Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-1-150 (2026)

Patient safety and quality improvement

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 150, s 1, eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 593, s 1, eff. 3/22/2018.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 4, s 1, eff. 3/15/2017.

Amended by 2014 Tenn. Acts, ch. 651, Secs.s 1, s 2, s 3 eff. 4/8/2014.

Acts 2011 , ch. 67, § 4.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2020–2025 · leading case: Jeffrey Clay Davis v. Vanderbilt Univ. Med. Ctr. (2020).
Jeffrey Clay Davis v. Vanderbilt Univ. Med. Ctr. (2020). · cites it 2× “Davis filed a motion to amend his complaint to add allegations that the “illegal activities” referenced in his complaint included violations of the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005 (“PSQIA”), Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 63-1-150 and 68-11-272, as well as assault and…”
McCleary v. QCHC of Tennessee, PLLC (E.D. Tenn. 2025). · cites it 2× “The Court acknowledges that Tennessee recognizes the medical peer review privilege, see Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 63-1-150 & 68-11-272, which “would weigh in favor of the privilege.”
Travis Kanipe v. Pragnesh Patel MD (2020). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-1-150 (d)(2). Assuming the defendant testifies regarding the standard of care, and his compliance therewith, the jury is entitled to consider all relevant information regarding his qualifications and the introduction of the disputed evidence will not be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.