Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-4-403 (2026)

Customer's right to stop payment - Burden of proof of loss

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1963, ch. 81, § 1 (4-403); 1995, ch. 397, § 3.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2021 · leading case: Stringfellow v. First Am. Nat'l Bank, 878 S.W.2d 940 (Tenn. 1994).
Stringfellow v. First Am. Nat'l Bank, 878 S.W.2d 940 (Tenn. 1994). · cites it 2× “If a payor bank has paid an item over the stop payment order of the drawer or maker or otherwise under circumstances giving a basis for objection by the drawer or maker, to prevent unjust enrichment and only to the extent necessary to prevent loss to the bank by reason of its…”
Harpeth Fin. Servs., LLC v. Jim Clay Pinson, Jr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-4-403 (a) (2001) (allowing a “customer or any person authorized to draw” on a bank account to “stop payment of any item drawn on the .”
Niccole A. Naifeh v. Valley Forge Life Ins. Co. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “The statute governing the transfer at issue in this case does not state that an oral cancellation of an electronic transfer lapses after fourteen days as it would, for example, with a check under section 47-4-403(b) of the Tennessee Code.”
Curtis Morris v. Amsouth Bank (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). “Moreover, the Tennessee Uniform Commercial Code grants AmSouth a statutory right to disgorge funds that have been obtained through mistake or fraud: (a) Except as provided in subsection (c), if the drawee of a draft pays or accepts the draft and the drawee acted on the mistaken…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-4-403(b) — 1 case
Niccole A. Naifeh v. Valley Forge Life Ins. Co. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “The statute governing the transfer at issue in this case does not state that an oral cancellation of an electronic transfer lapses after fourteen days as it would, for example, with a check under section 47-4-403(b) of the Tennessee Code.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.