Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-103 (2026)

Chapter definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 430,s 1, eff. 5/21/2019.

Acts 1991, ch. 142, § 4; 2012, ch. 540, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1986–2011 · leading case: Neff v. Cherokee Ins. Co., 704 S.W.2d 1 (Tenn. 1986).
Neff v. Cherokee Ins. Co., 704 S.W.2d 1 (Tenn. 1986). · cites it 2× “In part, the trial court based its decision on the relative expertise of direct policyholders, compared to that of other insurance companies, in making insurance purchasing choices.”
Leslie Newman, Comm'r of the Tennessee Dep't of Com. & Ins. v. Smart Data Solutions, LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 19× “The Act authorizes proceedings against the entities specified at Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-102 , including “insurers” as defined at Tenn.”
State, ex rel v. Xantus (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-101 (d). The chapter outlines the procedure for such actions, called “Formal Delinquency Proceedings.”
Tennessee Ex Rel. Sizemore v. Sur. Bank, N.A., 84 F. Supp. 2d 803 (N.D. Tex. 1998). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 56-9-103(14). Therefore, for simplicity, I will refer to the plaintiff either as “the plaintiff” or as "the Receiver.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-103(14) — 2 cases
Leslie Newman, Comm'r of the Tennessee Dep't of Com. & Ins. v. Smart Data Solutions, LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). “The Act authorizes proceedings against the entities specified at Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-102 , including “insurers” as defined at Tenn.”
Tennessee Ex Rel. Sizemore v. Sur. Bank, N.A., 84 F. Supp. 2d 803 (N.D. Tex. 1998). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 56-9-103(14). Therefore, for simplicity, I will refer to the plaintiff either as “the plaintiff” or as "the Receiver.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-103(e) — 1 case
Neff v. Cherokee Ins. Co., 704 S.W.2d 1 (Tenn. 1986). “In part, the trial court based its decision on the relative expertise of direct policyholders, compared to that of other insurance companies, in making insurance purchasing choices.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.