Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-16-508 (2026)

Coercion of juror

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1997–1997 · leading case: State v. Brewer, 945 S.W.2d 803 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997).
State v. Brewer, 945 S.W.2d 803 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “T.C.A. § 39-16-508(a)(1)-(2). The jury could reasonably infer from the defendant’s remarks in the kitchenette that he was asking her to vote against any indictments the district attorney general brought before the grand jury.”
Brumit v. Summar (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “Brumit is correct in stating that the behavior designated by that term still constitutes a criminal offense: Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-16-508 . Coercion of juror.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-16-508(a)(1) — 1 case
State v. Brewer, 945 S.W.2d 803 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997). “T.C.A. § 39-16-508(a)(1)-(2). The jury could reasonably infer from the defendant’s remarks in the kitchenette that he was asking her to vote against any indictments the district attorney general brought before the grand jury.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.