Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-3-507 (2026)

Criminal history violation information required of persons having access to children - Review of records and registries - Verification - Exclusion from access to adults

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 688,s 179, eff. 7/1/2024.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 433, s 5, eff. 5/11/2023.

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 977, Secs.s 4, s 5, s 6, s 7, s 8, s 9, s 10, s 11, s 12 eff. 5/3/2022.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 839, s 2, s 3, s 4, s 5, s 6, s 7, s 8, s 9, s 10, s 11, s 12 eff. 7/1/2016.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 839, s 1, eff. 7/1/2016.

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 22, s 1, s 2 eff. 3/27/2015.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 101, s 2, eff. 4/8/2013.

Acts 2000, ch. 981, § 8; 2001, ch. 453, §§ 9 - 14; 2006, ch. 808, § 1; 2008 , ch. 922, §§ 1 - 3; 2009 , ch. 410, § 2; 2010 , ch. 1100, § 136; 2012 , ch. 575, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2014–2022 · leading case: Muhammad v. Azar (W.D. Tenn. 2020).
Muhammad v. Azar (W.D. Tenn. 2020). · cites it 2× “1 at PageID 4–5); see also Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-3-507 et seq. Then, in a letter dated July 31, 2018, TDHS informed Plaintiff that the State “is making changes to the waiver process to align with CCDBG.”
Jeff & Melissa Fitzpatrick v. State of Tennessee Dep't of Child.'s Servs. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “17 See Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-3-507 ; Tenn. Comp. R.”
Muhammad v. Azar (W.D. Tenn. 2022). “The breadth of that discretion is evident in the plain language of the relevant statute which provides that “[t]he department may by rule provide for a review process that utilizes an advisory group .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-3-507(f)(1) — 1 case
Muhammad v. Azar (W.D. Tenn. 2022). “The breadth of that discretion is evident in the plain language of the relevant statute which provides that “[t]he department may by rule provide for a review process that utilizes an advisory group .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.