the delinquent act and he pled guilty to a delinquent act that would have been a ggravate d robbe ry…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-153(d) — 1 case
In Re: Carolina M. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 37-1-153 (d)(1), (2) (2014).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.