Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 62-13-101 (2026)

Title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Tennessee Real Estate Broker License Act of 1973."

Acts 1973, ch. 181, § 1; T.C.A., § 62-1301.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases, 1983–2017 · leading case: Ganzevoort v. Russell, 949 S.W.2d 293 (Tenn. 1997).
Ganzevoort v. Russell, 949 S.W.2d 293 (Tenn. 1997). · cites it 4× “Likewise, the provisions of the Real Estate Brokers License Act, Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 62-13-101 to XX-XX-XXX (1990 & Supp.”
Burks v. Elevation Outdoor Advert., LLC, 220 S.W.3d 478 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 6× “In accordance with the provisions of the Tennessee Real Estate Broker License Act of 1973, T.C.A. §§ 62-13-101 et seq., the Court finds that Tennessee law bars Plaintiffs from maintaining an action to collect compensation.”
Bowden Bldg. Corp. v. Tennessee Real Est. Comm'n, 15 S.W.3d 434 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “See Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 62-13-101 et seq. (1997 & Supp.”
Skinner v. Steele, 730 S.W.2d 335 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “) Real Estate Broker License Act, T.C.A. § 62-13-101 et seq.) Time-Share Act, T.”
Dickerson v. Sanders Mfg. Co., 658 S.W.2d 535 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “The Chancellor found that the Tennessee Real Estate Broker Licensing Act of 1973 (Act), T.C.A. § 62-13-101, et seq., denied plaintiff any cause of action to recover a commission.”
Bus. Brokerage Centre v. Dixon, 874 S.W.2d 1 (Tenn. 1994). “§ 62-13-101 et seq., requires that a “business broker” possess a real estate broker’s license to be entitled to recover a commission for the sale of a business when real property is included in the assets of the business; and (2) whether the defendants-eounterelaimants are…”
Hermitage House Square, L.P. v. England, 929 S.W.2d 356 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 4× “The maker’s argument was that the note represented a commission on a sale of real estate, in favor of an individual who was not a real estate broker or agent, in violation of Tenn.Code Ann. § 62-13-101 et seq. The payee admitted that he was not a broker or agent, but denied that…”
Westgate Smoky Mountains at Gatlinburg v. Burns Phillips, Comm'r, Tennessee Dep't of Labor & Workforce Dev., 426 S.W.3d 743 (Tenn. 2013). · cites it 2× “Acts 524 (codified as amended at Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 62-13-101 to -604 (2009 & Supp.”
Reid R. Crumpton v. Patricia G. Grissom (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 8× “We find and hold that Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 62-13-101 , et seq. creates a duty on the part of the Managing Broker, and that the Managing Broker failed to show that she met the standard of care sufficient to satisfy her duty.”
Marshall Burks v. Elevation Outdoor Advert., LLC f/k/a Delta Outdoor Advert., LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 6× “In accordance with the provisions of the Tennessee Real Estate Broker License Act of 1973, T.C.A. §§ 62-13-101 et seq., the Court finds that Tennessee law bars Plaintiffs from maintaining an action to collect compensation.”
James R. Haynes, III v. Leslie E. Lunsford (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “and the Tennessee Real Estate Broker License Act, section 62-13-101 et seq. 3. Whether the trial court erred in finding Hirschfield -5- knew or should have known of facts concerning the age and history of the cabin.”
TN. Real Est. Comm. v. Hamilton (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 5× “Are the defendants, whose business is managing, renting, and collecting rents for vacation chalets and cabins for a fee on behalf of private owners, required to be licensed under the Tennessee Real Estate Broker License Act, Tenn. Code Ann. § 62-13-101 et seq.? Tenn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.