Tenn. Code Ann. » Tenn. Code / Title 47 / Chapter 1 / Part 1
Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-1-101 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 2008, ch. 930, § 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1966–2025 · leading case: C-Wood Lumber Co. v. Wayne Cnty. Bank, 233 S.W.3d 263 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
C-Wood Lumber Co. v. Wayne Cnty. Bank, 233 S.W.3d 263 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “Acts 243 (originally codified at Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 47-1-101 through 47-9-507 (1964)).”
Bank of Crockett v. Cullipher, 752 S.W.2d 84 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “, codified at T.C.A. § 47-1-101, et seq., and more specifically § 47-1-102(3), which reads: (3) The effect of provisions of chapters 1 through 9 of this title may be varied by agreement, except as otherwise provided in chapters 1 through 9 of this title and except that the…”
McConnico v. Third Nat'l Bank in Nashville, 499 S.W.2d 874 (Tenn. 1973). · cites it 4× “In applying the correct limitation period, we look first to our state enactments of the Uniform Commercial Code, T.C.A. § 47-1-101 et seq. The only possible applicable limitation therein appears in T.”
Union Planters Nat. Bank of Memphis v. Markowitz, 468 F. Supp. 529 (W.D. Tenn. 1979). · cites it 2× “*534 Defendant Markowitz’s argument primarily rests on certain provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), T.C.A. § 47-1-101 et seq. T.C.A. § 47-9-207 provides: (1) A secured party must use reasonable care in the custody and preservation of collateral in his possession.”
Com. Union Bank v. Burger-In-A-Pouch, Inc., 657 S.W.2d 88 (Tenn. 1983). · cites it 2× “It arises under the uniform negotiable instrument law, a part of the Uniform Commercial Code, T.C.A. §§ 47-1-101 et seq. It involves a $24,900 promissory note of a corporation first named Burger-in-a-Pouch, a name later changed to Best of Both, and a surety contract signed by…”
Intertherm, Inc. v. Olympic Homes Sys., Inc., 569 S.W.2d 467 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 2× “Defendants devote the first part of their brief to the argument that they have met the requirements of Tennessee’s version of the Uniform Commercial Code, T.C.A. § 47-1-101 et seq., for a security interest in Olympic’s inventory and priority over its general creditors.”
Apex Oil Co. v. Tims (In Re Armstrong), 56 B.R. 781 (W.D. Tenn. 1986). · cites it 2× “Tims may have is governed by the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), as enacted by Tennessee, Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-1-101 et seq (1979). Because Mrs.”
G.M.L., Inc. v. Mayhew, 188 F. Supp. 2d 891 (M.D. Tenn. 2002). · cites it 2× “§ 39-14-139 by knowingly advertising, selling, transporting, and possessing with the intent to sell, for commercial advantage, a recorded device containing live performances while knowing that the live performances were recorded or stored without the plaintiffs consent; (5)…”
Shoney's, Inc. & Shoney's of Canada, Inc. v. Chic Can Enter., LTD., an Alberta Corp., Chic Can Enter., an Alberta LTD Ptrshp, 922 S.W.2d 530 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “Except as expressly inconsistent therewith, this agreement, as described in paragraph 1 above, shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the provisions of the Tennessee Uniform Commercial Code, T.CA. §§ 47-1-101, et seq. Including all definitions contained therein.”
Stringfellow v. First Am. Nat'l Bank, 878 S.W.2d 940 (Tenn. 1994). · cites it 2× “See Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 47-1-101 through 47-9-607 (1992) and Uniform Commercial Code, Table of Adopting Jurisdictions, 2 U.”
Locke v. Woods (In Re Woods), 25 B.R. 924 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1982). · cites it 2× “Tennessee’s version of the Uniform Commercial Code is found in Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 47-1-101- -9-507. 2 . Professors White and Summers disagree.”
Data Gen. Corp. v. Still (In Re Ault), 6 B.R. 58 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1980). “§§ 47-1-101 - -9-507. For convenience UCC sections will be cited without the title number (47).”
Show all 21 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.