Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2012 (2026)

Apportionment formula

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 377, s 21, eff. 5/11/2023.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 377, s 20, eff. 5/11/2023.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 377, s 19, eff. 5/11/2023.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 656, s 1, eff. 4/9/2018.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 181, s 28, eff. 4/26/2017.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 514, s 9, eff. 7/1/2016.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 514, Secs.s 8, s 8 eff. 5/20/2015.

Acts 1999, ch. 406, § 3; 2000, ch. 982, §§ 20 - 22, 48; 2006, ch. 1019, § 19; 2011 , ch. 467, § 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 2009–2019 · leading case: Bellsouth Advert. & Publ'g Corp. v. Chumley, 308 S.W.3d 350 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009).
Bellsouth Advert. & Publ'g Corp. v. Chumley, 308 S.W.3d 350 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 53× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-4-2012 6 defines the standard apportionment ratio as a fraction, the numerator of which is the sum of the property, payroll and sales factors of each taxpayer as defined in the statute and the denominator is four (4).”
Vodafone Americas Holdings, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Richard H. Roberts, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee, 486 S.W.3d 496 (Tenn. 2016). · cites it 17× “24 21 In the legislative discussion on the UDITPA legislation, Representative John Bragg reported that the Tennessee franchise and excise tax formula in existence at that time was different from that used by any other Multistate Tax Compact state, that some form of UDITPA was…”
Tgs-nopec Geophysical Co. v. Combs, 340 S.W.3d 432 (Tex. 2011). “05(B)(2)(c)(ii) (West 2011) ("Receipts from the sale, exchange, disposition, or other grant of the right to use trademarks, trade names, patents, copyrights, and similar intellectual property shall be sitused to this state to the extent that the receipts are based on the amount…”
Blue Bell Creameries, LP v. Roberts, 333 S.W.3d 59 (Tenn. 2011). · cites it 2× “2000) provides the manner in which a taxpayer allocates its earnings, and Tennessee Code Annotated section 67-4-2012 (Supp.2000) provides the formula by which a taxpayer apportions its net earnings to determine its excise tax.”
Bellsouth Advert. & Publ'g Corp. v. Loren L. Chumley, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 48× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2012 (a). The statute defines each factor as a fraction in which the numerator is the taxpayer's respective property, payroll or sales values in Tennessee and the denominator is the taxpayer's respective property, payroll or sales values in all…”
Vodafone Americas Holdings Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Richard H. Roberts, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 34× “3-00947-COA-R3-CV - Filed June 23, 2014 At issue in this case is the methodology by which multi-state taxpayers are to compute their liability for franchise and excise taxes to Tennessee and, specifically, the authority of the Commissioner of Revenue to require the taxpayers to…”
Comcast Holdings Corp. v. Tennessee Dep't of Revenue (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2012 (2008).3 They likewise agree that the Franchise Tax apportionment formula applicable is as follows: (a)(1) Except as otherwise provided in this part, for tax years beginning prior to July 1, 2016, the net worth of a taxpayer doing business both in and…”
H.J. Heinz Co., L.P. v. Loren L. Chumley, Commissioiner of Revenue, State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). “Tennessee Code Annotated § 67-4-2012. Heinz LP asserts that Tennessee’s apportionment formula is unfair because it lacks “factor representation.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2012(a) — 2 cases
Vodafone Americas Holdings, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Richard H. Roberts, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee, 486 S.W.3d 496 (Tenn. 2016). “24 21 In the legislative discussion on the UDITPA legislation, Representative John Bragg reported that the Tennessee franchise and excise tax formula in existence at that time was different from that used by any other Multistate Tax Compact state, that some form of UDITPA was…”
Bellsouth Advert. & Publ'g Corp. v. Chumley, 308 S.W.3d 350 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-4-2012 6 defines the standard apportionment ratio as a fraction, the numerator of which is the sum of the property, payroll and sales factors of each taxpayer as defined in the statute and the denominator is four (4).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2012(b) — 1 case
Bellsouth Advert. & Publ'g Corp. v. Chumley, 308 S.W.3d 350 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-4-2012 6 defines the standard apportionment ratio as a fraction, the numerator of which is the sum of the property, payroll and sales factors of each taxpayer as defined in the statute and the denominator is four (4).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2012(f)(2) — 1 case
Bellsouth Advert. & Publ'g Corp. v. Chumley, 308 S.W.3d 350 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-4-2012 6 defines the standard apportionment ratio as a fraction, the numerator of which is the sum of the property, payroll and sales factors of each taxpayer as defined in the statute and the denominator is four (4).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2012(h) — 1 case
Bellsouth Advert. & Publ'g Corp. v. Chumley, 308 S.W.3d 350 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-4-2012 6 defines the standard apportionment ratio as a fraction, the numerator of which is the sum of the property, payroll and sales factors of each taxpayer as defined in the statute and the denominator is four (4).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2012(i) — 3 cases
Bellsouth Advert. & Publ'g Corp. v. Chumley, 308 S.W.3d 350 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-4-2012 6 defines the standard apportionment ratio as a fraction, the numerator of which is the sum of the property, payroll and sales factors of each taxpayer as defined in the statute and the denominator is four (4).”
Vodafone Americas Holdings, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Richard H. Roberts, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee, 486 S.W.3d 496 (Tenn. 2016). “24 21 In the legislative discussion on the UDITPA legislation, Representative John Bragg reported that the Tennessee franchise and excise tax formula in existence at that time was different from that used by any other Multistate Tax Compact state, that some form of UDITPA was…”
Bellsouth Advert. & Publ'g Corp. v. Loren L. Chumley, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2012 (a). The statute defines each factor as a fraction in which the numerator is the taxpayer's respective property, payroll or sales values in Tennessee and the denominator is the taxpayer's respective property, payroll or sales values in all…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2012(i)(2) — 3 cases
Vodafone Americas Holdings, Inc. & Subsidiaries v. Richard H. Roberts, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee, 486 S.W.3d 496 (Tenn. 2016). “24 21 In the legislative discussion on the UDITPA legislation, Representative John Bragg reported that the Tennessee franchise and excise tax formula in existence at that time was different from that used by any other Multistate Tax Compact state, that some form of UDITPA was…”
Bellsouth Advert. & Publ'g Corp. v. Chumley, 308 S.W.3d 350 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-4-2012 6 defines the standard apportionment ratio as a fraction, the numerator of which is the sum of the property, payroll and sales factors of each taxpayer as defined in the statute and the denominator is four (4).”
Bellsouth Advert. & Publ'g Corp. v. Loren L. Chumley, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2012 (a). The statute defines each factor as a fraction in which the numerator is the taxpayer's respective property, payroll or sales values in Tennessee and the denominator is the taxpayer's respective property, payroll or sales values in all…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2012(i)(l) — 1 case
Bellsouth Advert. & Publ'g Corp. v. Chumley, 308 S.W.3d 350 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2009). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-4-2012 6 defines the standard apportionment ratio as a fraction, the numerator of which is the sum of the property, payroll and sales factors of each taxpayer as defined in the statute and the denominator is four (4).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2012(j) — 1 case
Tgs-nopec Geophysical Co. v. Combs, 340 S.W.3d 432 (Tex. 2011). “05(B)(2)(c)(ii) (West 2011) ("Receipts from the sale, exchange, disposition, or other grant of the right to use trademarks, trade names, patents, copyrights, and similar intellectual property shall be sitused to this state to the extent that the receipts are based on the amount…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.