Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-704 (2026)

Sex offender treatment board - Creation - Membership - Term - Duties - Immunity from liability

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 409, s 16, eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 204, s 1, eff. 4/22/2021.

Acts 1995, ch. 353, § 5; 1996, ch. 968, §§ 2-4; 1996, ch. 1079, § 123; 1998, ch. 1049, § 13.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1999–2025 · leading case: State v. Pierce, 138 S.W.3d 820 (Tenn. 2004).
State v. Pierce, 138 S.W.3d 820 (Tenn. 2004). · cites it 8× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-704 (d)(l) (2003).”
State v. Mounger, 7 S.W.3d 70 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). · cites it 8× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-704 (a) (1997). Of the thirteen members of the board, ten are appointed by the Commissioner of the Department of Correction, another is appointed by the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, and still another is appointed by the board's presiding officer…”
State v. Reams, 265 S.W.3d 423 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “” T.C.A. § 39-13-704(d)(2) (2006). When a defendant who is accused of committing one or more specified sex offenses seeks probation or other form of alternative sentence, the trial court must obtain an evaluation of the defendant.”
Craig Robert Nunn v. Tennessee Dep't of Corr., 547 S.W.3d 163 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 4× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-704 (a). The sex offender treatment board had several duties, including the following: The board shall develop guidelines and standards for a system of programs for the treatment of sex offenders that can be utilized by offenders who are placed on…”
State of Tennessee v. Westley A. Albright, 564 S.W.3d 809 (Tenn. 2018). · cites it 4× “]” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-704 (d)(2).3 Sex offenders placed on probation are required “to submit to an evaluation for treatment [and] risk potential,” id.”
Wooden v. Lee (W.D. Tenn. 2025). · cites it 7× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-704 (d); see also State v.”
State of Tennessee v. Gregory Pierce (Tenn. Crim. App. 2003). · cites it 6× “Moreover, the legislature has created, per section 39-13-704, a Sex Offender Treatment Board within the Department of Correction.”
State of Tennessee v. Mustapha Boutchiche (Tenn. Crim. App. 2009). · cites it 3× “st submit to an evaluation: On and after January 1, 1996, each sex offender who is to be considered for probation or any other alternative sentencing shall be required to submit to an evaluation for treatment, risk potential, procedures required for monitoring of behavior to…”
In the Matter OF Derrick B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “§ 39-13-704(d)(2) which discusses the use of polygraph examinations when monitoring and treating “sex offenders who have been ‘placed on probation, incarcerated with the department of correction, placed on parole, or placed in community corrections.”
In re A.J.H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “After acknowledging the legislative sanction for the use of polygraph examinations in the treatment and monitoring of sex offenders as provided by Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-13-704(d)(2), the Pierce court stated, “the propriety of using polygraph tests in treatment and…”
State of Tennessee v. William A. Marshall (Tenn. Crim. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-704 (d)(2) (Supp.”
State of Tennessee v. Russell Wheeler, Jr. (Tenn. Crim. App. 2021). “evant part, as follows: (a) On and after January 1, 1996, each sex offender who is to be considered for probation or any other alternative sentencing shall be required to submit to an evaluation for treatment, risk potential, procedures required for monitoring of behavior to…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-704(a) — 2 cases
State v. Mounger, 7 S.W.3d 70 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-704 (a) (1997). Of the thirteen members of the board, ten are appointed by the Commissioner of the Department of Correction, another is appointed by the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, and still another is appointed by the board's presiding officer…”
State v. Pierce, 138 S.W.3d 820 (Tenn. 2004). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-704 (d)(l) (2003).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-704(d) — 1 case
Wooden v. Lee (W.D. Tenn. 2025). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-704 (d); see also State v.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-704(d)(1) — 8 cases
State v. Mounger, 7 S.W.3d 70 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-704 (a) (1997). Of the thirteen members of the board, ten are appointed by the Commissioner of the Department of Correction, another is appointed by the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, and still another is appointed by the board's presiding officer…”
State of Tennessee v. Mustapha Boutchiche (Tenn. Crim. App. 2009). “st submit to an evaluation: On and after January 1, 1996, each sex offender who is to be considered for probation or any other alternative sentencing shall be required to submit to an evaluation for treatment, risk potential, procedures required for monitoring of behavior to…”
State of Tennessee v. Gregory Pierce (Tenn. Crim. App. 2003). “Moreover, the legislature has created, per section 39-13-704, a Sex Offender Treatment Board within the Department of Correction.”
State of Tennessee v. Russell Wheeler, Jr. (Tenn. Crim. App. 2021). “evant part, as follows: (a) On and after January 1, 1996, each sex offender who is to be considered for probation or any other alternative sentencing shall be required to submit to an evaluation for treatment, risk potential, procedures required for monitoring of behavior to…”
State v. Martin Charles Jones (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-704(d)(2) — 5 cases
State v. Pierce, 138 S.W.3d 820 (Tenn. 2004). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-704 (d)(l) (2003).”
State v. Reams, 265 S.W.3d 423 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007). “” T.C.A. § 39-13-704(d)(2) (2006). When a defendant who is accused of committing one or more specified sex offenses seeks probation or other form of alternative sentence, the trial court must obtain an evaluation of the defendant.”
State v. Mounger, 7 S.W.3d 70 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-704 (a) (1997). Of the thirteen members of the board, ten are appointed by the Commissioner of the Department of Correction, another is appointed by the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, and still another is appointed by the board's presiding officer…”
In the Matter OF Derrick B. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). “§ 39-13-704(d)(2) which discusses the use of polygraph examinations when monitoring and treating “sex offenders who have been ‘placed on probation, incarcerated with the department of correction, placed on parole, or placed in community corrections.”
In re A.J.H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “After acknowledging the legislative sanction for the use of polygraph examinations in the treatment and monitoring of sex offenders as provided by Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-13-704(d)(2), the Pierce court stated, “the propriety of using polygraph tests in treatment and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.