Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-511 (2026)

Indecent exposure

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1049,s 1, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1023,s 2, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1023,s 1, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 251, s 1, eff. 7/1/2019.

Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1; 1990, ch. 980, § 33; 1994, ch. 542, §§ 1-3; 1998, ch. 755, § 1; 1999, ch. 189, § 1; 2006, ch. 617, § 2; 2007 , ch. 209, § 1; 2009 , ch. 414, §§ 1, 2; 2011 , ch. 91, § 2; 2012 , ch. 885, § 1; 2012, ch. 1076, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1995–2026 · leading case: State v. Dominy, 6 S.W.3d 472 (Tenn. 1999).
State v. Dominy, 6 S.W.3d 472 (Tenn. 1999). · cites it 2× “Therefore, the defendant in this case, indicted for aggravated rape, under the rule announced in Trusty would be conclusively presumed to be on constitutional notice that he was being tried for, and could be convicted of, any of the sexual offenses contained in Title 39, Part 5…”
Powers v. State, 942 S.W.2d 551 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996). “§§ 39-13-511 (1991) and 39-14-406 (1991).”
DLS, Inc. v. City of Chattanooga, 914 F. Supp. 193 (E.D. Tenn. 1995). · cites it 10× “This case is before the Court on the plaintiffs’ application for a preliminary injunction against the City of Chattanooga (“City”) and the other defendants seeking to enjoin enforcement of CHATTANOOGA ClTY CODE §§ 25-84, 25-85, 11—434(j), 11—435(c), and Tenn. Code Ann. §…”
DLS, Inc. v. City of Chattanooga, 894 F. Supp. 1140 (E.D. Tenn. 1995). · cites it 4× “While nude dancing is proscribed by another Chattanooga ordinance, § 25-85 of the Chattanooga City Code, and by the state indecent exposure statute, Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-13-511, these pieces of legislation have not been challenged by the plaintiffs in this case.”
Akines v. Shelby Cnty. Gov't, 512 F. Supp. 2d 1138 (W.D. Tenn. 2007). · cites it 2× “Further, that particular inmate was charged with the offense of indecent exposure in violation of Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-13-511. (Def.’s Facts ¶ 28). Boyd could not recall the name of another inmate who exposed himself to her but another SCCC employee filed a…”
Lefevers v. State, 20 S.W.3d 707 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). “Non-exclusive and exclusive: Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-13-511(a)(1)(A)(i) (1999) ("Engages in sexual intercourse, masturbation, sodomy, bestiality, oral copulation, flagellation, excretory functions or other ultimate sex acts”); Tenn.”
State of Tennessee v. Roger F. Johnson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2019). · cites it 17× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-511 (2014). The Defendant was indicted as follows, and the specific portion to which he objects has been underlined: The Grand Jurors of Grundy County, Tennessee, duly impaneled and sworn upon their oath, present that: ROGER F.”
State of Tennessee v. Gregory Scott Barnum (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). · cites it 15× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-511 (2014) (emphasis added).”
Russell v. Giles Cnty., 105 F. Supp. 2d 841 (M.D. Tenn. 2000). · cites it 21× “The defendants in that action have filed a motion to dismiss asserting that their conduct was lawful under Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-511 (6) and § 8-127 of the Elkton City Ordinance.”
State v. Eddinger, 112 S.W.3d 148 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2002). · cites it 8× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-13-511 (Supp.1999). The “narrative” provided in the citation by Officer Strickland states as follows: On 7-30-00 myself and another ranger were dispatched on a call regarding a suspicious person in an older model vehicle hanging [sic] in the park.”
State of Tennessee v. Bernard Nelson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “According to Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-13-511 (2014): (a)(1) A person commits the offense of indecent exposure who: 6 (A) In a public place, as defined in § 39-11-106, or on the private premises of another, or so near thereto as to be seen from the private premises:…”
State of Tennessee v. Bobby Jay Fuqua (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “See T.C.A. §§ 39-13-511(a)(1)(A)(i)(a); 39- 13-517(b)(3).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-511(6) — 1 case
Russell v. Giles Cnty., 105 F. Supp. 2d 841 (M.D. Tenn. 2000). “The defendants in that action have filed a motion to dismiss asserting that their conduct was lawful under Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-511 (6) and § 8-127 of the Elkton City Ordinance.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-511(a)(1)(A)(i) — 3 cases
Lefevers v. State, 20 S.W.3d 707 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). “Non-exclusive and exclusive: Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-13-511(a)(1)(A)(i) (1999) ("Engages in sexual intercourse, masturbation, sodomy, bestiality, oral copulation, flagellation, excretory functions or other ultimate sex acts”); Tenn.”
State of Tennessee v. Roger F. Johnson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2019). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-511 (2014). The Defendant was indicted as follows, and the specific portion to which he objects has been underlined: The Grand Jurors of Grundy County, Tennessee, duly impaneled and sworn upon their oath, present that: ROGER F.”
State of Tennessee v. Bobby Jay Fuqua (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017). “See T.C.A. §§ 39-13-511(a)(1)(A)(i)(a); 39- 13-517(b)(3).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-511(a)(1)(A)(ii) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Roger F. Johnson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2019). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-511 (2014). The Defendant was indicted as follows, and the specific portion to which he objects has been underlined: The Grand Jurors of Grundy County, Tennessee, duly impaneled and sworn upon their oath, present that: ROGER F.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-511(a)(1)(A)(iii) — 1 case
DLS, Inc. v. City of Chattanooga, 894 F. Supp. 1140 (E.D. Tenn. 1995). “While nude dancing is proscribed by another Chattanooga ordinance, § 25-85 of the Chattanooga City Code, and by the state indecent exposure statute, Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-13-511, these pieces of legislation have not been challenged by the plaintiffs in this case.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-511(a)(6) — 1 case
Russell v. Giles Cnty., 105 F. Supp. 2d 841 (M.D. Tenn. 2000). “The defendants in that action have filed a motion to dismiss asserting that their conduct was lawful under Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-511 (6) and § 8-127 of the Elkton City Ordinance.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-511(a)(l)(A)(ii) — 1 case
Russell v. Giles Cnty., 105 F. Supp. 2d 841 (M.D. Tenn. 2000). “The defendants in that action have filed a motion to dismiss asserting that their conduct was lawful under Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-511 (6) and § 8-127 of the Elkton City Ordinance.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-511(b) — 2 cases
State of Tennessee v. Roger F. Johnson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2019). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-511 (2014). The Defendant was indicted as follows, and the specific portion to which he objects has been underlined: The Grand Jurors of Grundy County, Tennessee, duly impaneled and sworn upon their oath, present that: ROGER F.”
State of Tennessee v. Aulton Cody Barnes (Tenn. Crim. App. 2010).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-511(b)(3) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Gregory Scott Barnum (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-511 (2014) (emphasis added).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-511(b)(i) — 1 case
State v. Bradley D. Davis (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-511(c)(1)(A) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Louis L. Steele (Tenn. Crim. App. 2026).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.