Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210 (2026)

Societies for prevention of cruelty to animals - Power of governmental agencies working with victimized animals

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 704,s 3, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 206, s 1, eff. 4/27/2017.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 157, s 1, eff. 7/1/2013.

Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1; 1997 , ch. 90, § 1; 2004, ch. 920, § 2; 2007 , ch. 128, §§ 1, 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1998–2017 · leading case: State v. Webb, 130 S.W.3d 799 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2003).
State v. Webb, 130 S.W.3d 799 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-14-210, in pertinent part, establishes that certain fines, penalties, and forfeitures from animal cruelty prosecutions inure to humane societies, that they have liens upon animals coming into their custody, and that victimized animals “shall…”
Lowery v. Faires, 57 F. Supp. 2d 483 (E.D. Tenn. 1998). · cites it 14× “In the absence of any evidence regarding the legislators' intent, the Court, for purposes of this opinion only, will adopt Lowery's argument and assume the actions of Faires, Bird, and the others were not authorized by Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210 . 15 As will become clear, the…”
State of Tennessee v. Carolyn Tillilie (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 22× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210 (g)(2) (emphasis added).”
In Re Tennessee Walking Horse Forfeiture Litig. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 3× “The trial court granted Appellees’, the purported owners of two Tennessee Walking Horses, motion to dismiss for failure to comply with Tennessee Code Annotated Sections 39-14-210(f) and 39-11-707(c). We vacate and remand.”
State of Tennessee v. Kenneth Hayes (Tenn. Crim. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “See T.C.A. § 39-14-210; see also, State v. William T.”
State of Tennessee v. Patricia Adkisson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210 (a) (emphasis added).”
In Re Tennessee Walking Horse Forfeiture Litig. (2017). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210 (g).10 Based upon this statute, the State asserts that it was required only to make “reasonable efforts” to notify Appellees of the seizure of their horses.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210(f) — 2 cases
State of Tennessee v. Carolyn Tillilie (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210 (g)(2) (emphasis added).”
In Re Tennessee Walking Horse Forfeiture Litig. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015). “The trial court granted Appellees’, the purported owners of two Tennessee Walking Horses, motion to dismiss for failure to comply with Tennessee Code Annotated Sections 39-14-210(f) and 39-11-707(c). We vacate and remand.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210(g) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Carolyn Tillilie (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210 (g)(2) (emphasis added).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210(g)(1)(A) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Carolyn Tillilie (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210 (g)(2) (emphasis added).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210(g)(1)(B) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Carolyn Tillilie (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210 (g)(2) (emphasis added).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210(g)(2) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Carolyn Tillilie (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210 (g)(2) (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.