Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114 (2026)

Enhancement factors

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If appropriate for the offense and if not already an essential element of the offense, the court shall consider, but is not bound by, the following advisory factors in determining whether to enhance a defendant's sentence:

(1) The defendant has a previous history of criminal convictions or criminal behavior, in addition to those necessary to establish the appropriate range;

(2) The defendant was a leader in the commission of an offense involving two (2) or more criminal actors;

(3) The offense involved more than one (1) victim;

(4) A victim of the offense was particularly vulnerable because of age or physical or mental disability;

(5) The defendant treated, or allowed a victim to be treated, with exceptional cruelty during the commission of the offense;

(6) The personal injuries inflicted upon, or the amount of damage to property sustained by or taken from, the victim was particularly great;

(7) The offense involved a victim and was committed to gratify the defendant's desire for pleasure or excitement;

(8) The defendant, before trial or sentencing, failed to comply with the conditions of a sentence involving release into the community;

(9) The defendant possessed or employed a firearm, explosive device or other deadly weapon during the commission of the offense;

(10) The defendant had no hesitation about committing a crime when the risk to human life was high;

(11) The felony resulted in death or serious bodily injury, or involved the threat of death or serious bodily injury, to another person, and the defendant has previously been convicted of a felony that resulted in death or serious bodily injury;

(12) During the commission of the felony, the defendant intentionally inflicted serious bodily injury upon another person, or the actions of the defendant resulted in the death of, or serious bodily injury to, a victim or a person other than the intended victim;

(13) At the time the felony was committed, one (1) of the following classifications was applicable to the defendant:
- (A) Released on bail or pretrial release, if the defendant is ultimately convicted of the prior misdemeanor or felony;
- (B) Released on parole;
- (C) Released on probation;
- (D) On work release;
- (E) On community corrections;
- (F) On some form of judicially ordered release;
- (G) On any other type of release into the community under the direct or indirect supervision of any state or local governmental authority or a private entity contracting with the state or a local government;
- (H) On escape status; or
- (I) Incarcerated in any penal institution on a misdemeanor or felony charge or a misdemeanor or felony conviction;

(14) The defendant abused a position of public or private trust, or used a professional license in a manner that significantly facilitated the commission or the fulfillment of the offense;

(15) The defendant committed the offense on the grounds or facilities of a pre-kindergarten through grade twelve (pre-K-12) public or private institution of learning when minors were present;

(16) The defendant was adjudicated to have committed a delinquent act or acts as a juvenile that would constitute a felony if committed by an adult;

(17) The defendant intentionally selected the person against whom the crime was committed or selected the property that was damaged or otherwise affected by the crime, in whole or in part, because of the defendant's belief or perception regarding the race, religion, color, disability, sexual orientation, national origin, ancestry or gender of that person or the owner or occupant of that property; however, this subdivision (17) should not be construed to permit the enhancement of a sexual offense on the basis of gender selection alone;

(18) The offense was an act of terrorism or was related to an act of terrorism;

(19) If the defendant is convicted of the offense of aggravated assault pursuant to § 39-13-102, the victim of the aggravated assault was a law enforcement officer, firefighter, correctional officer, youth services officer, probation and parole officer, a state registered security guard/officer, an employee of the department of correction or the department of children's services, a uniformed member of the armed forces or national guard, an emergency medical or rescue worker, emergency medical technician or paramedic, whether compensated or acting as a volunteer; provided, that the victim was performing an official duty and the defendant knew or should have known that the victim was such an officer or employee;

(20) If the defendant is convicted of the offenses of rape pursuant to § 39-13-503, sexual battery pursuant to § 39-13-505 or rape of a child pursuant to § 39-13-522, the defendant caused the victim to be mentally incapacitated or physically helpless by use of a controlled substance or controlled substance analogue;

(21) If the defendant is convicted of the offenses of aggravated rape pursuant to § 39-13-502, rape pursuant to § 39-13-503, rape of a child pursuant to § 39-13-522 or statutory rape pursuant to § 39-13-506, the defendant knew or should have known that, at the time of the offense, the defendant was HIV positive;

