Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-9-503 (2026)

Name of debtor and secured party

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 2000, ch. 846, § 1; 2008, ch. 648, § 1; 2008, ch. 1109, §§ 1, 2; 2012, ch. 708, § 13.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases, 1968–2009 · leading case: Davenport v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 818 S.W.2d 23 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991).
Davenport v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 818 S.W.2d 23 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 19× “We now consider whether the repossession of the Davenports’ automobile was consistent with Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-9-503 (1979). The trial court determined that it was, relying on Harris Truck & Trailer Sales v.”
McCall v. Owens, 820 S.W.2d 748 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 4× “The trial judge overruled a motion for a new trial except Ted D. Owens was granted a new trial.”
First Cmty. Bank v. Jones (In Re Silver Dollar, LLC), 388 B.R. 317 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2008). · cites it 22× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-9-503 cmt. 2. The Trustee argues in his motion for summary judgment that the Bank’s financing statements do not sufficiently list the name of the Debtor because it sets forth the Debtor’s assumed name, Silver Dollar Stores, LLC, rather than the name under…”
Clark v. Assocs. Com. Corp., 877 F. Supp. 1439 (D. Kan. 1994). · cites it 7× “Plaintiff claims that, during the course of the repossession, Associates violated its statutory duty under Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-9-503 not to breach the peace.”
Off. Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of Propex Inc. v. BNP Paribas (In Re Propex Inc.), 415 B.R. 321 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2009). · cites it 2× ““[A] financing statement that fails sufficiently to provide the name of the debtor in accordance with § 47-9-503(a) is seriously misleading.” Id.”
Lane v. John Deere Co., 767 S.W.2d 138 (Tenn. 1989). · cites it 2× “§ 47-1-207, that the dealer’s oral representations to Plaintiffs are not enforceable, T.”
Harris Truck & Trailer Sales v. Foote, 436 S.W.2d 460 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1968). · cites it 4× “section 47-9-503, ’ which is part of the Uniform Commercial Code, provides: “Unless otherwise agreed a secured party has on default the right to the possession of the collateral.”
Trimble v. Sonitrol of Memphis, Inc., 723 S.W.2d 633 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “Upon a finding that Trimble was a secured creditor, T.C.A. § 47-9-503 gives him the right to take possession of the collateral if it is done without breach of the peace, and the court found that Trimble took over the collateral in a proper manner.”
Kinch v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 367 F. Supp. 436 (E.D. Tenn. 1973). · cites it 5× “§ 47-9-503, which recognizes the right of a secured party to use self-help in repossessing collateral upon default under the security agreement, and that (3) this action was “state action” within *438 the purview of the Fourteenth Amendment. Before reaching the issue of whether…”
King v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. (In Re King), 14 B.R. 316 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1981). · cites it 2× “On or about January 10, 1981, defendants repossessed the vehicle according to rights granted by T.C.A. § 47-9-503. Subsequently plaintiffs on January 16,1981, filed a petition for relief under Chapter 13 of Title 11.”
Lynn v. Fin. Solutions Corp. (In Re Lynn), 173 B.R. 894 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1994). · cites it 2× “T.C.A. § 47-9-503 (1992). Upon repossession of the collateral, T.”
Walker v. Assocs. Com. Corp., 673 S.W.2d 517 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “Walker further asserts that Taylor acting for Associates was guilty of promissory fraud by his action in orálly granting Walker an extension of time within which to make the installment and then repossessing the truck.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-9-503(a) — 2 cases
Off. Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of Propex Inc. v. BNP Paribas (In Re Propex Inc.), 415 B.R. 321 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2009). ““[A] financing statement that fails sufficiently to provide the name of the debtor in accordance with § 47-9-503(a) is seriously misleading.” Id.”
First Cmty. Bank v. Jones (In Re Silver Dollar, LLC), 388 B.R. 317 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2008). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-9-503 cmt. 2. The Trustee argues in his motion for summary judgment that the Bank’s financing statements do not sufficiently list the name of the Debtor because it sets forth the Debtor’s assumed name, Silver Dollar Stores, LLC, rather than the name under…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-9-503(a)(1) — 1 case
First Cmty. Bank v. Jones (In Re Silver Dollar, LLC), 388 B.R. 317 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2008). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-9-503 cmt. 2. The Trustee argues in his motion for summary judgment that the Bank’s financing statements do not sufficiently list the name of the Debtor because it sets forth the Debtor’s assumed name, Silver Dollar Stores, LLC, rather than the name under…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-9-503(a)(l) — 1 case
First Cmty. Bank v. Jones (In Re Silver Dollar, LLC), 388 B.R. 317 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2008). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-9-503 cmt. 2. The Trustee argues in his motion for summary judgment that the Bank’s financing statements do not sufficiently list the name of the Debtor because it sets forth the Debtor’s assumed name, Silver Dollar Stores, LLC, rather than the name under…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-9-503(c) — 1 case
First Cmty. Bank v. Jones (In Re Silver Dollar, LLC), 388 B.R. 317 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2008). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-9-503 cmt. 2. The Trustee argues in his motion for summary judgment that the Bank’s financing statements do not sufficiently list the name of the Debtor because it sets forth the Debtor’s assumed name, Silver Dollar Stores, LLC, rather than the name under…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-9-503(e) — 1 case
First Cmty. Bank v. Jones (In Re Silver Dollar, LLC), 388 B.R. 317 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2008). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-9-503 cmt. 2. The Trustee argues in his motion for summary judgment that the Bank’s financing statements do not sufficiently list the name of the Debtor because it sets forth the Debtor’s assumed name, Silver Dollar Stores, LLC, rather than the name under…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.