Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-8-102 (2026)

Chapter definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this chapter unless the context otherwise requires:

Amended by 2014 Tenn. Acts, ch. 638, s 1, eff. 4/8/2014.

Acts 1925, ch. 99, § 2; Shan. Supp., § 3654a10; Code 1932, §7027; Acts 1935, ch. 129, § 1; 1939, ch. 90, §§1, 2; impl. am. Acts 1947, ch. 9, §§ 2-4, 9; C. Supp. 1950, § 7027; Acts 1953, ch. 113, § 37; 1975, ch. 116, § 1; modified; Acts 1977, ch. 490, §2; 1979, ch. 406, §§ 1-8; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 63-802; Acts 1984, ch. 937, § 34; 1987, ch. 217, § 1; 1993, ch. 295, §1; 2003 , ch. 167, § 1; 2005, ch. 4, §§ 1, 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1991–2003 · leading case: LensCrafters, Inc. v. Sundquist, 33 S.W.3d 772 (Tenn. 2000).
LensCrafters, Inc. v. Sundquist, 33 S.W.3d 772 (Tenn. 2000). · cites it 6× “Although this argument was not raised by the parties, one might assert that optometrists are allowed to sell lenses and frames within their own practice, Tenn.Code Ann. § 63-8-102(12), and yet by doing so, they violate the prohibition against practicing in a “retail store .”
State v. Sowder, 826 S.W.2d 924 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1991). · cites it 6× “T.C.A. § 63-8-102(12), quoted elsewhere herein, defines the “(p)ractice of optometry as a profession.”
Lenscrafters, Inc. v. Wadley, 248 F. Supp. 2d 705 (M.D. Tenn. 2003). · cites it 2× “§ 63-8-102(12), and yet by doing so, they violate the prohibition against practicing in a “retail store .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-8-102(12) — 3 cases
State v. Sowder, 826 S.W.2d 924 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1991). “T.C.A. § 63-8-102(12), quoted elsewhere herein, defines the “(p)ractice of optometry as a profession.”
LensCrafters, Inc. v. Sundquist, 33 S.W.3d 772 (Tenn. 2000). “Although this argument was not raised by the parties, one might assert that optometrists are allowed to sell lenses and frames within their own practice, Tenn.Code Ann. § 63-8-102(12), and yet by doing so, they violate the prohibition against practicing in a “retail store .”
Lenscrafters, Inc. v. Wadley, 248 F. Supp. 2d 705 (M.D. Tenn. 2003). “§ 63-8-102(12), and yet by doing so, they violate the prohibition against practicing in a “retail store .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-8-102(12)(A)(B) — 1 case
LensCrafters, Inc. v. Sundquist, 33 S.W.3d 772 (Tenn. 2000). “Although this argument was not raised by the parties, one might assert that optometrists are allowed to sell lenses and frames within their own practice, Tenn.Code Ann. § 63-8-102(12), and yet by doing so, they violate the prohibition against practicing in a “retail store .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-8-102(12)(D) — 2 cases
LensCrafters, Inc. v. Sundquist, 33 S.W.3d 772 (Tenn. 2000). “Although this argument was not raised by the parties, one might assert that optometrists are allowed to sell lenses and frames within their own practice, Tenn.Code Ann. § 63-8-102(12), and yet by doing so, they violate the prohibition against practicing in a “retail store .”
Lenscrafters, Inc. v. Wadley, 248 F. Supp. 2d 705 (M.D. Tenn. 2003). “§ 63-8-102(12), and yet by doing so, they violate the prohibition against practicing in a “retail store .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 63-8-102(2) — 1 case
State v. Sowder, 826 S.W.2d 924 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1991). “T.C.A. § 63-8-102(12), quoted elsewhere herein, defines the “(p)ractice of optometry as a profession.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.