Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-5-602 (2026)

Part definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this part, unless the context otherwise requires:

Acts 1978, ch. 570, § 3; T.C.A., § 49-5502; Acts 1987, ch. 308, § 28; 2000, ch. 903, § 4.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1996–2025 · leading case: Lawrence Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Lawrence Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 244 S.W.3d 302 (Tenn. 2007).
Lawrence Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Lawrence Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 244 S.W.3d 302 (Tenn. 2007). · cites it 3× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-5-602 (11) (emphasis added).”
Esquinance v. Polk Cnty. Educ. Ass'n, 195 S.W.3d 35 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 13× “Dewey Esquinance is a professional employee within the meaning of Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-5-602 (11) of the Education Professional Negotiations Act (“Negotiations Act”).”
Hamilton Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Hamilton Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 822 F.3d 831 (6th Cir. 2016). “Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 49-5-602(4), (8), (9), -603.”
Royal Surplus Lines Ins. v. Sofamor Danek Grp., Inc., 190 F.R.D. 463 (W.D. Tenn. 1999). · cites it 3× “” § 49-5-602(13) defines "representative” as "any person, or group of persons, organization or association who is designated and authorized by the respective negotiating unit or local board of education to negotiate and act for it under the provisions of this part.”
Carter Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Carter Cnty. Educ. Ass'n, 56 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 3× “There is also another compelling reason the Tennessee Uniform Arbitration Act is not applicable in the case at bar — It is specifically excluded from the Education Professional Negotiations Act, TCA § 49-5-602. The issues are found in favor of the Appellee.”
Marion Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Marion Cnty. Educ. Ass'n, 86 S.W.3d 202 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “§ 49-5-611(a) and § 49-5-602(a)(3). It would also be a non-delegable authority not subject to binding arbitration and in violation of § 49 — 2—203(a)(1) which confers the duty on the local board of education to elect principals, supervisors, etc.”
Wagner v. Haslam, 112 F. Supp. 3d 673 (M.D. Tenn. 2015). “§ 49-5-602(9)). For purposes of the instant motions, the court will assume that the plaintiffs collectively cover the interests of all potential teachers impacted by the laws and policies at issue.”
Cannon Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Goldy Wade & Cannon Cnty. Educ. Ass'n (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 10× “”2 Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-5-602 (1). Since Tennessee statutes on arbitration, including the Tennessee Arbitration Act, are inapplicable to arbitrations authorized under the EPNA, Tenn.”
Clarksville Montgomery Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Clarksville Montgomery Cnty. Bd. of Educ. (2025). · cites it 5× “] Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-5-602 (2). Local boards of education are required to engage in collaborative conferencing with regard to certain “terms and conditions of employment” of professional employees, as specified by Tennessee Code Annotated section 49-5-608(a).”
The Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., Tennessee v. Metro. Nashville Educ. Ass'n (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-5-602 (8).4 In Lawrence County Education Association v.”
Wilson Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Wilson Cnty. Educ. Ass'n & Steve Johnson (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “”9 Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-5-602 (1). That provision continues, however, by stating “Arbitration under this part is not governed by the provisions of title 29, chapter 5.”
Metro. Nashville Educ. Ass'n v. Nashville Bd. of Educ. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “Although § 49-5-602 removed arbitration under the Educational Professional Negotiations Act as codified in part 6 from the provisions of title 29, we cannot agree with Mr.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-5-602(1) — 1 case
Metro. Nashville Educ. Ass'n v. Nashville Bd. of Educ. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). “Although § 49-5-602 removed arbitration under the Educational Professional Negotiations Act as codified in part 6 from the provisions of title 29, we cannot agree with Mr.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-5-602(12) — 1 case
Esquinance v. Polk Cnty. Educ. Ass'n, 195 S.W.3d 35 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “Dewey Esquinance is a professional employee within the meaning of Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-5-602 (11) of the Education Professional Negotiations Act (“Negotiations Act”).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-5-602(13) — 1 case
Royal Surplus Lines Ins. v. Sofamor Danek Grp., Inc., 190 F.R.D. 463 (W.D. Tenn. 1999). “” § 49-5-602(13) defines "representative” as "any person, or group of persons, organization or association who is designated and authorized by the respective negotiating unit or local board of education to negotiate and act for it under the provisions of this part.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-5-602(4) — 2 cases
Hamilton Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Hamilton Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 822 F.3d 831 (6th Cir. 2016). “Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 49-5-602(4), (8), (9), -603.”
Hamilton Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Hamilton Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 112 F. Supp. 3d 716 (E.D. Tenn. 2015).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-5-602(6) — 1 case
Lawrence Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Lawrence Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 244 S.W.3d 302 (Tenn. 2007). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-5-602 (11) (emphasis added).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-5-602(9) — 2 cases
Royal Surplus Lines Ins. v. Sofamor Danek Grp., Inc., 190 F.R.D. 463 (W.D. Tenn. 1999). “” § 49-5-602(13) defines "representative” as "any person, or group of persons, organization or association who is designated and authorized by the respective negotiating unit or local board of education to negotiate and act for it under the provisions of this part.”
Wagner v. Haslam, 112 F. Supp. 3d 673 (M.D. Tenn. 2015). “§ 49-5-602(9)). For purposes of the instant motions, the court will assume that the plaintiffs collectively cover the interests of all potential teachers impacted by the laws and policies at issue.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-5-602(a)(3) — 3 cases
Marion Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Marion Cnty. Educ. Ass'n, 86 S.W.3d 202 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “§ 49-5-611(a) and § 49-5-602(a)(3). It would also be a non-delegable authority not subject to binding arbitration and in violation of § 49 — 2—203(a)(1) which confers the duty on the local board of education to elect principals, supervisors, etc.”
Carter Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Carter Cnty. Educ. Ass'n, 56 S.W.3d 1 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). “There is also another compelling reason the Tennessee Uniform Arbitration Act is not applicable in the case at bar — It is specifically excluded from the Education Professional Negotiations Act, TCA § 49-5-602. The issues are found in favor of the Appellee.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.