(22)
- (A) If the defendant is convicted of the offenses of aggravated arson pursuant to § 39-14-302 or vandalism pursuant to § 39-14-408, the damage or destruction was caused to a structure, whether temporary or permanent in nature, used as a place of worship and the defendant knew or should have known that it was a place of worship;
- (B) As used in subdivision (22)(A), "place of worship" means any structure that is:
  - (i) Approved, or qualified to be approved, by the state board of equalization for property tax exemption pursuant to § 67-5-212, based on ownership and use of the structure by a religious institution; and
  - (ii) Utilized on a regular basis by a religious institution as the site of congregational services, rites or activities communally undertaken for the purpose of worship;

(23) The defendant is an adult and sells to or gives or exchanges a controlled substance, controlled substance analogue or other illegal drug with a minor;

(24) The offense involved the theft of property and, as a result of the manner in which the offense was committed, the victim suffered significant damage to other property belonging to the victim or for which the victim was responsible;

(25)
- (A) The defendant commits an offense:
  - (i) During the time period between the first occurrence of events or conduct that later results in a declaration of a state of emergency by a county, the governor, or the president of the United States and the time the county, governor, or the president of the United States terminates the state of emergency, as provided in § 58-2-107;
  - (ii) Within the area or areas threatened by the emergency, as established by the county's, governor's, or president's declaration of a state of emergency; and
  - (iii) Knowing of the existence of the emergency;
- (B) As used in this subdivision (25):
  - (i) "Emergency" means an occurrence, or threat thereof, whether natural, technological, or manmade, in war or in peace, that results or may result in substantial injury or harm to the population, or substantial damage to or loss of property; provided, that natural threats may include disease outbreaks and epidemics; and
  - (ii) "Offense" means the defendant is convicted of a violation of § 39-14-103, § 39-14-104, § 39-14-408, or any other offense involving theft or vandalism that is graded by value pursuant to § 39-14-105, and the value of the property or service taken or property damaged is no greater than the value provided in § 39-14-105 for a Class E felony;

(26) The defendant committed the offense of robbery pursuant to § 39-13-401, aggravated robbery pursuant to § 39-13-402, or especially aggravated robbery pursuant to § 39-13-403, on the premises of a licensed pharmacy in an effort to unlawfully obtain, sell, give, or exchange a controlled substance, controlled substance analogue, or other illegal drug;

(27) The defendant commits a violent offense, as classified in § 40-35-120(b), against a uniformed law enforcement officer or uniformed member of the armed forces or national guard; and the defendant intentionally selected the person against whom the crime was committed, in whole or in part, because of the person's status as a law enforcement officer or member of the armed forces or national guard;

(28) At the time the instant offense was committed, the defendant was illegally or unlawfully in the United States;

(29) The offense involved the theft of a firearm from a motor vehicle, as defined in § 55-1-103;

(30)
- (A) The defendant committed the offense of aggravated assault, as defined in § 39-13-102(a), or attempted first degree murder, as defined in § 39-13-202, on the grounds or premises of a healthcare facility;
- (B) As used in this subdivision (30), "healthcare facility" means a hospital licensed under title 33 or 68; and

(31) The defendant committed an offense under title 39, chapter 13, part 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 while engaged in the performance of official duties as a law enforcement officer.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 318, s 1, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 306, s 1, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 108, s 11, eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by 2020 Tenn. Acts, ch. 580, s 18, eff. 7/1/2020.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 492, s 1, eff. 7/1/2017.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 265, s 2, eff. 7/1/2017.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 265, s 1, eff. 7/1/2017.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 934, s 1, eff. 7/1/2016.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1025, s 1, eff. 1/1/2017.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 443, s 1, eff. 7/1/2015.

Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 6; 1992, ch. 837, § 1; 1994, ch. 821, § 1; 1994, ch. 978, § 5; 1995, ch. 302, § 1; 1995, ch. 322, § 2; 1995, ch. 515, § 2; 1997 , ch. 437, § 3; 1997 , ch. 547, § 3; 2000, ch. 896, § 1; 2002, ch. 849, § 2c; 2005, ch. 353, § 5; 2007 , ch. 173, § 1; 2008 , ch. 690, § 2; 2012 , ch. 848, § 33.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3,310 cases (331 in the last 5 years), 1990–2026 · leading case: State v. Imfeld, 70 S.W.3d 698 (Tenn. 2002).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Imfeld, 70 S.W.3d 698 (Tenn. 2002). · cites it 57× “The trial court imposed a three-year sentence for each of the five offenses of aggravated assault 4 based on the application of seven enhancement factors: the defendant had a prior history of criminal convictions or criminal behavior, Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114 (1) (1997 & Supp.”

