Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1314 (2026)

Preemption of local regulation of firearms, ammunition, and knives - Actions against firearms or ammunition manufacturer, trade association, or dealer - Party adversely affected by local regulation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 554, Secs.s4, s5, s6 eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 554, s 3, eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 444, s 4, eff. 5/13/2021.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 223, s 1, eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 467, s 1, eff. 7/1/2017.

Amended by 2014 Tenn. Acts, ch. 822, s 1, eff. 4/29/2014.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 418, s 1, eff. 7/1/2013.

Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1; 1999, ch. 293, §§ 1, 2; 2009 , ch. 428, § 3.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2000–2017 · leading case: Wisconsin Carry, Inc. v. City of Madison, 2017 WI 19 (Wis. 2017).
Wisconsin Carry, Inc. v. City of Madison, 2017 WI 19 (Wis. 2017). · cites it 2× “"); Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1314 (a) (2014) (no city "shall occupy any part of the field of regulation .”
Tennessee Firearms Ass'n v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 6× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1314 (a) (emphasis added).”
City of Philadelphia v. Beretta U.S.A., Corp., 126 F. Supp. 2d 882 (2000). “Codified Laws § 21-58-2 (Michie 2000); Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-1314 (1999); Tex.Civ.”
Wisconsin Carry, Inc. v. City of Madison (Wis. 2017). “"); Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1314 (a) (2014) (no city "shall occupy any part of the field of regulation .”
Wisconsin Carry, Inc. v. City of Madison (Wis. 2017). “"); Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1314 (a) (2014) (no city "shall occupy any part of the field of regulation .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1314(a) — 1 case
Tennessee Firearms Ass'n v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-1314 (a) (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.