Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-311 (2026)
Orders in discretion of court
✓ current as of May 2026
The court may, in its discretion, make such other orders as may be appropriate.
Acts 2001, ch. 444, § 1; T.C.A. § 40-30-411.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1997–2011 · leading case: Powers v. State, 343 S.W.3d 36 (Tenn. 2011).
Powers v. State, 343 S.W.3d 36 (Tenn. 2011). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-311 . The pertinent provision for purposes of this appeal, however, is section 40-30-302, which defines “DNA analysis” as “the process through which deoxyribo-nucleic acid (DNA) in a human biological specimen is analyzed and compared with DNA from…”
Sedley Alley v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2006). “See T.C.A. § 40-30-311 (court may enter orders as may be appropriate).”
State of Tennessee v. Marshall Ward Howell (Tenn. Crim. App. 2006). “The affidavit accompanying the drug test report in this case appears to satisfy each of the requirements set forth in section 40-30-311(c)(1). The laboratory that performed the testing first analyzed the defendant's urine sample with a technique called immunoassay, a procedure…”
Martucci v. State (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997). “DENIAL OF SENTENCING HEARING The petitioner contends that his constitutional rights were violated by the trial court’s failure to hold a sentencing hearing. This court ruled against the petitioner on this issue during his direct appeal.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-311(c)(1) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Marshall Ward Howell (Tenn. Crim. App. 2006). “The affidavit accompanying the drug test report in this case appears to satisfy each of the requirements set forth in section 40-30-311(c)(1). The laboratory that performed the testing first analyzed the defendant's urine sample with a technique called immunoassay, a procedure…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.