Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-212 (2026)

Religious, charitable, scientific, educational institutions - Assessment Act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1028,s 1, eff. 5/28/2024.

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 698, s 2, eff. 3/18/2022.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 355, Secs.s 2, s 3, s 4, s 5 eff. 5/10/2019.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 957, s 1, eff. 5/15/2018.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 527, s 1, eff. 3/7/2018.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 465, s 1, eff. 5/25/2017.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 155, s 1, eff. 7/1/2017.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 209, s 5, eff. 4/23/2013.

Acts 1973, ch. 226, § 5; 1974, ch. 771, §§ 5-7; 1974, ch. 774, §§ 1, 2; 1975, ch. 322, § 1; 1976, ch. 670, §§ 1, 2; 1976, ch. 849, § 1; 1977, ch. 255, §§ 1, 2; 1977, ch. 421, §§ 1-5; 1979, ch. 22, § 1; 1981, ch. 96, § 1; 1981, ch. 218, § 1; 1981, ch. 306, §§ 1, 2; 1982, ch. 713, § 1; 1983, ch. 460, § 1; T.C.A., § 67-513; Acts 1984, ch. 507, § 1; 1984, ch. 651, § 1; 1984, ch. 749, § 1; 1984, ch. 766, § 1; 1984, ch. 809, § 1; 1984, ch. 832, § 4; 1985, ch. 68, § 1; 1994, ch. 541, §§ 2-8; 1997 , ch. 467, § 1; 2000, ch. 628, § 1; 2000, ch. 793, § 1; 2000, ch. 938, § 2; 2000, ch. 993, § 2; 2002, ch. 687, §§ 1, 2; 2003 , ch. 251, § 1; 2004, ch. 531, § 2; 2004, ch. 635, § 1; 2004, ch. 732, §§ 1, 2; 2005, ch. 500, § 12(a); 2006, ch. 740, § 1; 2006, ch. 861, § 1; 2007 , ch. 292, § 2; 2008 , ch. 1104, §§ 2-4; 2010 , ch. 1036, § 2; 2010 , ch. 1074, § 1; 2011 , ch. 415, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases, 1984–2015 · leading case: Kopsombut-Myint Buddhist Ctr. v. State Bd. of Equalization Ex Rel. State, 728 S.W.2d 327 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986).
Kopsombut-Myint Buddhist Ctr. v. State Bd. of Equalization Ex Rel. State, 728 S.W.2d 327 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 46× “[3] However, the Commission concluded that the application for the 1982 tax exemption should be denied because the Kopsombut-Myint Buddhist Center was not a religious institution for the purposes of Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-212 . It also concluded that The Buddhist Temple, Inc.”
Christ Church Pentecostal v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization, 428 S.W.3d 800 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 25× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-5-212. Section 67-5-212 as it existed during the 2004-2008 tax periods is applicable to the current case.”
Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty. v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization, 817 S.W.2d 953 (Tenn. 1991). · cites it 26× “The complaint seeks a declaration that the 1984 amendment to T.C.A. § 67-5-212(a)(1), which provides that “a church parsonage shall be deemed to be property used purely and exclusively for religious purposes,” violates Article II, Section 28 of the state constitution.”
Shared Hosp. Servs. Corp. v. Ferguson, 673 S.W.2d 135 (Tenn. 1984). · cites it 16× “Appellee claimed exemption from taxation for its property as a charitable corporation pursuant to T.C.A. § 67-5-212. Both the Chancellor and the Court of Appeals allowed the exemption.”
Christian Home for the Aged, Inc. v. Tennessee Assessment Appeals Comm'n, 790 S.W.2d 288 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 10× “” The legislature exercised their power to grant a tax exemption by enacting Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-212 (1989) which states: (a)(1) There shall be exempt from property taxation the real and personal property, or any part thereof, owned by any religious, charitable, scientific or…”
Methodist Hospitals of Memphis v. Assessment Appeals Comm'n, 669 S.W.2d 305 (Tenn. 1984). · cites it 8× “See T.C.A. § 67-5-212. In a series of cases decided since City of Nashville v.”
Youth Programs, Inc. v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization, 170 S.W.3d 92 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 36× “We turn next to whether the chancery court erred in determining Youth Programs is entitled to an ad valorem property tax exemption on property used exclusively for the tournament to raise funds for St.”
