Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-301 (2026)

Fixing of fine by court or jury

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 6.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 63 cases (14 in the last 5 years), 1983–2026 · leading case: State v. Bryant, 805 S.W.2d 762 (Tenn. 1991).
State v. Bryant, 805 S.W.2d 762 (Tenn. 1991). · cites it 22× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-301 (1982) (emphasis added).”
State v. Alvarado, 961 S.W.2d 136 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996). · cites it 4× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-301 ; State v. Mahoney, 874 S.”
State v. Green, 995 S.W.2d 591 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “1041, an amendment to § 40-35-201, which deletes subsection (b) in its entirety and substitutes the following: In all contested criminal cases, except for capital crimes which are governed by the procedures contained in TCÁ §§ 39-13-204 and 39-13-205, and as necessary to comply…”
State v. Blevins, 968 S.W.2d 888 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “See T.C.A. § 40-35-301(b). The trial court’s imposition of a fine, if any, is to be based upon the factors and principles of the 1989 Sentencing Act, such as, prior history, potential for rehabilitation, financial means, and mitigating and enhancing factors, that are relevant to…”
State v. King, 973 S.W.2d 586 (Tenn. 1998). · cites it 2× “1041, an amendment to § 40-35-201 which deletes subsection (b) in its entirety and substitutes the following: In all contested criminal cases, except for capital crimes which are governed by the procedures contained in TCA §§ 39-13-204 and 39-13-205, and as necessary to comply…”
State v. Durso, 645 S.W.2d 753 (Tenn. 1983). · cites it 2× “See especially T.C.A. § 40-35-301(b), providing that upon waiver of a jury, the trial judge may lawfully “fix the fine at any amount which the jury could have.”
State v. Sanders, 735 S.W.2d 856 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “Absent one of these ex ceptions a trial judge must follow the procedure mandated by T.C.A. § 40-35-301(b). Since neither of these exceptions appears in the record presented to us for review, we are of the opinion the trial judge exceeded his jurisdiction in fining the defendant…”
State v. Godsey, 165 S.W.3d 667 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “The Tennessee constitution requires that a jury fix the fíne where the fine is assessed as punishment for an offense and is in excess of fifty dollars.”
State v. Thomas, 691 S.W.2d 571 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “T.C.A. § 40-35-301(b) provides that in the absence of a waiver of the right to have a jury fix the fine, the trial court may not impose a fine which exceeds that fixed by the jury.”
Anthony Perry v. Tennessee Dep't of Corr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 10× “]” Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-301 (a) (“Except as provided in subsection (c) and with respect to fines as provided in § 40-35-301, sentences in felony and misdemeanor cases shall be imposed by the court.”
State of Tennessee v. Eric D. Crenshaw (Tenn. Crim. App. 2016). · cites it 6× “VI, § 14; see T.C.A. § 40-35-301(b) (2014). A “defendant may waive the right to have a jury fix the fine and agree that the court fix it, in which case the court may lawfully fix the fine at any amount that the jury could have.”
State of Tennessee v. Parnell Quinn Short (Tenn. Crim. App. 2026). · cites it 6× “T.C.A. § 40-35-301(b) (2019). Our supreme court has said that fines imposed as part of a criminal sentence are to be reviewed in the same manner as other aspects of the sentence.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-301(b) — 22 cases
State v. Bryant, 805 S.W.2d 762 (Tenn. 1991). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-301 (1982) (emphasis added).”
State v. Blevins, 968 S.W.2d 888 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997). “See T.C.A. § 40-35-301(b). The trial court’s imposition of a fine, if any, is to be based upon the factors and principles of the 1989 Sentencing Act, such as, prior history, potential for rehabilitation, financial means, and mitigating and enhancing factors, that are relevant to…”
State v. Durso, 645 S.W.2d 753 (Tenn. 1983). “See especially T.C.A. § 40-35-301(b), providing that upon waiver of a jury, the trial judge may lawfully “fix the fine at any amount which the jury could have.”
State v. Sanders, 735 S.W.2d 856 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1987). “Absent one of these ex ceptions a trial judge must follow the procedure mandated by T.C.A. § 40-35-301(b). Since neither of these exceptions appears in the record presented to us for review, we are of the opinion the trial judge exceeded his jurisdiction in fining the defendant…”
State v. Thomas, 691 S.W.2d 571 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1985). “T.C.A. § 40-35-301(b) provides that in the absence of a waiver of the right to have a jury fix the fine, the trial court may not impose a fine which exceeds that fixed by the jury.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.