Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-408 (2026)

Controlled substances in Schedule II

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1135, s 1, eff. 7/1/2022.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1040, Secs.s 5, s 6 eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1040, s 4, eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 302, s 2, eff. 7/1/2015.

Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1; 2000, ch. 884, § 1; 2007 , ch. 298, §§ 5-7; 2012 , ch. 812, § 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 160 cases (25 in the last 5 years), 1993–2026 · leading case: State of Tennessee v. Charlotte Lynn Frazier & Andrea Parks, 558 S.W.3d 145 (Tenn. 2018).
State of Tennessee v. Charlotte Lynn Frazier & Andrea Parks, 558 S.W.3d 145 (Tenn. 2018). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-17-408 (d)(2) (2018), 39-17-417(a), (j)(10) (2018).”
State v. Davis, 940 S.W.2d 558 (Tenn. 1997). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-408 (1992). Vandalism is punished under the provisions for grading theft.”
State v. Marshall, 870 S.W.2d 532 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “I The indictment, in pertinent part, alleged that the defendant did possess, with intent to sell, a controlled substance, to-wit: Cocaine, as classified in Section 39-17-408 of the Tennessee Code Annotated, in violation of TCA 39-17-417 and against the peace and dignity of the…”
State v. Wilson, 31 S.W.3d 189 (Tenn. 2000). · cites it 2× “did unlawfully deliver a controlled substance, to-wit: Cocaine, as classified in Section 39-17-408, in violation of Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 39 — 17— 417(c)(1), all of which is against the peace and dignity of the State of Tennessee.”
State of Tennessee v. Charles D. Sprunger, 458 S.W.3d 482 (Tenn. 2015). · cites it 2× “Section 39-17-408 contains only a list of Schedule II controlled substances and is irrelevant to any relief sought in the Complaint.”
State v. Smith, 48 S.W.3d 159 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “5 grams of Cocaine, within 1,000 feet of the real property that comprises a public elementary school, as classified in Section 39-17-408 of the Tennessee Code Annotated, in violation of TCA 39-17-417.”
State v. Nixon, 977 S.W.2d 119 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “ale County, Tennessee, duly empaneled and sworn, upon their oath, present that on or about the 11th day of May 1995, in Lauderdale County, Tennessee, and before the finding of this indictment, did unlawfully, feloniously, and knowingly possess with the intent to deliver a…”
State v. Ostein, 293 S.W.3d 519 (Tenn. 2009). “§ 39-17-408(a), (b)(4) (2003). Knowing possession with the intent to deliver or sell 300 or more grams of cocaine is a Class A felony.”
Abdur'Rahman v. Bredesen, 181 S.W.3d 292 (Tenn. 2005). “§ 39-17-408(e) (2003). Sodium Pentothal has a high potential for abuse, which can lead to severe dependence.”
State of Tennessee v. Phillip Pack, 421 S.W.3d 629 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “To obtain a conviction under Code section 39-13-210(a)(2), the State must first prove that the defendant distributed a Schedule I or Schedule II controlled substance, in this case methamphetamine, see T.C.A. § 39-17-408(d)(2) (designating “Methamphetamine, its salts, isomers,…”
State v. Blair, 145 S.W.3d 633 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2004). · cites it 2× ““Manufacture” means the production, preparation, propagation, compounding, conversion or processing of a controlled substance, either directly or indirectly by extraction from substances of natural origin, or independently by means of chemical synthesis, and includes any…”
Cornelius v. State, Dep't of Child.'s Servs., 314 S.W.3d 902 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). “onduct; (C) The commission of any act towards the child prohibited by §§ 39-13-502-39-13-504, 39-13-522, 39-15-302, and 39-17-1005 or the knowing failure to protect the child from the commission of any such act towards the child; or (D) Knowingly allowing a child to be present…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-408(4) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-408(a) — 4 cases
State v. Ostein, 293 S.W.3d 519 (Tenn. 2009). “§ 39-17-408(a), (b)(4) (2003). Knowing possession with the intent to deliver or sell 300 or more grams of cocaine is a Class A felony.”
State of Tennessee v. Garrick Graham (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016).
State of Tennessee v. Jawaune Massey (Tenn. Crim. App. 2014).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-408(b) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Raymond B. Thomas (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-408(b)(1) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-408(b)(1)(J) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Robert Pruitt (Tenn. Crim. App. 2013).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-408(b)(1)(M) — 3 cases
State of Tennessee v. William C. Boles (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-408(b)(1)(N) — 1 case
State of Tennessee Tommy Lynn Rutherford (Tenn. Crim. App. 2020).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-408(b)(1)(O) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-408(b)(2) — 2 cases
State of Tennessee v. Stacy Lee Fleming (Tenn. Crim. App. 2011).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-408(b)(4) — 30 cases
State of Tennessee v. Ronald Turner (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017).
State of Tennessee v. Gregory Gilliam (Tenn. Crim. App. 2021).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-408(c) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-408(c)(1) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-408(c)(9) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Seth Powell (Tenn. Crim. App. 2024).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-408(d) — 1 case
In Re Douglas H. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-408(d)(2) — 19 cases
State of Tennessee v. Phillip Pack, 421 S.W.3d 629 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2013). “To obtain a conviction under Code section 39-13-210(a)(2), the State must first prove that the defendant distributed a Schedule I or Schedule II controlled substance, in this case methamphetamine, see T.C.A. § 39-17-408(d)(2) (designating “Methamphetamine, its salts, isomers,…”
State v. Blair, 145 S.W.3d 633 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2004). ““Manufacture” means the production, preparation, propagation, compounding, conversion or processing of a controlled substance, either directly or indirectly by extraction from substances of natural origin, or independently by means of chemical synthesis, and includes any…”
Cornelius v. State, Dep't of Child.'s Servs., 314 S.W.3d 902 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). “onduct; (C) The commission of any act towards the child prohibited by §§ 39-13-502-39-13-504, 39-13-522, 39-15-302, and 39-17-1005 or the knowing failure to protect the child from the commission of any such act towards the child; or (D) Knowingly allowing a child to be present…”
State Dep't of Child.'s Servs. v. M.P., 173 S.W.3d 794 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-408(e) — 1 case
Abdur'Rahman v. Bredesen, 181 S.W.3d 292 (Tenn. 2005). “§ 39-17-408(e) (2003). Sodium Pentothal has a high potential for abuse, which can lead to severe dependence.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-408(f) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Raymond Lee Gibson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-408(f)(1) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Raymond Lee Gibson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.