Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-6-221 (2026)

Tax imposed on interstate or international telecommunications services sold to businesses - Privilege tax imposed on modern market telecommunications providers - Penalty

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 285, s 2, eff. 4/30/2021.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 157, s 1, eff. 4/23/2019.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 490, s 12, eff. 6/6/2017.

Acts 1989, ch. 312, § 10; 1992, ch. 529, § 5; 1993, ch. 190, §§ 1, 2; 1999, ch. 413, § 4; 2001, ch. 195, § 1; 2003, ch. 357, § 33; 2004, ch. 592, § 10; 2004, ch. 782, § 9; 2004, ch. 959, § 68; 2005, ch. 311, § 1; 2005, ch. 500, § 9.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1994–2013 · leading case: Nolichuckey Sand Co. v. Huddleston, 896 S.W.2d 782 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994).
Nolichuckey Sand Co. v. Huddleston, 896 S.W.2d 782 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 4× “1984 in its entirety was codified at T.C.A. § 67-6-221. Greene County was among the counties exempted from the provisions of T.”
Level 3 Commc'ns, LLC v. Richard Roberts, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-6-221 (a). The issue in this case is whether the (3)Connect Modem and (3)CrossRoads services Level 3 provided its customers during the relevant period, January 2001 - March 2004, were taxable telecommunication services, as that term was then defined.”
HBO Direct, Inc. v. Ruth E. Johnson, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). “In contrast, the Department found that satellite programming services were not exempt from Tennessee Code Annotated § 67-6-221, which taxes interstate telecommunication services.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.