Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-2-101 (2026)

Chapter definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:

Acts 1931 (2nd Ex. Sess.), ch. 20, § 3; 1933, ch. 60, § 1; 1949, ch. 185, § 3; C. Supp. 1950, § 1123.3; Acts 1959, ch. 290, § 1; 1963, ch. 271, § 2; 1967, ch. 176, §1; 1982, ch. 652, § 1; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), §§ 67-2601, 67-2624; Acts 1985, ch. 58, § 1; 1985, ch. 364, § 1; 1989, ch. 186, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1984–2011 · leading case: Steele v. Indus. Dev. Bd. of the Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 950 S.W.2d 345 (Tenn. 1997).
Steele v. Indus. Dev. Bd. of the Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 950 S.W.2d 345 (Tenn. 1997). · cites it 18× “§ 67-2-101(l)(B)(i), such that the interest on the bonds is exempt from the Tennessee “Hall Income Tax” under Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-2-101 et seq. The decision is that interest on the bonds is subject to the State income tax.”
Dominion Nat'l Bank v. Martha B. Olsen, 771 F.2d 108 (6th Cir. 1985). “Now codified as Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-2-101(l)(B)(ii), the amendment provides that the term “bond” shall not include certificates of deposit issued by financial institutions chartered either by the State of Tennessee or by the United States and lawfully doing business under…”
Shackleford v. Olsen, 675 S.W.2d 171 (Tenn. 1984). · cites it 8× “Appellees brought this action to recover from the appellant Commissioner certain taxes paid under protest pursuant to the Hall Income Tax Law, T.C.A. §§ 67-2-101 to 121. 1 The amount in controversy is $459.”
Steele v. Indus. Dev. Bd., 950 S.W.2d 345 (Tenn. 1997). · cites it 20× “ed the following question of law certified by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee: Whether bonds which contain a "liquidity demand" provision, giving bondholders the right to collect the face value of the bonds upon giving seven (7) days notice,…”
Dobson v. Huddleston, 863 S.W.2d 392 (Tenn. 1993). “The dividends were thus taxable under Tennessee Code Annotated § 67-2-101, et seq, regardless of the source of immediate funding for such dividends and whether dividends funded in such a manner are expected to recur.”
W. Turner Boone v. Loren L. Chumley, Comm'r of The Tennessee Dep't of Revenue, 372 S.W.3d 104 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “Tennessee’s limited income tax — the Hall Income Tax — is codified at Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 67-2-101 et seq. (2011).”
Indmar Prods. Co v. CIR (6th Cir. 2006). “Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 67-2-101 (1)(B)(i), 67-2-102 (2005).”
Comm'r, 2005 T.C. Memo. 32 (1970). · cites it 2× “From 1987 to 2000, the Rowes' transfers were not repaid in full. Tennessee residents, pursuant to Tenn.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-2-101(1) — 1 case
Steele v. Indus. Dev. Bd. of the Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 950 S.W.2d 345 (Tenn. 1997). “§ 67-2-101(l)(B)(i), such that the interest on the bonds is exempt from the Tennessee “Hall Income Tax” under Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-2-101 et seq. The decision is that interest on the bonds is subject to the State income tax.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-2-101(l)(A) — 1 case
Shackleford v. Olsen, 675 S.W.2d 171 (Tenn. 1984). “Appellees brought this action to recover from the appellant Commissioner certain taxes paid under protest pursuant to the Hall Income Tax Law, T.C.A. §§ 67-2-101 to 121. 1 The amount in controversy is $459.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-2-101(l)(B)(i) — 2 cases
Steele v. Indus. Dev. Bd. of the Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty., 950 S.W.2d 345 (Tenn. 1997). “§ 67-2-101(l)(B)(i), such that the interest on the bonds is exempt from the Tennessee “Hall Income Tax” under Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-2-101 et seq. The decision is that interest on the bonds is subject to the State income tax.”
Shackleford v. Olsen, 675 S.W.2d 171 (Tenn. 1984). “Appellees brought this action to recover from the appellant Commissioner certain taxes paid under protest pursuant to the Hall Income Tax Law, T.C.A. §§ 67-2-101 to 121. 1 The amount in controversy is $459.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-2-101(l)(B)(ii) — 2 cases
Dominion Nat'l Bank v. Martha B. Olsen, 771 F.2d 108 (6th Cir. 1985). “Now codified as Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-2-101(l)(B)(ii), the amendment provides that the term “bond” shall not include certificates of deposit issued by financial institutions chartered either by the State of Tennessee or by the United States and lawfully doing business under…”
Shackleford v. Olsen, 675 S.W.2d 171 (Tenn. 1984). “Appellees brought this action to recover from the appellant Commissioner certain taxes paid under protest pursuant to the Hall Income Tax Law, T.C.A. §§ 67-2-101 to 121. 1 The amount in controversy is $459.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.