Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-412 (2026)

Controlled substances in Schedule IV

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1040,s 8, eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 302,s 4, eff. 7/1/2015.

Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1; 1997, ch. 107, § 2; 1997, ch. 236, § 1; 1997, ch. 445, § 1; 1998, ch. 868, § 1; 2000, ch. 755, § 1; 2007, ch. 298, §§ 11-13; 2012, ch. 812, § 4.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2015–2023 · leading case: State of Tennessee v. Douglas E. Linville (Tenn. Crim. App. 2021).
State of Tennessee v. Douglas E. Linville (Tenn. Crim. App. 2021). · cites it 4× “First, the jury convicted the Defendant in count three for his possession of Xanax, which is a Schedule IV controlled substance, see T.C.A. § 39-17-412(a), (b). However, the judgment form reflects that he was convicted of possessing a Schedule III controlled substance.”
State of Tennessee v. Obada D. Abujaber (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-418 (a). Alprazolam and diazepam are both Schedule IV controlled substances.”
Brandon Washington v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-17-412 , -415, -417.”
State of Tennessee v. Eugene Bernard Cuddy, III (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “T.C.A. § 39-17-412(c)(1). The possession of Alprazolam for resale is a Class D felony.”
State of Tennessee v. Anthony Eugene Barnett (Tenn. Crim. App. 2019). “§ 39-17-412(c)(2). The evidence adduced at trial established that, upon stopping the defendant for speeding, Trooper Miller observed a baggy containing marijuana and pills in the floorboard of the defendant’s truck.”
State of Tennessee v. Lori Anne Pierce (Tenn. Crim. App. 2023). “As relevant to this case, it is also unlawful for a person to “possess with intent to deliver” any “drug paraphernalia, knowing, or under circumstances where one reasonably should know, that it will be used to . . . process, prepare, test, .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-412(a) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Douglas E. Linville (Tenn. Crim. App. 2021). “First, the jury convicted the Defendant in count three for his possession of Xanax, which is a Schedule IV controlled substance, see T.C.A. § 39-17-412(a), (b). However, the judgment form reflects that he was convicted of possessing a Schedule III controlled substance.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-412(c)(1) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Eugene Bernard Cuddy, III (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015). “T.C.A. § 39-17-412(c)(1). The possession of Alprazolam for resale is a Class D felony.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-412(c)(2) — 3 cases
State of Tennessee v. Douglas E. Linville (Tenn. Crim. App. 2021). “First, the jury convicted the Defendant in count three for his possession of Xanax, which is a Schedule IV controlled substance, see T.C.A. § 39-17-412(a), (b). However, the judgment form reflects that he was convicted of possessing a Schedule III controlled substance.”
State of Tennessee v. Anthony Eugene Barnett (Tenn. Crim. App. 2019). “§ 39-17-412(c)(2). The evidence adduced at trial established that, upon stopping the defendant for speeding, Trooper Miller observed a baggy containing marijuana and pills in the floorboard of the defendant’s truck.”
State of Tennessee v. Lori Anne Pierce (Tenn. Crim. App. 2023). “As relevant to this case, it is also unlawful for a person to “possess with intent to deliver” any “drug paraphernalia, knowing, or under circumstances where one reasonably should know, that it will be used to . . . process, prepare, test, .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.