Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-6-101 (2026)

Creation - Composition - Administrative support - Consultants

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)
- (1) There shall be a board to be known as the board of medical examiners, referred to in this chapter as the "board," to consist of twelve (12) members. Nine (9) members shall be duly licensed physicians, each of whom must meet the following qualifications:
  - (A) Graduation from a medical school whose curriculum is substantially similar to, and whose educational standards are as high as that of, the medical department of the University of Tennessee, as published at the time of its extant catalogue; and
  - (B) Not less than six (6) years experience in the practice of either medicine or surgery or both.
- (2) Three (3) members shall be nonphysicians who are consumers of health care and who neither own nor have any financial or other interest in any health care facility or business or school of medicine or other allied health care practitioner educational program and who shall represent the public at large.
- (3) It shall be the board's duty to examine the qualifications of all applicants for certification of fitness to practice medicine or surgery in this state, to conduct disciplinary hearings, and to make such rules and regulations as are necessary to carry out and make effective this chapter. Any rules and regulations promulgated by the board shall comply with all requirements of the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, compiled in title 4, chapter 5. No member shall be employed by or be a member of the governing body of, or have a financial interest in, any medical school, college or university of the state or of any school, college or university in which allied health care practitioners who are under the regulation of the board receive their qualifying education.
- (4) [Deleted by 2024 amendment.]

(b) The board shall receive administrative support from the division of health related boards in the department of health, referred to as the "division" in this chapter.

(c)
- (1) The division shall consult the board in the hiring of a medical consultant. A licensed physician, hired by the division in consultation with the board as described in this subdivision (c)(1), and designated and authorized by the board, is vested with authority as a consultant to the board to do the following:
  - (A) Review and make recommendations to the board on licensure, certification, exemption, renewal, reinstatement, and reactivation applications subject to the rules governing those respective applications;
  - (B) In consultation with the office of general counsel, determine what, if any, investigation should be instituted upon complaints received by the division;
  - (C) In consultation with the office of general counsel and in accordance with board guidelines, decide whether a licensee who is the subject of a complaint or an investigation is an appropriate candidate for diversion to a professional peer review organization or impaired professional association;
  - (D) In consultation with the office of general counsel, determine what, if any, complaints or investigations should be referred to the office of general counsel to pursue formal disciplinary action;
  - (E) In consultation with the office of general counsel, determine what, if any, terms of proposed settlement may be offered in any matter referred to the office of general counsel to pursue formal disciplinary action. However, a proposed settlement is not binding upon any party unless and until it is accepted by a majority vote of the entire board or a duly constituted panel of the board; and
  - (F) In consultation with the office of general counsel, determine the terms upon which the division can agree to tentatively settle pending disciplinary actions. However, a tentative settlement is not binding upon a party unless and until it is accepted by a majority of the entire board or a duly constituted panel of the board.
- (2) The board may withdraw its designation and authorization for a consultant to perform all or part of the acts listed in subdivision (c)(1).
- (3) The department shall provide biannual surveys to the board for its feedback and review of the consultant described in this subsection (c).
- (4) The board may promulgate rules regarding how it will review the work of consultants described in this subsection (c).

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 944,s 5, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 252, s 1, eff. 4/28/2023.

Acts 1901, ch. 78, § 2; Shan., § 3096a14; Code 1932, § 6919; Acts 1945, ch. 181, § 1; impl. am. Acts 1947, ch. 9, §§ 2-4, 9; mod. C. Supp. 1950, § 6919; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 63-601; Acts 1982, ch. 905, § 1; 1984, ch. 937, § 26; 1993, ch. 404, § 1; 1996, ch. 1043, § 1.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 19 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1988–2021 · leading case: Lee Med., Inc. v. Paula Beecher, 312 S.W.3d 515 (Tenn. 2010).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Lee Med., Inc. v. Paula Beecher, 312 S.W.3d 515 (Tenn. 2010). · cites it 4× “Had that been the General Assembly’s intent, it would not have enacted separate peer review immunity provisions and privileges for other professional groups.”

Joseph Edward Rich, M.D. v. Tennessee Bd. of Med. Examiners, 350 S.W.3d 919 (Tenn. 2011). · cites it 8× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-6-101 (a)(3). Upon establishment of specified grounds, Tennessee Code Annotated section 63-6-214(a) authorizes the Board to (1) Deny an application for a license to any applicant who applies for the same through reciprocity or otherwise; (2) Permanently or…”

Murfreesboro Med. Clinic, P.A. v. Udom, 166 S.W.3d 674 (Tenn. 2005). · cites it 4× “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 63-6-101 (1997) (providing for the creation and composition of the Board); see also State v.”

Bobby Watts, M.D. v. John H. Burkhart, M.D., 854 F.2d 839 (6th Cir. 1988). “The Tennessee courts have long upheld the constitutionality of the regulation of medicine, and have repeatedly upheld the constitutionality of the statutes which regulate medicine and physicians.”

Bobby Watts, M.D. v. John H. Burkhart, M.D., Howard R. Foreman, M.D., Alvin J. Ingram, M.D., I. Lee Arnold, M.D., & Duane C. Budd, M.D., 978 F.2d 269 (6th Cir. 1992). “Under Tenn.Code Ann. § 63-6-101, every one of the five members of the board must be a duly licensed physician with at least six years of experience in the practice of medicine and/or surgery.”

McNiel v. Cooper, 241 S.W.3d 886 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “McNiel $20,916 in legal fees. We remand the case to the trial court with directions to dismiss Dr.”

Andres Perez v. Tennessee Bd. of Med. Examiners (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 9× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-6-101 (“Any rules and regulations promulgated by the board shall comply with all requirements of the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act[.”

Ingram v. Tennessee Dep't of Health (M.D. Tenn. 2021). · cites it 6× “]” Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-6-101 (a)(3) (2021).”

Adedamola O. Oni, M.D. v. Tennessee Dep't of Health & Tennessee Bd. of Med. Examiners (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 4× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-6-101 (a)(3). 2 See Tenn.”

Tennessee Dep't of Health & the Div. of Health Related Boards v. Kandala Chary (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 4× “Following a contested case hearing in which all material facts were stipulated, the Board of Medical Examiners dismissed all charges upon the finding that “the Department had not proven facts sufficient to establish that Respondent[s] violated Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 63-6-101 et…”

Frank H. McNiel v. Susan R. Cooper (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 4× “Frank McNiel with written requests for records of thirty of his patients. Dr. McNiel is a family practitioner in Knoxville who specializes in pain management.”

Joseph Edward Rich, M.D. v. Tennessee Bd. of Med. Examiners - Dissenting (Tenn. 2011). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-6-101 (a)(2) (2010) (providing for three non-physician members of the Board).”

Show all 19 citing cases →

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-6-101(a)(1) — 1 case

Joseph Edward Rich, M.D. v. Tennessee Bd. of Med. Examiners, 350 S.W.3d 919 (Tenn. 2011). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-6-101 (a)(3). Upon establishment of specified grounds, Tennessee Code Annotated section 63-6-214(a) authorizes the Board to (1) Deny an application for a license to any applicant who applies for the same through reciprocity or otherwise; (2) Permanently or…”

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-6-101(a)(2) — 1 case

— Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-6-101(a)(3) — 2 cases

Andres Perez v. Tennessee Bd. of Med. Examiners (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-6-101 (“Any rules and regulations promulgated by the board shall comply with all requirements of the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act[.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.