Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-901 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This part shall be known and may be cited as the "Money Laundering Act of 1996."

Acts 1996, ch. 1012, § 9.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2003–2021 · leading case: Jackson v. Tennessee Dep't of Corr., 240 S.W.3d 241 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
Jackson v. Tennessee Dep't of Corr., 240 S.W.3d 241 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-901 et seq. (2003).”
State v. Jackson, 124 S.W.3d 139 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “Tennessee’s Money Laundering Act of 1996, Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-14-901 et seq., contains no explanation of the legislature’s purpose in passing the Act.”
State v. Price, 124 S.W.3d 135 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2003). “The certified question of law on appeal is whether Tennessee Code Annotated sections 39-14-901, -903, Money Laundering Act of 1996, violates Article XI, Section 8 or Article I, Section 8 of the Tennessee Constitution by exempting from its application violation of gambling laws,…”
United States v. Santos, 553 U.S. 507 (2008). · cites it 2× “§ 44-53-475 (2002); Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 39-14-901 to XX-XX-XXX (2006).”
Thomas Jackson v. Tennessee Dep't of Corr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 3× “Therefore, the following inmates are charged with violation of State law, T.C.A. 39-14-901: . . . Thomas Jackson #105316.”
State of Tennessee v. Robert Jason Allison (2021). “Compare Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-14-901 to -909, with 18 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.