Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-201 (2026)

Abortion trafficking of minors - Penalty - Exclusions and exceptions - Civil Actions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Added by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1032,s 1, eff. 7/1/2024.

Prior version repealed by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 313, s 4, eff. 4/28/2023.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1992–2025 · leading case: Davis v. Davis, 842 S.W.2d 588 (Tenn. 1992).
Davis v. Davis, 842 S.W.2d 588 (Tenn. 1992). · cites it 6× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-201 incorporates the trimester approach to abortion outlined in Roe v.”
Roddy v. Volunteer Med. Clinic, Inc., 926 S.W.2d 572 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 6× “aims for “severe pain and mental anguish” and “psychological injury and damage as a direct and proximate result of the Defendants’ negligence” failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted; the complaint failed to state a cause of action for outrageous conduct or…”
Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. Sundquist, 38 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2000). · cites it 62× “PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The abortion statutes at issue in this appeal are codified at Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 39-15-201 and -202 (1997).”
Memphis Ctr. for Reprod. Health v. Herbert Slatery, III, 14 F.4th 409 (6th Cir. 2021). “Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-15-201 (b)(1), -211(b), -212(a).”
Planned Parenthood Ass'n of Tennessee v. Don Sundquist, Governor of the State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 79× “Acts 1169 (codified at Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-15-201 , -208 (Supp.”
Hartsell Ex Rel. Upton v. Fort Sanders Reg'l Med. Ctr., 905 S.W.2d 944 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995). “Abortion is defined by T.C.A 39-15-201, as follows: (1) “Abortion” means the administration to any woman pregnant with child, whether such child be quick or not, of any medicine, drug, or substance whatever, or the use or employment of any instrument, or other means whatever,…”
Rachel Welty v. Bryant Dunaway (6th Cir. 2025). · cites it 2× “1032 (codified at Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-201 ). The Act bans adults from “intentionally recruit[ing], harbor[ing], or transport[ing] a pregnant unemancipated minor” within Tennessee “for the purpose of” concealing an abortion from the minor’s parents, procuring an abortion for…”
Memphis Ctr. for Reprod. Health v. Herbert Slatery, III (6th Cir. 2021). “Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-15-201 (b)(1), -211(b), -212(a).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-201(b) — 1 case
Planned Parenthood Ass'n of Tennessee v. Don Sundquist, Governor of the State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “Acts 1169 (codified at Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-15-201 , -208 (Supp.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-201(c)(1) — 1 case
Planned Parenthood Ass'n of Tennessee v. Don Sundquist, Governor of the State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “Acts 1169 (codified at Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-15-201 , -208 (Supp.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-201(c)(2) — 2 cases
Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. Sundquist, 38 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2000). “PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The abortion statutes at issue in this appeal are codified at Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 39-15-201 and -202 (1997).”
Planned Parenthood Ass'n of Tennessee v. Don Sundquist, Governor of the State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “Acts 1169 (codified at Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-15-201 , -208 (Supp.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-201(c)(3) — 1 case
Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. Sundquist, 38 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2000). “PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The abortion statutes at issue in this appeal are codified at Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 39-15-201 and -202 (1997).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-201(d) — 1 case
Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. Sundquist, 38 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2000). “PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The abortion statutes at issue in this appeal are codified at Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 39-15-201 and -202 (1997).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-15-201(e)(2) — 1 case
Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. Sundquist, 38 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2000). “PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The abortion statutes at issue in this appeal are codified at Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 39-15-201 and -202 (1997).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.