State v. Poole, 945 S.W.2d 93 (Tenn. 1997). · cites it 68× “" In imposing the 21-year sentence for especially aggravated robbery, the trial court applied four enhancement factors: the defendant's prior history of criminal convictions and behavior, Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114 (1); the victim was particularly vulnerable due to her age,…”

State v. Lewis, 44 S.W.3d 501 (Tenn. 2001). · cites it 54× “In addition, we find that the record supports the “multiple victim” enhancement factor found at Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114 (3). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals as modified and affirm the twenty-one-year sentence imposed by the trial court.”

State v. Arnett, 49 S.W.3d 250 (Tenn. 2001). · cites it 27× “§ 40-35-114(5); (2) expert proof is not required to determine whether psychological injuries inflicted on a victim are “particularly great,” Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114 (6); (3) evidence other than proof of orgasm is required to establish that the defendant raped the victim to…”

State v. Banks, 271 S.W.3d 90 (Tenn. 2008). · cites it 21× “[him] that under the new sentencing law that the court is required to start at the .”

State v. Reid, 91 S.W.3d 247 (Tenn. 2002). · cites it 18× “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-114; State v. Nix, 922 S.”

State v. Freeman, 943 S.W.2d 25 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996). · cites it 50× “T.C.A. § 40-35-114 provides for the application of appropriate enhancement factors “if not themselves essential elements of the offense as charged in the indictment.”

State v. Adams, 864 S.W.2d 31 (Tenn. 1993). · cites it 32× “The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the convictions but reduced the total sentence from eighteen years to eleven years (the statutory minimum) on the basis that there were no applicable enhancement factors as set forth in T.C.A. § 40-35-114. We granted the State’s Rule 11…”

State v. Griffis, 964 S.W.2d 577 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997). · cites it 30× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-114(4). 107 . Tenn.”

State v. Cross, 362 S.W.3d 512 (Tenn. 2012). · cites it 28× “Cross’s convictions for felony evading arrest (count two) and felony reckless endangerment (count three) involved the risk of harm to persons other than Deputy Smith and, therefore, that the trial court could appropriately consider the risk of harm to Deputy Smith in arriving at…”

State v. Jones, 883 S.W.2d 597 (Tenn. 1994). · cites it 21× “§ 40-35-114(6), (10), (16) (1990), were “essential elements of the offense charged” and thus proscribed by T.C.A. § 40-35-114 from use as enhancement factors.”

State v. Alvarado, 961 S.W.2d 136 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996). · cites it 28× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114 (stating that the factors listed may be used to enhance a sentence as long as the factors are not themselves essential elements of the offense as charged in the indictment).”

Show all 3,310 citing cases →

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(1) — 781 cases

State v. Reid, 91 S.W.3d 247 (Tenn. 2002). “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-114; State v. Nix, 922 S.”

State v. Gomez, 239 S.W.3d 733 (Tenn. 2007).

State v. Souder, 105 S.W.3d 602 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2002).

State v. Ross, 49 S.W.3d 833 (Tenn. 2001).

State v. Imfeld, 70 S.W.3d 698 (Tenn. 2002). “The trial court imposed a three-year sentence for each of the five offenses of aggravated assault 4 based on the application of seven enhancement factors: the defendant had a prior history of criminal convictions or criminal behavior, Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114 (1) (1997 & Supp.”

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(1)(2010) — 1 case

State of Tennessee v. Mousen Yisak Aden (Tenn. Crim. App. 2013).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(10) — 158 cases

State v. Lewis, 44 S.W.3d 501 (Tenn. 2001). “In addition, we find that the record supports the “multiple victim” enhancement factor found at Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114 (3). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals as modified and affirm the twenty-one-year sentence imposed by the trial court.”

State v. Cross, 362 S.W.3d 512 (Tenn. 2012). “Cross’s convictions for felony evading arrest (count two) and felony reckless endangerment (count three) involved the risk of harm to persons other than Deputy Smith and, therefore, that the trial court could appropriately consider the risk of harm to Deputy Smith in arriving at…”

State of Tennessee v. Susan Renee Bise, 380 S.W.3d 682 (Tenn. 2012).

State v. Pike, 978 S.W.2d 904 (Tenn. 1998).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(11) — 30 cases

State v. Pearson, 858 S.W.2d 879 (Tenn. 1993).