Summers v. Cherokee Child. & Fam. Servs., Inc., 112 S.W.3d 486 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-5-212(a)(3)(B). This exemption and the liberal interpretation applied to tax exempt statutes are based upon the “benefit conferred on the public by such institutions, and a consequent relief, to some extent, of the burden upon the state to care for and…”
Super Flea Mkt. of Chattanooga, Inc. v. Olsen, 677 S.W.2d 449 (Tenn. 1984). · cites it 2× “See T.C.A. § 67-5-212. A similar exception from the sales tax is granted by T.”
Univ. of Tennessee v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 670 F. Supp. 1379 (E.D. Tenn. 1987). · cites it 2× “Finally, it is important to note that UT is fully tax exempt without any reservation.”
Downtown Hosp. Ass'n v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization, 760 S.W.2d 954 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 9× “In exercising this power, the Legislature enacted Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-5-212, the pertinent portions of which are as follows: Religious, charitable, scientific, educational institutions.”
State by Pierotti Ex Rel. Boone v. Sundquist, 884 S.W.2d 438 (Tenn. 1994). · cites it 2× “§ 48-58-601(b) ("The general assembly finds and declares that the services of nonprofit boards are critical to the efficient conduct and management of the public and charitable affairs of the citizens of this state.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-212(A)(3)(B) — 1 case
Christ Church Pentecostal v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization, 428 S.W.3d 800 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-5-212. Section 67-5-212 as it existed during the 2004-2008 tax periods is applicable to the current case.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-212(a) — 2 cases
Shared Hosp. Servs. Corp. v. Ferguson, 673 S.W.2d 135 (Tenn. 1984). “Appellee claimed exemption from taxation for its property as a charitable corporation pursuant to T.C.A. § 67-5-212. Both the Chancellor and the Court of Appeals allowed the exemption.”
Youth Programs, Inc. v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization, 170 S.W.3d 92 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “We turn next to whether the chancery court erred in determining Youth Programs is entitled to an ad valorem property tax exemption on property used exclusively for the tournament to raise funds for St.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-212(a)(1) — 4 cases
Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty. v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization, 817 S.W.2d 953 (Tenn. 1991). “The complaint seeks a declaration that the 1984 amendment to T.C.A. § 67-5-212(a)(1), which provides that “a church parsonage shall be deemed to be property used purely and exclusively for religious purposes,” violates Article II, Section 28 of the state constitution.”
Kopsombut-Myint Buddhist Ctr. v. State Bd. of Equalization Ex Rel. State, 728 S.W.2d 327 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986). “[3] However, the Commission concluded that the application for the 1982 tax exemption should be denied because the Kopsombut-Myint Buddhist Center was not a religious institution for the purposes of Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-212 . It also concluded that The Buddhist Temple, Inc.”
Methodist Hospitals of Memphis v. Assessment Appeals Comm'n, 669 S.W.2d 305 (Tenn. 1984). “See T.C.A. § 67-5-212. In a series of cases decided since City of Nashville v.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-212(a)(1)(A) — 1 case
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-212(a)(3) — 1 case
Youth Programs, Inc. v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization, 170 S.W.3d 92 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “We turn next to whether the chancery court erred in determining Youth Programs is entitled to an ad valorem property tax exemption on property used exclusively for the tournament to raise funds for St.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-212(a)(3)(B) — 1 case
Summers v. Cherokee Child. & Fam. Servs., Inc., 112 S.W.3d 486 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-5-212(a)(3)(B). This exemption and the liberal interpretation applied to tax exempt statutes are based upon the “benefit conferred on the public by such institutions, and a consequent relief, to some extent, of the burden upon the state to care for and…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-212(a)(4) — 1 case
Kopsombut-Myint Buddhist Ctr. v. State Bd. of Equalization Ex Rel. State, 728 S.W.2d 327 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986). “[3] However, the Commission concluded that the application for the 1982 tax exemption should be denied because the Kopsombut-Myint Buddhist Center was not a religious institution for the purposes of Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-212 . It also concluded that The Buddhist Temple, Inc.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-212(a)(l) — 3 cases
Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty. v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization, 817 S.W.2d 953 (Tenn. 1991). “The complaint seeks a declaration that the 1984 amendment to T.C.A. § 67-5-212(a)(1), which provides that “a church parsonage shall be deemed to be property used purely and exclusively for religious purposes,” violates Article II, Section 28 of the state constitution.”
