Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 41-24-109 (2026)

Monitoring of contractor performance - Reports

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In addition to other powers and duties prescribed by law, the commissioner shall monitor any contracts with prison contractors providing correctional services and shall report at least annually, or as requested, to the state and local government committee of the senate and the state government committee of the house of representatives or any other legislative committee regarding the performance of the contractor. The comptroller of the treasury shall audit the performance of the department of correction and the private contractor to ensure that the state is receiving the quality and level of services as described in the contract based upon the performance criteria, the monitoring process and any applicable sanctions that might be incurred. The comptroller shall report annually, or as otherwise requested, to the state and local government committee of the senate and the state government committee of the house of representatives.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 64, s 65, eff. 3/29/2021.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 345, s 75, eff. 5/10/2019.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 236, s 64, eff. 4/19/2013.

Acts 1986, ch. 932, § 9; 2001, ch. 132, §8; 2011 , ch. 410, § 2(q), (r).


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2009–2009 · leading case: Friedmann v. Corr. Corp. of Am., 310 S.W.3d 366 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009).
Friedmann v. Corr. Corp. of Am., 310 S.W.3d 366 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 41-24-109 (2006) provides as follows: Monitoring of contractor performance— Reports.”
Alex Friedmann v. Corr. Corp. of Am. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “– No contract for correctional services shall authorize, allow or imply a delegation of the authority or responsibility of the commissioner to a prison contractor for any of the following: (1) Developing and implementing procedures for calculating inmate release and parole…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.