Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-302 (2026)

Misdemeanor sentencing - Rehabilitative program credits - Probation - Supervision of defendants on probation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 688,s 131, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 743,s 1, eff. 4/22/2024.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 358, s 1, eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 244, s 1, eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 148, Secs.s 1, s 2 eff. 4/17/2019.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 917, s 2, eff. 5/1/2018.

Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 6; 1990, ch. 1030, § 37; 1991, ch. 458, § 1; 1997 , ch. 408, §§ 1-4; 2000, ch. 827, § 1; 2000, ch. 947, § 8J; 2001, ch. 359, § 1; 2002, ch. 802, § 1; 2007 , ch. 158, § 1; 2009 , ch. 124, § 1; 2011 , ch. 319, §§ 1, 2; 2012 , ch. 727, § 44.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 379 cases (25 in the last 5 years), 1983–2026 · leading case: State v. Troutman, 979 S.W.2d 271 (Tenn. 1998).
State v. Troutman, 979 S.W.2d 271 (Tenn. 1998). · cites it 34× “Misdemeanor sentencing guidelines are codified at Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-302 and provide in pertinent part: In imposing a misdemeanor sentence, the court shall fix a percentage of the sentence which the defendant shall serve [in confinement].”
State v. Palmer, 902 S.W.2d 391 (Tenn. 1995). · cites it 12× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-302 (1994 Supp.). It reiterates that the misdemeanor defendant’s sentence “shall [be] consistent with the purposes and principles” of the Act.”
State v. Creasy, 885 S.W.2d 829 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994). · cites it 10× “T.C.A. § 40-35-302(a). The sentence must be specific and consistent with the purpose and principles of the Criminal Sentencing Reform Act of 1989.”
State v. Cooper, 336 S.W.3d 522 (Tenn. 2011). · cites it 12× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-302(b) (2006 & Supp.”
State v. Humphreys, 70 S.W.3d 752 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2001). · cites it 8× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-302(a) (1997). Misdemeanor sentencing is controlled by Tenn.”
State v. Webb, 130 S.W.3d 799 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2003). · cites it 9× “Compare Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-302 (“to consider the purpose of this chapter, the principles of sentencing, and the enhancement and mitigating factors set forth herein”) with Tenn.”
State v. Russell, 10 S.W.3d 270 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). · cites it 8× “” Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 40-35-302(d) (1997); Troutman, 979 S.”
State v. Adams, 238 S.W.3d 313 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2005). · cites it 10× “Misdemeanor sentencing is controlled by Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-302, which provides in part that the trial court shall impose a specific sentence consistent with the purposes and principles of the 1989 Criminal Sentencing Reform Act.”
State v. Johnson, 15 S.W.3d 515 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). · cites it 6× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-103 (l)(C). The trial court did not err by considering defendant’s conduct while on judicial diversion/probation in sentencing the defendant.”
State v. Boyd, 925 S.W.2d 237 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995). · cites it 6× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-302 (b). The trial court retains the authority to place the Defendant on probation either immediately or after a period of periodic or continuous confinement.”
State v. Coolidge, 915 S.W.2d 820 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995). · cites it 10× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-302(b). A percentage of not greater than 75% of the sentence should be fixed for service after which the defendant becomes eligible for “work release, furlough, trusty status, and related rehabilitative programs.”
State v. Wood, 91 S.W.3d 769 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 6× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-302 (d) requires the court to set a percentage of the misdemeanor sentence (not to exceed seventy-five percent) which the defendant shall serve, and Tenn.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-302(a) — 64 cases
State v. Troutman, 979 S.W.2d 271 (Tenn. 1998). “Misdemeanor sentencing guidelines are codified at Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-302 and provide in pertinent part: In imposing a misdemeanor sentence, the court shall fix a percentage of the sentence which the defendant shall serve [in confinement].”
State v. Humphreys, 70 S.W.3d 752 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2001). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-302(a) (1997). Misdemeanor sentencing is controlled by Tenn.”
State v. Creasy, 885 S.W.2d 829 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994). “T.C.A. § 40-35-302(a). The sentence must be specific and consistent with the purpose and principles of the Criminal Sentencing Reform Act of 1989.”
State v. Boyd, 925 S.W.2d 237 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-302 (b). The trial court retains the authority to place the Defendant on probation either immediately or after a period of periodic or continuous confinement.”
State v. McKnight, 900 S.W.2d 36 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-302(a)(1996) — 1 case
State v. Timothy Wayne Reece (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-302(b) — 55 cases
State v. Creasy, 885 S.W.2d 829 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994). “T.C.A. § 40-35-302(a). The sentence must be specific and consistent with the purpose and principles of the Criminal Sentencing Reform Act of 1989.”
State v. Cooper, 336 S.W.3d 522 (Tenn. 2011). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-302(b) (2006 & Supp.”
State v. Bult, 989 S.W.2d 730 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1998).
State v. Seaton, 914 S.W.2d 129 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995).
State v. Adams, 238 S.W.3d 313 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2005). “Misdemeanor sentencing is controlled by Tennessee Code Annotated section 40-35-302, which provides in part that the trial court shall impose a specific sentence consistent with the purposes and principles of the 1989 Criminal Sentencing Reform Act.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-302(c) — 2 cases
State v. Smith, 909 S.W.2d 471 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995).
State of Tennessee v. Thomas Bolton (Tenn. Crim. App. 2014).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-302(d) — 110 cases
State v. Troutman, 979 S.W.2d 271 (Tenn. 1998). “Misdemeanor sentencing guidelines are codified at Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-302 and provide in pertinent part: In imposing a misdemeanor sentence, the court shall fix a percentage of the sentence which the defendant shall serve [in confinement].”
State v. Creasy, 885 S.W.2d 829 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994). “T.C.A. § 40-35-302(a). The sentence must be specific and consistent with the purpose and principles of the Criminal Sentencing Reform Act of 1989.”
State v. Russell, 10 S.W.3d 270 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999). “” Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 40-35-302(d) (1997); Troutman, 979 S.”
State v. Palmer, 902 S.W.2d 391 (Tenn. 1995). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-302 (1994 Supp.). It reiterates that the misdemeanor defendant’s sentence “shall [be] consistent with the purposes and principles” of the Act.”
State v. Cooper, 336 S.W.3d 522 (Tenn. 2011). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-302(b) (2006 & Supp.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-302(d)(1997) — 1 case
State v. Gregory Battles (Tenn. Crim. App. 1999).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-302(e) — 33 cases
State v. Humphreys, 70 S.W.3d 752 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2001). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-302(a) (1997). Misdemeanor sentencing is controlled by Tenn.”
State v. Boyd, 925 S.W.2d 237 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-302 (b). The trial court retains the authority to place the Defendant on probation either immediately or after a period of periodic or continuous confinement.”
State v. Webb, 130 S.W.3d 799 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2003). “Compare Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-302 (“to consider the purpose of this chapter, the principles of sentencing, and the enhancement and mitigating factors set forth herein”) with Tenn.”
State v. Cooper, 336 S.W.3d 522 (Tenn. 2011). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-302(b) (2006 & Supp.”
State v. Combs, 945 S.W.2d 770 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-302(e)(l) — 1 case
State v. Gennoe, 851 S.W.2d 833 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-302(f) — 4 cases
State v. Coolidge, 915 S.W.2d 820 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-35-302(b). A percentage of not greater than 75% of the sentence should be fixed for service after which the defendant becomes eligible for “work release, furlough, trusty status, and related rehabilitative programs.”
State v. Dockery, 917 S.W.2d 258 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-302(g)(1)(B) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.