Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-14-102 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The following terms have the following meanings, subject to additional definitions, specifications and limitations contained in other statutes relating to particular categories of lenders or of transactions:

Acts 1979, ch. 203, § 1; 1983, ch. 464, § 1; 2006, ch. 565, §§ 1, 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1979–2025 · leading case: Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Lum (In Re Lum), 1 B.R. 186 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1979).
Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Lum (In Re Lum), 1 B.R. 186 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1979). · cites it 4× “For purposes of this memorandum and orders pursuant to it “effective rate of interest” is defined in Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-14-102(2) (Repl.Vol.1979).”
Williams v. Firstplus Home Loan Owner Trust 1998-4, 310 F. Supp. 2d 981 (W.D. Tenn. 2004). · cites it 4× “All Plaintiffs allege that Defendants violated (1) the Tennessee statutory limits on interest, see Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 47-14-102, 47-14-103, 47-15-102; Tenn.”
In Re Caudle, 13 B.R. 29 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 1981). · cites it 4× “But, having considered the creditor’s argument, its contract, and the Tennessee statutes, being not wholly removed from economic concerns, and being required to make a decision, it is the opinion of the court that GMAC is entitled to be paid an effective rate of interest of 10%…”
Vooys v. Turner, 49 S.W.3d 318 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “Interest is defined in Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-14-102(7) as “compensation for the use or detention of, or forbearance to collect, money over a period of time.”
In Re Strong, 12 B.R. 221 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 1981). · cites it 4× “But, having considered the creditor’s argument, its contract, and the Tennessee statutes, being not wholly removed from economic concerns, and being required to make a decision, it is the opinion of the court that GMAC is entitled to be paid an effective rate of interest of 10%…”
Pac. E. Corp. v. Gulf Life Holding Co., 902 S.W.2d 946 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995). “§ 47-14-102(7) (1988) defines “interest” as “compensation for the use or detention of, or forbearance to collect, money over a period of time, and does not include compensation for other purposes, including, but not limited to, time-price differentials, loan charges, brokerage…”
Terry v. Cmty. Bank of N. Virginia, 255 F. Supp. 2d 817 (W.D. Tenn. 2003). · cites it 3× “1 The amended complaint alleges violations of Tennessee Code Annotated Sections 47-14-102, 47-14-103, 47-14-112, 47-14-113, 47-14-117, 47-15-103 and 47-15-104, the Rules of the Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions, chapter 0180-17, the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act…”
Mull v. All. Mortg. Banking Corp., 219 F. Supp. 2d 895 (W.D. Tenn. 2002). “(“Mortgage Lenders”) and plaintiff class members, and the mortgage notes violate the Tennessee statutory limitations on interest, loan origination fees, loan brokerage commissions and/or other loan charges established in Tennessee Code Annotated sections 47-14-102, 47-14-103,…”
Whitsey v. Williamson Cnty. Bank, 700 S.W.2d 562 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 2× “The Bank failed to furnish to plaintiffs the information required to be furnished by the Truth in Lending Act and TCA §§ 47-14-102 and 47-14-201. 4. The Bank advertised and sold plaintiffs’ property to the defendants Gentry.”
Owens v. State, 710 S.W.2d 518 (Tenn. 1986). · cites it 2× “See T.C.A. § 47-14-102(7). This definition is not consistent with the nature of a fine, which is imposed as punishment for the commission of a criminal offense.”
Williams v. FirstPlus Home Loan Trust 1996-2, 209 F.R.D. 404 (W.D. Tenn. 2002). “Plaintiffs allege that defendants are current holders or assignees of certain second mortgage notes between FirstPlus Group and plaintiff class members, and the mortgage notes violate the Tennessee statutory limitations on interest, loan origination fees, loan brokerage…”
Terry v. Cmty. Bank of N. Virginia, 255 F. Supp. 2d 811 (W.D. Tenn. 2003). “1 The amended complaint alleges violations of Tennessee Code Annotated Sections 47-14-102, 47-14-103, 47-14-112, 47-14-113, 47-14-117, 47-15-103 and 47-15-104, the Rules of the Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions, chapter 0180-17, the Tennessee Consumer Protection…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-14-102(1) — 1 case
In Re Clausel, 32 B.R. 805 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 1983).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-14-102(10) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-14-102(2) — 3 cases
Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Lum (In Re Lum), 1 B.R. 186 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1979). “For purposes of this memorandum and orders pursuant to it “effective rate of interest” is defined in Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-14-102(2) (Repl.Vol.1979).”
In Re Caudle, 13 B.R. 29 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 1981). “But, having considered the creditor’s argument, its contract, and the Tennessee statutes, being not wholly removed from economic concerns, and being required to make a decision, it is the opinion of the court that GMAC is entitled to be paid an effective rate of interest of 10%…”
In Re Strong, 12 B.R. 221 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 1981). “But, having considered the creditor’s argument, its contract, and the Tennessee statutes, being not wholly removed from economic concerns, and being required to make a decision, it is the opinion of the court that GMAC is entitled to be paid an effective rate of interest of 10%…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-14-102(3) — 2 cases
Farinash v. Henry, Jr. (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2022).
Sake, LLC v. Cain (M.D. Tenn. 2025).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-14-102(5) — 3 cases
Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Lum (In Re Lum), 1 B.R. 186 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1979). “For purposes of this memorandum and orders pursuant to it “effective rate of interest” is defined in Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-14-102(2) (Repl.Vol.1979).”
In Re Caudle, 13 B.R. 29 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 1981). “But, having considered the creditor’s argument, its contract, and the Tennessee statutes, being not wholly removed from economic concerns, and being required to make a decision, it is the opinion of the court that GMAC is entitled to be paid an effective rate of interest of 10%…”
In Re Strong, 12 B.R. 221 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 1981). “But, having considered the creditor’s argument, its contract, and the Tennessee statutes, being not wholly removed from economic concerns, and being required to make a decision, it is the opinion of the court that GMAC is entitled to be paid an effective rate of interest of 10%…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-14-102(7) — 9 cases
Vooys v. Turner, 49 S.W.3d 318 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “Interest is defined in Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-14-102(7) as “compensation for the use or detention of, or forbearance to collect, money over a period of time.”
Pac. E. Corp. v. Gulf Life Holding Co., 902 S.W.2d 946 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995). “§ 47-14-102(7) (1988) defines “interest” as “compensation for the use or detention of, or forbearance to collect, money over a period of time, and does not include compensation for other purposes, including, but not limited to, time-price differentials, loan charges, brokerage…”
Owens v. State, 710 S.W.2d 518 (Tenn. 1986). “See T.C.A. § 47-14-102(7). This definition is not consistent with the nature of a fine, which is imposed as punishment for the commission of a criminal offense.”
Terry v. Cmty. Bank of N. Virginia, 255 F. Supp. 2d 817 (W.D. Tenn. 2003). “1 The amended complaint alleges violations of Tennessee Code Annotated Sections 47-14-102, 47-14-103, 47-14-112, 47-14-113, 47-14-117, 47-15-103 and 47-15-104, the Rules of the Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions, chapter 0180-17, the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act…”
Farinash v. Henry, Jr. (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2022).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-14-102(8) — 2 cases
Terry v. Cmty. Bank of N. Virginia, 255 F. Supp. 2d 817 (W.D. Tenn. 2003). “1 The amended complaint alleges violations of Tennessee Code Annotated Sections 47-14-102, 47-14-103, 47-14-112, 47-14-113, 47-14-117, 47-15-103 and 47-15-104, the Rules of the Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions, chapter 0180-17, the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.