Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-901 (2026)

Part definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The following definitions apply in this part, unless the context requires otherwise:

Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1; 1990, ch. 1092, §§ 1-3.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1993–2024 · leading case: Davis-Kidd Booksellers, Inc. v. McWherter, 866 S.W.2d 520 (Tenn. 1993).
Davis-Kidd Booksellers, Inc. v. McWherter, 866 S.W.2d 520 (Tenn. 1993). · cites it 41× “" Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-901 (4) (1991). We note that this exact same definition was held void for vagueness in Allied Artists Pictures Corp.”
State v. Pendergrass, 13 S.W.3d 389 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). · cites it 10× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-901 (1997). Thereafter, the section supplies the following definition.”
In Re Adoption of A.M.H., 215 S.W.3d 793 (Tenn. 2007). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-901(5) (2003). Because the one-year limitation under subsection 36-1-113(q) does not begin to run until the entry of a final order, we conclude the language used in the statute does not indicate an intent to affect a parent’s ability to timely pursue a…”
Friends of George's, Inc. v. Steven Mulroy, 108 F.4th 431 (6th Cir. 2024). · cites it 6× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-901 (6) (2023). So the new law prevents children from viewing adult performances.”
H & R Block E. Tax Servs., Inc. v. State, Dep't of Com. & Ins., Div. of Ins., 267 S.W.3d 848 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “1993) (quoting Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-901(4) (1991)). The court specifically noted that this definition “ends with the circular phrase of ‘violence for violence’s sake.”
State v. Marshall, 859 S.W.2d 289 (Tenn. 1993). · cites it 2× “§§ 39-17-902(a) and § 39-17-901(10), respectively. PERIPHERAL ISSUES The only issue that is before the Court is whether the provisions of T.”
Lefevers v. State, 20 S.W.3d 707 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). “§ 39-13-511(a)(1)(A)(i) (1999) ("Engages in sexual intercourse, masturbation, sodomy, bestiality, oral copulation, flagellation, excretory functions or other ultimate sex acts”); Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-901(14)(A) (" ‘Ultimate sexual acts’ means sexual intercourse, anal or…”
Friends of Georges, Inc. v. Steven J. Mulroy, in his Off. & individual capacity (W.D. Tenn. 2023). · cites it 20× “found by the average person applying contemporary community standards to appeal predominantly to the prurient, shameful or morbid interests of minors; (B) Is patently offensive to prevailing standards in the adult community as a whole with respect to what is suitable for minors;…”
Blount Pride, Inc v. Desmond (E.D. Tenn. 2023). · cites it 5× “] Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-901 (6)(A)-(C). Plaintiff Blount Pride organizes and hosts an annual Pride festival “in celebration of the LGBTQ+ community.”
State of Tennessee v. Eric Foster (Tenn. Crim. App. 2019). · cites it 3× “Code section 39-17-901(6) defines the term “harmful to minors”: “Harmful to minors” means that quality of any description or representation, in whatever form, of nudity, sexual excitement, sexual conduct, excess violence or sadomasochistic abuse when the matter or performance:…”
State of Tennessee v. Cauley McCliton Cross (Tenn. Crim. App. 2011). · cites it 4× “] T.C.A. § 39-17-901(6) (2008). It is clear from the record that the content of the movie was testified to by several witnesses, viewed in its entirety by the jury, and entered as an exhibit in this case.”
State of Tennessee v. Christopher Hank Bohannon (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “]” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-901 (3); 7 Tenn. Prac.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-901(1) — 1 case
State v. Pendergrass, 13 S.W.3d 389 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-901 (1997). Thereafter, the section supplies the following definition.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-901(10) — 1 case
State v. Marshall, 859 S.W.2d 289 (Tenn. 1993). “§§ 39-17-902(a) and § 39-17-901(10), respectively. PERIPHERAL ISSUES The only issue that is before the Court is whether the provisions of T.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-901(14)(A) — 1 case
Lefevers v. State, 20 S.W.3d 707 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). “§ 39-13-511(a)(1)(A)(i) (1999) ("Engages in sexual intercourse, masturbation, sodomy, bestiality, oral copulation, flagellation, excretory functions or other ultimate sex acts”); Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-901(14)(A) (" ‘Ultimate sexual acts’ means sexual intercourse, anal or…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-901(4) — 2 cases
Davis-Kidd Booksellers, Inc. v. McWherter, 866 S.W.2d 520 (Tenn. 1993). “" Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-901 (4) (1991). We note that this exact same definition was held void for vagueness in Allied Artists Pictures Corp.”
H & R Block E. Tax Servs., Inc. v. State, Dep't of Com. & Ins., Div. of Ins., 267 S.W.3d 848 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). “1993) (quoting Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-901(4) (1991)). The court specifically noted that this definition “ends with the circular phrase of ‘violence for violence’s sake.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-901(5) — 1 case
In Re Adoption of A.M.H., 215 S.W.3d 793 (Tenn. 2007). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-17-901(5) (2003). Because the one-year limitation under subsection 36-1-113(q) does not begin to run until the entry of a final order, we conclude the language used in the statute does not indicate an intent to affect a parent’s ability to timely pursue a…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-901(6) — 3 cases
Davis-Kidd Booksellers, Inc. v. McWherter, 866 S.W.2d 520 (Tenn. 1993). “" Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-901 (4) (1991). We note that this exact same definition was held void for vagueness in Allied Artists Pictures Corp.”
State of Tennessee v. Eric Foster (Tenn. Crim. App. 2019). “Code section 39-17-901(6) defines the term “harmful to minors”: “Harmful to minors” means that quality of any description or representation, in whatever form, of nudity, sexual excitement, sexual conduct, excess violence or sadomasochistic abuse when the matter or performance:…”
State of Tennessee v. Cauley McCliton Cross (Tenn. Crim. App. 2011). “] T.C.A. § 39-17-901(6) (2008). It is clear from the record that the content of the movie was testified to by several witnesses, viewed in its entirety by the jury, and entered as an exhibit in this case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.