Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-1008 (2026)

Present use valuation - Capitalization of income method - Rollback taxes - Involuntary conversion of use

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 978,s 2, eff. 5/21/2024, app. to tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2025.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 383, s 4, eff. 5/11/2021.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 322, s 1, eff. 5/8/2019.

Amended by 2014 Tenn. Acts, ch. 589, s 1, eff. 1/1/2015.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 685, s 1, eff. 3/24/2016.

Acts 1976, ch. 782, § 8; 1979, ch. 149, §§ 1, 2; 1982, ch. 818, § 1; 1983, ch. 267, § 1; T.C.A., § 67-657; Acts 1987, ch. 279, §§ 1, 2, 4; 1992, ch. 661, §§ 8-12; 1995, ch. 459, §§ 1, 2; 1997 , ch. 160, § 1; 1998, ch. 683, § 1; 1999, ch. 141, § 6; 2001, ch. 152, §§ 4 - 7; 2002, ch. 632, §§ 2 - 5; 2006, ch. 861, § 2; 2008 , ch. 971, § 1; 2008 , ch. 1161, §§ 5, 6; 2010 , ch. 928, § 1; 2014 , ch. 589, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1986–2012 · leading case: Ready Mix, USA, LLC v. Jefferson Cnty., Tennessee, 380 S.W.3d 52 (Tenn. 2012).
Ready Mix, USA, LLC v. Jefferson Cnty., Tennessee, 380 S.W.3d 52 (Tenn. 2012). · cites it 8× “” 4 See Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-1008 (2011). Section 67-5-1008 provides, in pertinent part: (b)(1) After a parcel of land has been classified by the assessor of property as agricultural, forest, or open space land under the provisions of this part, the assessor of property shall…”
Marion Cnty. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 710 S.W.2d 521 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 8× “T.C.A. § 67-5-1008. Thus, the value of the land used for assessment purposes is not what a willing buyer in an arm’s length transaction would pay for the property if it were not restricted in use— we will call that the fair market value, T.”
Batson East-Land Co, Inc. v. Ronnie D. Boyd, 4 S.W.3d 185 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “T.C.A. § 67-5-1008. Thus, the value of the land used for assessment purposes is not what a willing buyer in an arm’s length transaction would pay for the property if it were not restricted in use .”
Steven Anderson v. Roy W. Hendrix, Jr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 7× “Hendrix took no action to appeal the assessment of rollback taxes to the state board of equalization as permitted by Tennessee Code Annotated § 67-5-1008(d)(3). Mr. Anderson paid the taxes to avoid a tax sale.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-1008(a)(2) — 2 cases
Marion Cnty. v. State Bd. of Equalization, 710 S.W.2d 521 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986). “T.C.A. § 67-5-1008. Thus, the value of the land used for assessment purposes is not what a willing buyer in an arm’s length transaction would pay for the property if it were not restricted in use— we will call that the fair market value, T.”
Batson East-Land Co, Inc. v. Ronnie D. Boyd, 4 S.W.3d 185 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). “T.C.A. § 67-5-1008. Thus, the value of the land used for assessment purposes is not what a willing buyer in an arm’s length transaction would pay for the property if it were not restricted in use .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-1008(d) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-1008(d)(3) — 1 case
Steven Anderson v. Roy W. Hendrix, Jr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “Hendrix took no action to appeal the assessment of rollback taxes to the state board of equalization as permitted by Tennessee Code Annotated § 67-5-1008(d)(3). Mr. Anderson paid the taxes to avoid a tax sale.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-1008(f) — 1 case
Steven Anderson v. Roy W. Hendrix, Jr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “Hendrix took no action to appeal the assessment of rollback taxes to the state board of equalization as permitted by Tennessee Code Annotated § 67-5-1008(d)(3). Mr. Anderson paid the taxes to avoid a tax sale.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-1008(f)(2006) — 1 case
Steven Anderson v. Roy W. Hendrix, Jr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “Hendrix took no action to appeal the assessment of rollback taxes to the state board of equalization as permitted by Tennessee Code Annotated § 67-5-1008(d)(3). Mr. Anderson paid the taxes to avoid a tax sale.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.