Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-409 (2026)

Recordation tax

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 834, Secs.s 1, s 2 eff. 4/19/2022.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 197, s 7, eff. 4/25/2019.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1027, s 4, eff. 7/1/2016.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1059, s 3, eff. 4/28/2016.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 425, Secs.s 3, s 5 eff. 5/15/2015.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 236, s 76, eff. 4/19/2013.

Code 1858, § 673 (deriv. Acts 1805, ch. 61, § 2); Shan., § 968; Code 1932, § 1677; Acts 1937, ch. 108, art. 2, § 1; Item 96; 1937, ch. 192, § 13; 1937 (2nd Ex. Sess.), ch. 11, § 1; 1947, ch. 212, § 19; mod. C. Supp. 1950, § 1248.3, Item S (Williams, § 1248.108); Acts 1957, ch. 22, § 8; 1967, ch. 178, § 1; 1968, ch. 483, §§ 1-3; 1971, ch. 190, §§ 1, 2; 1971, ch. 430, § 1; 1974, ch. 632, §§ 1, 2; 1976, ch. 492, § 1; 1977, ch. 148, § 1; 1977, ch. 323, § 1; 1978, ch. 908, § 1; impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 934, §§ 22, 36; Acts 1981, ch. 149, § 1; 1982, ch. 817, §§ 1-3; 1983, ch. 149, § 1; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 67-4102, Item S; Acts 1986, ch. 598, § 2; 1986, ch. 604, § 1; 1986, ch. 833, §§ 6, 7; 1987, ch. 275, §§ 1-4; 1988, ch. 900, § 13; 1989, ch. 112, § 1; 1989, ch. 461, §§ 2-4; 1989, ch. 474, § 1; 1991, ch. 211, §§ 3, 4; 1991, ch. 256, §§ 2-9; 1993, ch. 410, § 19; 1994, ch. 721, § 1; 1995, ch. 100, § 1; 1997 , ch. 526, § 1; 1997 , ch. 542, § 4; 1998, ch. 604, § 1; 1998, ch. 605, §§ 4 - 8; 1998, ch. 673, §§ 1 - 5; 2000, ch. 846, § 31; 2000, ch. 907, § 1; 2000, ch. 943, § 1; 2000, ch. 983, § 5; 2000, ch. 998, § 1; 2002, ch. 678, § 1; 2003 , ch. 355, §§ 33-36; 2003 , ch. 386, § 1; 2005, ch. 99, § 13; 2006, ch. 673, § 1; 2006, ch. 989, § 3; 2007 , ch. 79, § 1; 2007 , ch. 153, § 2; 2007 , ch. 180, § 1; 2007 , ch. 602, §§ 183-186; 2008 , ch. 1106, §§ 64-67; 2010 , ch. 1134, §§ 49, 60, 62, 63; 2011 , ch. 321, § 1; 2012 , ch. 604, §§ 17, 18; 2012 , ch. 792, §§ 1, 2; 2012 , ch. 993, § 7.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases, 1984–2012 · leading case: Webb Mtn, LLC v. Exec. Realty P'ship (In Re Webb Mtn, LLC), 414 B.R. 308 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2009).
Webb Mtn, LLC v. Exec. Realty P'ship (In Re Webb Mtn, LLC), 414 B.R. 308 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2009). · cites it 11× “The purpose of § 67-4-409 is “to generate state revenue, not supplant the priority rules found in .”
Health & Educ. Families Bd. v. King, 678 S.W.2d 14 (Tenn. 1984). · cites it 14× “” T.C.A. § 67-4-409(b). All of the facts before the Court are by stipulation.”
Stinson v. Brand, 738 S.W.2d 186 (Tenn. 1987). · cites it 2× “T.C.A. § 67-4-409. 2 . Mr. Gibson testified that his firm’s financial records were lax.”
In Re Williams, 247 B.R. 449 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2000). · cites it 4× “The Debtor argues that the Successor Trustee Deed did not comply with Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-409 (a)(6)(A), which sets forth a tax payable for the privilege of recording deeds for the transfer of property.”
State ex rel. Dep't of Transp. v. Harvey, 680 S.W.2d 792 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “T.C.A. § 67-4-409(c) provides: “Any oath required in subsection (a) and (b) [as to value of, or consideration paid for, real property] of this section shall not be introduced in any proceeding had in connection with any condemnation action for the purpose of indicating the value…”
In Re Ramey, 93 B.R. 136 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1988). · cites it 4× “Secondly, and conclusively, the 1987 amendments to Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-4-409 (Supp.1988), formerly Tenn.”
Webb Mtn, LLC v. Exec. Realty P'ship, L.P. (In Re Webb Mtn, LLC), 420 B.R. 418 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2009). “Accordingly, when the General Warranty Deeds were recorded on March 28, 2006, each contained the following certification: "I hereby swear or affirm that the actual consideration or value of the transfer, whichever is greater, is_" The value assigned the respective tracts were as…”
Kile v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 641 F. Supp. 723 (E.D. Tenn. 1986). · cites it 2× “Finally, the FDIC argued that the Kiles’ mortgage could not be given priority over the mortgage held by the FDIC because the Kiles had not paid the privilege tax required under T.C.A. § 67-4-409(b) at the time the Bank’s deed of trust' was recorded and its privilege tax paid.”
Bank of Am. v. Greene, 465 B.R. 789 (E.D. Tenn. 2012). · cites it 4× “However, that same day, the Register improperly voided the DOT, 2 see Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-4-409(b)(10)(A), and improperly replaced it with a subsequent, unrelated instrument at the identical book and page numbers [Id.”