State v. Johnson, 970 S.W.2d 500 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996).

State v. Makoka, 885 S.W.2d 366 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994).

State v. Jones, 341 S.W.3d 318 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2010).

State of Tennessee v. Devonte Bonds (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(12) — 23 cases

State v. Freeman, 943 S.W.2d 25 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996). “T.C.A. § 40-35-114 provides for the application of appropriate enhancement factors “if not themselves essential elements of the offense as charged in the indictment.”

State v. Arnett, 49 S.W.3d 250 (Tenn. 2001). “§ 40-35-114(5); (2) expert proof is not required to determine whether psychological injuries inflicted on a victim are “particularly great,” Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114 (6); (3) evidence other than proof of orgasm is required to establish that the defendant raped the victim to…”

State v. Griffis, 964 S.W.2d 577 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-114(4). 107 . Tenn.”

State v. Makoka, 885 S.W.2d 366 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994).

State v. Clabo, 905 S.W.2d 197 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(13) — 65 cases

State v. Robinson, 971 S.W.2d 30 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997).

State v. Shropshire, 874 S.W.2d 634 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1993).

State v. Baker, 956 S.W.2d 8 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997).

State v. Bradfield, 973 S.W.2d 937 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997).

State of Tennessee v. Joel Ernest Blanton (Tenn. Crim. App. 2022).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(13)(A) — 16 cases

State v. Hayes, 894 S.W.2d 298 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994).

State of Tennessee v. Randel Lee Burnett, II (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018).

State of Tennessee v. Gregory Gill (Tenn. Crim. App. 2019).

State of Tennessee v. Joel Ernest Blanton (Tenn. Crim. App. 2022).

State of Tennessee v. Matthew Joseph Carter (Tenn. Crim. App. 2010).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(13)(B) — 5 cases

State v. Smith, 926 S.W.2d 267 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995).

State of Tennessee v. Gregory A. Shaver (Tenn. Crim. App. 2012).

State of Tennessee v. Lee Dewane Watts (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017).

State v. Brian Martin (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997).

State of Tennessee v. Donald Marbley (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(13)(C) — 20 cases

State v. Banks, 271 S.W.3d 90 (Tenn. 2008). “[him] that under the new sentencing law that the court is required to start at the .”

State v. Sims, 909 S.W.2d 46 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995).

State of Tennessee v. Christine Caudle, 388 S.W.3d 273 (Tenn. 2012).

State v. Franklin, 919 S.W.2d 362 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995).

State of Tennessee v. David Lassiter (Tenn. Crim. App. 2019).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(13)(E) — 3 cases

State of Tennessee v. Colton Davon Hatchett (Tenn. Crim. App. 2021).

State of Tennessee v. Martin Ellison Hughes (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018).

State v. Jason C. Carter (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(13)(F) — 3 cases

State of Tennessee v. Randel Lee Burnett, II (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018).

State of Tennessee v. Anthony Cornelius Baylis (Tenn. Crim. App. 2024).

State of Tennessee v. Christopher Seth Haley (Tenn. Crim. App. 2012).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(13)(G) — 3 cases

State of Tennessee v. Randel Lee Burnett, II (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018).

State of Tennessee v. Marcus K. Williams & Corey Zimberlist Rutland, Jr. (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018).

State of Tennessee v. Mitchell Garner (Tenn. Crim. App. 2010).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(13)(H) — 1 case

State of Tennessee v. Robert Wayne Cooper (Tenn. Crim. App. 2012).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(13)(I) — 1 case

State of Tennessee v. Emanuel Bibb Houston (Tenn. Crim. App. 2014).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(13)(b) — 1 case

State of Tennessee v. Randy Joe Richards (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(13)(c) — 4 cases

State of Tennessee v. Jeremiah Emery (Tenn. Crim. App. 2022).

State of Tennessee v. Clifton Williams, Jr. (Tenn. Crim. App. 2013).

Burke v. State (Tenn. Crim. App. 2010).

State of Tennessee v. Jessica Kennedy (Tenn. Crim. App. 2014).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(14) — 101 cases

State v. Banks, 271 S.W.3d 90 (Tenn. 2008). “[him] that under the new sentencing law that the court is required to start at the .”

State v. Bradfield, 973 S.W.2d 937 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997).

State of Tennessee v. Cynthia J. Finch, 465 S.W.3d 584 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2013).