Kopsombut-Myint Buddhist Ctr. v. State Bd. of Equalization Ex Rel. State, 728 S.W.2d 327 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986). “[3] However, the Commission concluded that the application for the 1982 tax exemption should be denied because the Kopsombut-Myint Buddhist Center was not a religious institution for the purposes of Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-212 . It also concluded that The Buddhist Temple, Inc.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-212(a)(l)(A) — 3 cases
Christ Church Pentecostal v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization, 428 S.W.3d 800 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-5-212. Section 67-5-212 as it existed during the 2004-2008 tax periods is applicable to the current case.”
Youth Programs, Inc. v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization, 170 S.W.3d 92 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “We turn next to whether the chancery court erred in determining Youth Programs is entitled to an ad valorem property tax exemption on property used exclusively for the tournament to raise funds for St.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-212(b)(2) — 1 case
State ex rel. Cnty. of Hamblen v. Knoxville Coll., 60 S.W.3d 93 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-212(b)(3) — 1 case
Methodist Hospitals of Memphis v. Assessment Appeals Comm'n, 669 S.W.2d 305 (Tenn. 1984). “See T.C.A. § 67-5-212. In a series of cases decided since City of Nashville v.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-212(b)(3)(B) — 1 case
Christ Church Pentecostal v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization, 428 S.W.3d 800 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-5-212. Section 67-5-212 as it existed during the 2004-2008 tax periods is applicable to the current case.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-212(b)(4) — 2 cases
Christ Church Pentecostal v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization, 428 S.W.3d 800 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-5-212. Section 67-5-212 as it existed during the 2004-2008 tax periods is applicable to the current case.”
State ex rel. Cnty. of Hamblen v. Knoxville Coll., 60 S.W.3d 93 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-212(b)(l) — 2 cases
Methodist Hospitals of Memphis v. Assessment Appeals Comm'n, 669 S.W.2d 305 (Tenn. 1984). “See T.C.A. § 67-5-212. In a series of cases decided since City of Nashville v.”
Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty. v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization, 817 S.W.2d 953 (Tenn. 1991). “The complaint seeks a declaration that the 1984 amendment to T.C.A. § 67-5-212(a)(1), which provides that “a church parsonage shall be deemed to be property used purely and exclusively for religious purposes,” violates Article II, Section 28 of the state constitution.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-212(c) — 6 cases
Christian Home for the Aged, Inc. v. Tennessee Assessment Appeals Comm'n, 790 S.W.2d 288 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1990). “” The legislature exercised their power to grant a tax exemption by enacting Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-212 (1989) which states: (a)(1) There shall be exempt from property taxation the real and personal property, or any part thereof, owned by any religious, charitable, scientific or…”
Shared Hosp. Servs. Corp. v. Ferguson, 673 S.W.2d 135 (Tenn. 1984). “Appellee claimed exemption from taxation for its property as a charitable corporation pursuant to T.C.A. § 67-5-212. Both the Chancellor and the Court of Appeals allowed the exemption.”
State by Pierotti Ex Rel. Boone v. Sundquist, 884 S.W.2d 438 (Tenn. 1994). “§ 48-58-601(b) ("The general assembly finds and declares that the services of nonprofit boards are critical to the efficient conduct and management of the public and charitable affairs of the citizens of this state.”
Christ Church Pentecostal v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization, 428 S.W.3d 800 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-5-212. Section 67-5-212 as it existed during the 2004-2008 tax periods is applicable to the current case.”
Youth Programs, Inc. v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization, 170 S.W.3d 92 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “We turn next to whether the chancery court erred in determining Youth Programs is entitled to an ad valorem property tax exemption on property used exclusively for the tournament to raise funds for St.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-212(i) — 1 case
Christ Church Pentecostal v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization, 428 S.W.3d 800 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-5-212. Section 67-5-212 as it existed during the 2004-2008 tax periods is applicable to the current case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.