Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-3-307 (2026)

When transfer is made or obligation is incurred

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

For the purposes of this part:

Acts 2003, ch. 42, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1987–2017 · leading case: Guinn v. Lines (In Re Trans-Lines West, Inc.), 203 B.R. 653 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1996).
Guinn v. Lines (In Re Trans-Lines West, Inc.), 203 B.R. 653 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1996). · cites it 6× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 66-3-307 (1993). Conveyances with intent to defraud.”
Paris v. Walker (In re Walker), 566 B.R. 503 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2017). · cites it 2× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-3-307 (1)(A). Here, the applicable dates of transfer would be the dates the deeds were recorded.”
In Re Turner, 78 B.R. 166 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1987). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-3-307 . Since the trustee is a subsequent creditor, he may not be in the class of creditors protected by the first and second constructive fraud statutes.”
Crocker v. Ryan, 914 S.W.2d 551 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “These sections apply to future creditors, but Tenn.Code Ann. § 66-3-307 requires that the transferor have an intent or belief that future debts will exceed the transferor’s ability to pay and Tenn.”
Beverly Healthcare Brandywood v. Betty L. Gammon (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 8× “In order to be fraudulent under Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-3-307 (Supp. 1999) (repealed 2003), the transferor must have a belief that future debts will exceed the transferor’s ability to pay.”
Guy G. Bigger, Jr. v. Anthony I. Fields, Guy M. Fields, Patrick E. Smith (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “4 Tennessee Code Annotated section 66-3-307 provided a conveyance made without fair consideration when the grantor believed that debts would accrue beyond his or her ability to pay as they mature was fraudulent as to both present and future creditors.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.