Stewart v. Farmers Bank (In re Johnson), 39 B.R. 358 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1984). · cites it 2× “T.C.A. § 67-4-409(b) requires that a recordation tax be paid before a deed of trust may be recorded to perfect a security interest in real property: (b) MORTGAGES, DEEDS OF TRUST AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS.”
In Re Vill. Imp. Enter., Inc., 126 B.R. 307 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1991). “§ 67-4-409 (b)(10) (Michie 1989). Section 9-403(1) of the UCC was amended to agree with this statute.”
Cox v. Union Cnty. Bank (In Re Cox), 57 B.R. 290 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1986). · cites it 2× “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-4-409(b) (1983). 4 . Debtor also disputes the Bank’s calculations of her indebtedness represented by two other claims based on the notes dated November 8, 1977, and June 18, 1983.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-409(a) — 1 case
Webb Mtn, LLC v. Exec. Realty P'ship (In Re Webb Mtn, LLC), 414 B.R. 308 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2009). “The purpose of § 67-4-409 is “to generate state revenue, not supplant the priority rules found in .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-409(a)(4) — 1 case
Webb Mtn, LLC v. Exec. Realty P'ship (In Re Webb Mtn, LLC), 414 B.R. 308 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2009). “The purpose of § 67-4-409 is “to generate state revenue, not supplant the priority rules found in .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-409(a)(6)(A) — 3 cases
Webb Mtn, LLC v. Exec. Realty P'ship, L.P. (In Re Webb Mtn, LLC), 420 B.R. 418 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2009). “Accordingly, when the General Warranty Deeds were recorded on March 28, 2006, each contained the following certification: "I hereby swear or affirm that the actual consideration or value of the transfer, whichever is greater, is_" The value assigned the respective tracts were as…”
In Re Williams, 247 B.R. 449 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2000). “The Debtor argues that the Successor Trustee Deed did not comply with Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-409 (a)(6)(A), which sets forth a tax payable for the privilege of recording deeds for the transfer of property.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-409(a)(6)(B) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-409(a)(6)(D) — 1 case
Webb Mtn, LLC v. Exec. Realty P'ship (In Re Webb Mtn, LLC), 414 B.R. 308 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2009). “The purpose of § 67-4-409 is “to generate state revenue, not supplant the priority rules found in .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-409(b) — 7 cases
Health & Educ. Families Bd. v. King, 678 S.W.2d 14 (Tenn. 1984). “” T.C.A. § 67-4-409(b). All of the facts before the Court are by stipulation.”
Kile v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 641 F. Supp. 723 (E.D. Tenn. 1986). “Finally, the FDIC argued that the Kiles’ mortgage could not be given priority over the mortgage held by the FDIC because the Kiles had not paid the privilege tax required under T.C.A. § 67-4-409(b) at the time the Bank’s deed of trust' was recorded and its privilege tax paid.”
Stewart v. Farmers Bank (In re Johnson), 39 B.R. 358 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1984). “T.C.A. § 67-4-409(b) requires that a recordation tax be paid before a deed of trust may be recorded to perfect a security interest in real property: (b) MORTGAGES, DEEDS OF TRUST AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS.”
Cox v. Union Cnty. Bank (In Re Cox), 57 B.R. 290 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1986). “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-4-409(b) (1983). 4 . Debtor also disputes the Bank’s calculations of her indebtedness represented by two other claims based on the notes dated November 8, 1977, and June 18, 1983.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-409(b)(10)(A) — 1 case
Bank of Am. v. Greene, 465 B.R. 789 (E.D. Tenn. 2012). “However, that same day, the Register improperly voided the DOT, 2 see Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-4-409(b)(10)(A), and improperly replaced it with a subsequent, unrelated instrument at the identical book and page numbers [Id.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-409(b)(5) — 2 cases
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-409(b)(7) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-409(c) — 1 case
State ex rel. Dep't of Transp. v. Harvey, 680 S.W.2d 792 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1984). “T.C.A. § 67-4-409(c) provides: “Any oath required in subsection (a) and (b) [as to value of, or consideration paid for, real property] of this section shall not be introduced in any proceeding had in connection with any condemnation action for the purpose of indicating the value…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-409(f)(l) — 1 case
Health & Educ. Families Bd. v. King, 678 S.W.2d 14 (Tenn. 1984). “” T.C.A. § 67-4-409(b). All of the facts before the Court are by stipulation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.