Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-22-108 (2026)

Acknowledgment for record of corporate or partnership instrument

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1899, ch. 187, § 1; Shan., § 3747a1; Acts 1919, ch. 48, § 1; Shan. Supp., § 3747a2; Code 1932, § 7663; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 64-2208; Acts 1982, ch. 800, §§ 1, 2; 1983, ch. 158, §§ 4-8.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1983–2002 · leading case: David Leonard Assocs., P.C. v. Airport-81 Nursing Care, Inc. (In Re Airport-81 Nursing Care, Inc.), 29 B.R. 501 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1983).
David Leonard Assocs., P.C. v. Airport-81 Nursing Care, Inc. (In Re Airport-81 Nursing Care, Inc.), 29 B.R. 501 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1983). · cites it 16× “The Bank denies the acknowledgments are defective, insisting that they substantially comply with the statutory requirements of Tenn.Code Ann. § 66-22-108 (Supp.1982). The Bank also maintains it holds a valid deed of trust against a 0.”
In Re Hutchens, 69 B.R. 402 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1987). · cites it 8× “(In all cases add signature and title of officer taking the acknowledgment.”
REM Enter., Ltd. v. Frye, 937 S.W.2d 920 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “T.C.A. § 66-22-108 sets forth the form used for authentication of a deed.”
In Re Akins, 87 S.W.3d 488 (Tenn. 2002). “Section 66-22-107 includes the following: a) If the acknowledgment is made before a county clerk or deputy, or clerk and master, or notary public, or before any of the officers out of the state who are commissioned or accredited to act at the place where the acknowledgment is…”
Don Huckaby Plumbing Co. v. Cardinal Indus. Mortg. Co., 848 S.W.2d 57 (Tenn. 1993). · cites it 2× “§ 66-22-101 provides that "[t]o authenticate an instrument for registration, its execution shall be acknowledged by the maker_” T.C.A. § 66-22-108 provides a form to be used for this purpose when the maker is a corporation or partnership.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-22-108(a) — 2 cases
David Leonard Assocs., P.C. v. Airport-81 Nursing Care, Inc. (In Re Airport-81 Nursing Care, Inc.), 29 B.R. 501 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1983). “The Bank denies the acknowledgments are defective, insisting that they substantially comply with the statutory requirements of Tenn.Code Ann. § 66-22-108 (Supp.1982). The Bank also maintains it holds a valid deed of trust against a 0.”
In Re Hutchens, 69 B.R. 402 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1987). “(In all cases add signature and title of officer taking the acknowledgment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.