Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-2-103 (2026)

Payment of employees in private employments

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 362,Secs.s1, s2 eff. 5/11/2017.

Acts 1917, ch. 28, §§ 1-6; Shan., §§ 3608a77b1-3608a77b8; Code 1932, §§ 6713-6720; modified; Acts 1935, ch. 57, § 1; 1937, ch. 153, § 1; C. Supp. 1950, §§ 6714, 6719; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 50-306 -- 50-313; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113; 1991, ch. 384, § 1; 1993, ch. 219, §§ 1, 3, 4; 1999, ch. 32, § 1; 1999, ch. 118, §§ 1, 2; 1999, ch. 520, § 41; 2001, ch. 128, § 1; 2003, ch. 142, § 1; 2010, ch. 874, § 1; 2012, ch. 760, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1989–2024 · leading case: Yates v. Hertz Corp., 285 F. Supp. 2d 1104 (M.D. Tenn. 2003).
Yates v. Hertz Corp., 285 F. Supp. 2d 1104 (M.D. Tenn. 2003). · cites it 16× “40, Plaintiffs Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment at 17), the plaintiff argues most forcefully that he was discharged for attempting to exercise his statutory right to a thirty-minute rest break under Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-2-103 (d). TenmCode Ann.”
Cummings Inc. v. Dorgan, 320 S.W.3d 316 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 6× “On April 9, 2006, Dorgan filed an answer and a counterclaim against Cummings, alleging breach of contract, tortious interference with business relationship, and violation of Tennessee Code Annotated § 50-2-103(a)(3) for Cummings’ failure to pay for his accrued vacation from 2005.”
Massachusetts v. Morash, 490 U.S. 107 (1989). “Codified Laws §§ 60-11-9 to 60-11-15 (1978); Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-2-103 (1983); Tex. Rev.”
Baltimore Harbor Charters, Ltd. v. Ayd, 780 A.2d 303 (Md. 2001). “(West 2000); Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-2-103 (1999); Tex. Lab.”
Abadeer v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 975 F. Supp. 2d 890 (M.D. Tenn. 2013). “10 and two similar cases, Judge Haynes found that language in the statute expressly rendering it a basis for civil litigation, coupled with the absence of a separate enforcement provision present in other statutory sections, meant that “the legislature intended a remedy for…”
Johnson v. Koch Foods, Inc., 670 F. Supp. 2d 657 (E.D. Tenn. 2009). · cites it 2× “They rely on Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-2-103(h), which provides: Each employee shall have a thirty-minute unpaid rest break or meal period if scheduled to work six (6) hours consecutively, except in workplace environments that by their nature of business provide for ample opportunity…”
Rositano v. Freightwise, LLC (M.D. Tenn. 2021). · cites it 9× “Wage Violations (Count X) FW argues that Rositano’s wage violation claim should be dismissed because there is no private right of action for a violation of Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-2-103.8 (Doc. No. 35 at 8–9).”
Hale v. Woodward (M.D. Tenn. 2024). · cites it 6× “The Complaint Fails to State a Claim Under the Tennessee Wage Regulation Act Defendants also ask this Court to dismiss Hale’s wage violation claims as a matter of law because there is no private right of action for a violation of Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 50-2-103 and 50- 2-104.”
Kim Hardy v. Tournament Players Club at Southwind, Inc. d/b/a \TPC Southwind\"" (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 4× “Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 50-2-103 (j) & 50-2-104.”
Richard Michelhaugh v. Consol. Nuclear Sec., LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 2× “1986); Tenn. Code Ann.§ 50-2-103(a)(4). The Tennessee Supreme Court has held that an employer has no obligation to provide an employee with paid time off “in the absence of its agreement to.”
Pridy v. Duke Energy Corp. (M.D. Tenn. 2020). · cites it 2× “ther the program at issue was a “payroll practice” rather than an ERISA-governed welfare plan raises issues of fact that cannot be resolved in the context of a motion to dismiss, and, alternatively, if the court determines as a matter of law that the program is a payroll…”
Kim Hardy v. Tournament Players Club at Southwind, Inc. d/b/a \TPC Southwind\" - DISSENT" (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “Section 50-2-103 addresses the manner in which employees must be paid and provides for meal breaks; a violation of this section is a Class B misdemeanor, and enforcement is vested in the department of labor and workforce development.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-2-103(a)(3) — 1 case
Cummings Inc. v. Dorgan, 320 S.W.3d 316 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). “On April 9, 2006, Dorgan filed an answer and a counterclaim against Cummings, alleging breach of contract, tortious interference with business relationship, and violation of Tennessee Code Annotated § 50-2-103(a)(3) for Cummings’ failure to pay for his accrued vacation from 2005.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-2-103(a)(4) — 1 case
Richard Michelhaugh v. Consol. Nuclear Sec., LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). “1986); Tenn. Code Ann.§ 50-2-103(a)(4). The Tennessee Supreme Court has held that an employer has no obligation to provide an employee with paid time off “in the absence of its agreement to.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-2-103(d) — 1 case
Yates v. Hertz Corp., 285 F. Supp. 2d 1104 (M.D. Tenn. 2003). “40, Plaintiffs Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment at 17), the plaintiff argues most forcefully that he was discharged for attempting to exercise his statutory right to a thirty-minute rest break under Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-2-103 (d). TenmCode Ann.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-2-103(h) — 2 cases
Yates v. Hertz Corp., 285 F. Supp. 2d 1104 (M.D. Tenn. 2003). “40, Plaintiffs Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment at 17), the plaintiff argues most forcefully that he was discharged for attempting to exercise his statutory right to a thirty-minute rest break under Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-2-103 (d). TenmCode Ann.”
Johnson v. Koch Foods, Inc., 670 F. Supp. 2d 657 (E.D. Tenn. 2009). “They rely on Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-2-103(h), which provides: Each employee shall have a thirty-minute unpaid rest break or meal period if scheduled to work six (6) hours consecutively, except in workplace environments that by their nature of business provide for ample opportunity…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.