Steven Fults v. Eric Qualls, 635 F. App'x 316 (6th Cir. 2016).

Mark Allen v. Tony Parker, 542 F. App'x 435 (6th Cir. 2013).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(14)(A) — 2 cases

State of Tennessee v. Anthony Lamont Singleton (Tenn. Crim. App. 2004).

State of Tennessee v. Johnny Issac Law (Tenn. Crim. App. 2005).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(14)(B) — 1 case

State of Tennessee v. Buren E. Laney (Tenn. Crim. App. 2003).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(14)(C) — 2 cases

State of Tennessee v. Shawn McCobb & Marcus Walker (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007).

State of Tennessee v.Jeffery Scott Sherrill (Tenn. Crim. App. 2005).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(15) — 47 cases

State v. Gutierrez, 5 S.W.3d 641 (Tenn. 1999).

State v. Adams, 864 S.W.2d 31 (Tenn. 1993). “The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the convictions but reduced the total sentence from eighteen years to eleven years (the statutory minimum) on the basis that there were no applicable enhancement factors as set forth in T.C.A. § 40-35-114. We granted the State’s Rule 11…”

State v. Parker, 932 S.W.2d 945 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996).

State v. Jones, 953 S.W.2d 695 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996).

State v. Franklin, 919 S.W.2d 362 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(15)(1997) — 1 case

State v. Gutierrez, 5 S.W.3d 641 (Tenn. 1999).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(16) — 75 cases

State v. Keel, 882 S.W.2d 410 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994).

State v. Schiefelbein, 230 S.W.3d 88 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007).

State v. Smith, 891 S.W.2d 922 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994).

State v. Jones, 883 S.W.2d 597 (Tenn. 1994). “§ 40-35-114(6), (10), (16) (1990), were “essential elements of the offense charged” and thus proscribed by T.C.A. § 40-35-114 from use as enhancement factors.”

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(16)(2004) — 1 case

State of Tennessee v. Paul Neil Laurent (Tenn. Crim. App. 2006).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(17) — 11 cases

State of West Virginia v. Steward Butler, 799 S.E.2d 718 (W. Va. 2017).

State of Tennessee v. Carlos A. Branch & Edward Allen, Jr. (Tenn. Crim. App. 2009).

State of Tennessee v. Christopher Desmond Simpson (Tenn. Crim. App. 2019).

State of Tennessee v. Roy Michael Ford (Tenn. Crim. App. 2022).

State of Tennessee v. Jacob Allen Reynolds (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(18) — 2 cases

State of Tennessee v. Evangeline Combs & Joseph D. Combs (Tenn. Crim. App. 2002).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(18)(B) — 1 case

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(19) — 5 cases

State of Tennessee v. Timothy Leon Ledford (Tenn. Crim. App. 2021).

State of Tennessee v. Keith Harding Miller (Tenn. Crim. App. 2024).

State of Tennessee v. Ronald Paxton (Tenn. Crim. App. 2003).

State of Tennessee v. Joshua Neil Blair (Tenn. Crim. App. 2025).

State of Tennessee v. Kevin McDougle (Tenn. Crim. App. 2010).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(2) — 224 cases

State v. Banks, 271 S.W.3d 90 (Tenn. 2008). “[him] that under the new sentencing law that the court is required to start at the .”

State v. Gomez, 163 S.W.3d 632 (Tenn. 2005).

State v. Dorantes, 331 S.W.3d 370 (Tenn. 2011).

State v. Robinson, 971 S.W.2d 30 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(2)(2010) — 1 case

State of Tennessee v. Mousen Yisak Aden (Tenn. Crim. App. 2013).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(20) — 16 cases

State v. Jackson, 60 S.W.3d 738 (Tenn. 2001).

State v. Ross, 49 S.W.3d 833 (Tenn. 2001).

State v. Gosnell, 62 S.W.3d 740 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2001).

State v. Adams, 45 S.W.3d 46 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000).

State v. Turner, 41 S.W.3d 663 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(21) — 5 cases

State of Tennessee v. Kenneth Dunlap (Tenn. Crim. App. 2011).

State of Tennessee v. Rodney J. Campbell (Tenn. Crim. App. 2005).

State of Tennessee v. Ronald Lynn Chatman (Tenn. Crim. App. 2005).

State of Tennessee v. Roderick Davis (Tenn. Crim. App. 2004).

