Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-2-303 (2026)

School principals

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1974, ch. 542, §§ 1, 2; 1983, ch. 362, § 2; T.C.A., §§ 49-253, 49-254; Acts 1989, ch. 199, § 3; 1990, ch. 948, § 4; 1992, ch. 535, §§ 17, 18; 1996, ch. 988, § 10; 2007 , ch. 376, §§ 3, 4; 2010 (1st Ex. Sess.), ch. 2, § 11.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases, 2000–2020 · leading case: Marion Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Marion Cnty. Educ. Ass'n, 86 S.W.3d 202 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001).
Marion Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Marion Cnty. Educ. Ass'n, 86 S.W.3d 202 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 12× “9 Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-2-303 (a)(l) (footnotes added).”
Hicks v. Benton Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 222 F. Supp. 3d 613 (W.D. Tenn. 2016). · cites it 8× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-2-303 (b)(1)-(3), (5), (7)(A).”
Knox Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Knox Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 60 S.W.3d 65 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 6× “See T.C.A. § 49-2-303(a). All other matters related *79 to the employment of principals, remained in the authority of boards of education: Under the EIA, principals negotiate with the superintendents — now known as “directors of schools” — regarding matters related to…”
Mike Allmand v. Jon Pavletic, 292 S.W.3d 618 (Tenn. 2009). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-2-303 (a)(1) (2002 & Supp.”
Arnwine v. Union Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 120 S.W.3d 804 (Tenn. 2003). “In contrast, the statutes provide scant guidance regarding assistant superintendents, as the only mention of “assistant superintendent” appears in Tennessee Code Annotated section 49-5-903 (1996), which designates employees covered by local retirement systems.”
Davidson v. Arlington Cmty. Sch. Bd. of Educ. (W.D. Tenn. 2020). · cites it 18× “) In support of that position, Plaintiff argues that her contract lacked “student achievement data as required by T.C.A. § 49-2-303(a).” (ECF No. 41 at PageID 1101.”
Esquinance v. Polk Cnty. Educ. Ass'n, 195 S.W.3d 35 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “(5) Notwithstanding other provisions of this title to the contrary, directors of schools shall have the ultimate right to transfer all professional employees subject only to §§ 49-2-303 and 49-5-510. Nothing in this section shall be construed to make transfers or assignments…”
Stephen P. Geller v. Henry Cnty. Bd. of Educ. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 6× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-2-303 (a)(7)(A). These tasks include lunchroom duty, bus duty, and other related activities.”
Wilson Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Wilson Cnty. Educ. Ass'n & Steve Johnson (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 8× “The trial court granted summary judgment to the school board, concluding that Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-2-303 applied since “assistant principals” are statutorily the same as “principals” and, under the holding in Marion County Board of Education v.”
Knox Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Knox Cnty. Bd. of Educ. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 8× “See T.C.A. § 49-2-303(a). All other matters related to the employment of principals, remained in the authority of boards of education: -13- Under the EIA, principals negotiate with the superintendents – now known as “directors of schools” – regarding matters related to…”
Marion Co. Bd. of Educ. v. Marion Co. Educ. Assoc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 10× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-2-301 (f)(1)(EE).7 Additionally, and more specifically, Tenn.”
Wilson Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Wilson Cnty. Educ. Ass'n & Bill Repsher (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 6× “On what ultimately became cross motions for summary judgment, the trial court concluded that Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-2-303 included “assistant principals” and, consequently, under the holding of Marion County Board of Education v.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-2-303(a) — 3 cases
Knox Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Knox Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 60 S.W.3d 65 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “See T.C.A. § 49-2-303(a). All other matters related *79 to the employment of principals, remained in the authority of boards of education: Under the EIA, principals negotiate with the superintendents — now known as “directors of schools” — regarding matters related to…”
Davidson v. Arlington Cmty. Sch. Bd. of Educ. (W.D. Tenn. 2020). “) In support of that position, Plaintiff argues that her contract lacked “student achievement data as required by T.C.A. § 49-2-303(a).” (ECF No. 41 at PageID 1101.”
Knox Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Knox Cnty. Bd. of Educ. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “See T.C.A. § 49-2-303(a). All other matters related to the employment of principals, remained in the authority of boards of education: -13- Under the EIA, principals negotiate with the superintendents – now known as “directors of schools” – regarding matters related to…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-2-303(a)(1) — 5 cases
Marion Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Marion Cnty. Educ. Ass'n, 86 S.W.3d 202 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “9 Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-2-303 (a)(l) (footnotes added).”
Davidson v. Arlington Cmty. Sch. Bd. of Educ. (W.D. Tenn. 2020). “) In support of that position, Plaintiff argues that her contract lacked “student achievement data as required by T.C.A. § 49-2-303(a).” (ECF No. 41 at PageID 1101.”
Knox Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Knox Cnty. Bd. of Educ. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “See T.C.A. § 49-2-303(a). All other matters related to the employment of principals, remained in the authority of boards of education: -13- Under the EIA, principals negotiate with the superintendents – now known as “directors of schools” – regarding matters related to…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-2-303(a)(l) — 4 cases
Marion Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Marion Cnty. Educ. Ass'n, 86 S.W.3d 202 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “9 Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-2-303 (a)(l) (footnotes added).”
Knox Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Knox Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 60 S.W.3d 65 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “See T.C.A. § 49-2-303(a). All other matters related *79 to the employment of principals, remained in the authority of boards of education: Under the EIA, principals negotiate with the superintendents — now known as “directors of schools” — regarding matters related to…”
Arnwine v. Union Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 120 S.W.3d 804 (Tenn. 2003). “In contrast, the statutes provide scant guidance regarding assistant superintendents, as the only mention of “assistant superintendent” appears in Tennessee Code Annotated section 49-5-903 (1996), which designates employees covered by local retirement systems.”
Davidson v. Arlington Cmty. Sch. Bd. of Educ. (W.D. Tenn. 2020). “) In support of that position, Plaintiff argues that her contract lacked “student achievement data as required by T.C.A. § 49-2-303(a).” (ECF No. 41 at PageID 1101.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-2-303(b) — 1 case
Hicks v. Benton Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 222 F. Supp. 3d 613 (W.D. Tenn. 2016). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-2-303 (b)(1)-(3), (5), (7)(A).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-2-303(b)(1) — 1 case
Hicks v. Benton Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 222 F. Supp. 3d 613 (W.D. Tenn. 2016). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-2-303 (b)(1)-(3), (5), (7)(A).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-2-303(b)(2) — 1 case
Hicks v. Benton Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 222 F. Supp. 3d 613 (W.D. Tenn. 2016). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-2-303 (b)(1)-(3), (5), (7)(A).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.