7 U.S.C. § 1
SHORT TITLE.
“This Act may be cited as the ‘Salt Cedar and Russian Olive Control Demonstration Act’.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 537
cases (56 in the last 5 years), 1932–2026 · leading case: Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Curran, 456 U.S. 353 (1982).
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Curran, 456 U.S. 353 (1982). “The Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), 7 U. S. C. § 1 et seq. (1976 ed. and Supp.”
In re Commodity Exch., Inc., 213 F. Supp. 3d 631 (S.D.N.Y. 2016). “; (2) market manipulation in violation of the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”), 7 U.S.C. §§ 1 et seq. and CFTC Rule 180.2; (3) employment of a manipulative or deceptive device and false reporting in violation of the CEA, 7 U.”
In re London Silver Fixing, Ltd., 213 F. Supp. 3d 530 (S.D.N.Y. 2016). “-, (2) manipulation in violation of the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”), 7 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.-, (3) principal-agent liability in violation of the CEA, 7 U.”
Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. McDonnell, 287 F. Supp. 3d 213 (E.D.N.Y 2018). “Title 7 U.S.C. § 1 . Presented are two questions that determine the plaintiff's standing: (1) whether virtual currency may be regulated by the CFTC as a commodity; and (2) whether the amendments to the CEA under the Dodd-Frank Act permit the CFTC to exercise its jurisdiction…”
Sonterra Capital Master Fund Ltd. v. Credit Suisse Grp. AG, 277 F. Supp. 3d 521 (S.D.N.Y. 2017). “, the Commodities Exchange Act (“CEA”), 7 U.S.C. §§ 1 , et seq., and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICÓ”), 18 U.”
Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Schor, 478 U.S. 833 (1986). “The question presented is whether the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA or Act), 7 U. S. C. § 1 et seq., empowers the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC or Commission) to entertain state law counterclaims in reparation *836 proceedings and, if so, whether that grant of…”
Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Co Petro Mktg. Grp., Inc., 502 F. Supp. 806 (C.D. Cal. 1980). “, and its various employees and sales agents, charging violations of the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., as amended by the Futures Trading Act of 1978, Public Law 95 — 405.”
CCT Commc'ns, Inc. v. Zone Telecom, Inc., 172 A.3d 1228 (Conn. 2017). “§ 365 (e) does not extend to run-of-the-mill contracts for the purchase of goods but, instead, only to contracts that are similar to and traded in the same manner as those that are governed by the Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., and regulated by the United States…”
Gamma Traders - I LLC v. Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc., 41 F.4th 71 (2d Cir. 2022). “; and various individuals (collectively, “Gamma”) brought this suit pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”), 7 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., alleging that they were harmed by the defendants’ manipulation of futures markets for four precious metals – gold, silver, platinum, and…”
Choi v. Tower Rsch. Capital LLC, 890 F.3d 60 (2d Cir. 2018). “Plaintiffs allege that Defendants Tower Research Capital LLC ("Tower"), a New York based high-frequency trading firm, and its founder, Mark Gorton, injured them and others by engaging in manipulative "spoofing" transactions on the KRX night market in violation of the Commodity…”
Fan Wang v. Attorney Gen. United States, 898 F.3d 341 (3rd Cir. 2018). “House Consideration, Amendment and Passage of H.”
Delay v. Rosenthal Collins Grp., LLC, 585 F.3d 1003 (6th Cir. 2009). “Todd Delay filed this suit against his former employer, Rosenthal Collins Group, LLC (RCG), seeking indemnification for legal expenses incurred in successfully defending a prior suit brought against him under the Commodities Exchange Act (CEA), 7 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. The district…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.