State v. Jerry Ray Chandler (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(23) — 1 case

State of Tennessee v. David Wayne Fountain (Tenn. Crim. App. 2003).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(24) — 1 case

State of Tennessee v. Valrie Hart (Tenn. Crim. App. 2022).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(28) — 1 case

State of Tennessee v. Oscar Romero (Tenn. Crim. App. 2026).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(3) — 118 cases

State v. Reid, 91 S.W.3d 247 (Tenn. 2002). “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-114; State v. Nix, 922 S.”

State v. Raines, 882 S.W.2d 376 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(4) — 116 cases

State v. Poole, 945 S.W.2d 93 (Tenn. 1997). “" In imposing the 21-year sentence for especially aggravated robbery, the trial court applied four enhancement factors: the defendant's prior history of criminal convictions and behavior, Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114 (1); the victim was particularly vulnerable due to her age,…”

State v. David E. Walton, Jr., 958 S.W.2d 724 (Tenn. 1997).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(4)(1990) — 1 case

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(5) — 100 cases

State v. Reid, 91 S.W.3d 247 (Tenn. 2002). “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-114; State v. Nix, 922 S.”

State v. Pike, 978 S.W.2d 904 (Tenn. 1998).

State v. Griffis, 964 S.W.2d 577 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-114(4). 107 . Tenn.”

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(6) — 143 cases

State v. Banks, 271 S.W.3d 90 (Tenn. 2008). “[him] that under the new sentencing law that the court is required to start at the .”

State v. Smith, 891 S.W.2d 922 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994).

State v. Griffis, 964 S.W.2d 577 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-114(4). 107 . Tenn.”

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(7) — 106 cases

State v. Alvarado, 961 S.W.2d 136 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114 (stating that the factors listed may be used to enhance a sentence as long as the factors are not themselves essential elements of the offense as charged in the indictment).”

State v. Pike, 978 S.W.2d 904 (Tenn. 1998).

State v. Harris, 866 S.W.2d 583 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1992).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(8) — 198 cases

State v. Ross, 49 S.W.3d 833 (Tenn. 2001).

State v. Schiefelbein, 230 S.W.3d 88 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2007).

State v. Troutman, 979 S.W.2d 271 (Tenn. 1998).

State v. Banks, 271 S.W.3d 90 (Tenn. 2008). “[him] that under the new sentencing law that the court is required to start at the .”

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(9) — 146 cases

State v. Winfield, 23 S.W.3d 279 (Tenn. 2000).

State v. Gosnell, 62 S.W.3d 740 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2001).

State v. Robinson, 971 S.W.2d 30 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997).

State v. Smith, 891 S.W.2d 922 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994).

State v. Raines, 882 S.W.2d 376 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(9)(1997) — 1 case

State v. Gutierrez, 5 S.W.3d 641 (Tenn. 1999).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(a) — 6 cases

State v. Cooper, 977 S.W.2d 130 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1998).

State of Tennessee v. Carlos A. Branch & Edward Allen, Jr. (Tenn. Crim. App. 2009).

Ernest Willard Dodd v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016).

State of Tennessee v. Ebony Marshall (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017).

State v. Cooper (Tenn. Crim. App. 2010).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(b)(2) — 2 cases

State of Tennessee v. Willie Hardy, Jr. - concurring in part, dissenting in part (Tenn. Crim. App. 2017).

State of Tennessee v. George Anthony Flevaris (Tenn. Crim. App. 2013).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(b)(4) — 3 cases

State of Tennessee v. Tobias Senter, a/k/a Toby Senter (Tenn. Crim. App. 2011).

State of Tennessee v. Gregory A. Frye (Tenn. Crim. App. 2009).

State of Tennessee v. Scott Craig (Tenn. Crim. App. 2002).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(b)(5) — 1 case

State of Tennessee v. Jessie Dotson, 450 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. 2014).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(c) — 1 case

Patrick E. Simpson v. State of Tennessee (Tenn. Crim. App. 2004).

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114(c)(2) — 9 cases

State of Tennessee v. Timothy Clark Naifeh (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016).

State of Tennessee v. Quadarius Deshun Martin (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016).

State of Tennessee v. Sylvester Smith (Tenn. Crim. App. 2013).

State of Tennessee v. Aaron Tate (Tenn. Crim. App. 2013).

State of Tennessee v. Jesse Allen Christman (Tenn. Crim. App. 2015).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.